07.02.2014 Views

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

230 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL|VOLUME <strong>36</strong> ISSUE 1<br />

contents <strong>of</strong> transmissions in an emergency involving danger <strong>of</strong> death or<br />

serious physical injury, or with a valid search warrant issued based on<br />

reasonable grounds. 32 Exceptions are made to non-content based requests<br />

such as subscriber information, which may be voluntarily released. 33<br />

In Crispin v Christian Audiger, California court confirmed that the SCA<br />

applies to all pictures, posts, messages and communications on Facebook<br />

and other social networks when privacy settings are available. 34 The court<br />

quashed a subpoena duces tecum issued by the defendant to Facebook and<br />

MySpace to hand over private information or messages from the plaintiff’s<br />

account. This decision also means that an accused in a criminal trial will<br />

also have no access to obtain private social networking material from<br />

potential witnesses, as the exceptions listed in the SCA are only available<br />

to government authorities.<br />

The only information that a social network may hand over to a nongovernmental<br />

authority without consent is basic subscriber details. This<br />

includes, for example, what email an account was registered under, when a<br />

user started their account, and what internet protocol (IP) address was<br />

used to create an account. 35 Basic subscriber information may be released<br />

by a social network to a third party with a valid subpoena domesticated<br />

wherever the social network is located and issued to the company’s<br />

registered agents. While the SCA does not affect publicly posted content,<br />

which litigators or investigators can capture on their own, it means that<br />

any private content required for a civil trial will have to be produced by<br />

the party who has access to it.<br />

2. The Canadian Charter <strong>of</strong> Rights and Freedoms <strong>36</strong><br />

As a practical matter in social networking cases, there will rarely be<br />

legal significance in applying Canadian standards, including the Charter, to<br />

gathering evidence in the US. The Charter does not ordinarily apply to law<br />

32<br />

Ibid § 2702.<br />

33<br />

Ibid § 2701.<br />

34<br />

Crispin v Christian Audigier, Inc, 717 F Supp (2d) 965 (CD Cal 2010).<br />

35<br />

An IP address is a 12 digit identifying number that is assigned by an internet service<br />

provider (ISP) such as a telephone or cable company to a computer when it accesses<br />

the internet and can be traced back to find the physical location where a computer<br />

accessed the internet.<br />

<strong>36</strong><br />

Canadian Charter <strong>of</strong> Rights and Freedoms, s 8, Part I <strong>of</strong> the Constitution Act, 1982,<br />

being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Charter].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!