MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law MLJ Volume 36-1.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
222 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL|VOLUME 36 ISSUE 1 an era where mobile phones equipped with cameras are common and internet usage has become widespread, presenting investigators and litigators with potential treasure troves of information. 3 A modern obsession with sharing personal thoughts and photographs with online acquaintances has led to incriminating statements and embarrassing photographs proving probative or undermining the credibility of witnesses and litigants in a wide range of cases. As a result, courts across North America are revising and reinterpreting their evidentiary rules to handle evidence gathered from social networking websites. This paper takes a comprehensive look at a wide variety of evidentiary issues, procedural rules and examples of social networking evidence used in criminal and civil cases in both Canada and the United States. Part II briefly introduces the major social networks and examines their use by courts. Part III addresses some of the general statutes which deal with investigators’ and courts’ access to social networking evidence. Part IV examines the acquisition and use of social networking evidence in the criminal context, including the importance and difficulties of authenticating evidence and the various ways in which courts have reviewed evidence to prevent prejudice. Part V examines the implications of social networking evidence in civil cases, particularly how litigants use court processes to discover information about their adversaries. This can range from uncovering unknown online defamers, to forcing the revelation of pictures or posts from a private section of a social network account. Lastly, we look at how civil courts deal with balancing privacy concerns with the broader obligation to disclose relevant material. II. SOCIAL NETWORKS: AN OVERVIEW Social networks are a part of daily life for a large number of Canadians and others across the globe. Websites such as Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Twitter and LinkedIn let users share statuses, personal pictures, and create personal profiles for themselves, their music bands, or social groups. There are estimated to be over 17 million user accounts in Canada 3 Charles Foster, “Social Networks are a Treasure Trove of Information” Claims Canada (October 2008), online:.
Social Incrimination 223 on Facebook alone. 4 These websites facilitate individuals sharing aspects of their lives with friends, acquaintances, or the public at large, depending on the privacy settings of the account. Photos, videos and personal statuses can be added to the website from home computers or from smart phones. Primarily physically located in California, social networks utilize large data storage facilities and rely on proprietary systems to control the upload of files and privacy settings used. The scale and complexity of these systems 5 means that litigants or investigators must rely upon the companies’ retrieval processes, and have very little ability to retrieve data deleted from the server. Unlike a personal computer where a single drive can be forensically scanned for deleted emails or files, lawyers seeking to use evidence from social networks must often pre-emptively capture the files themselves, obtain the cooperation of the opposing party, or (in criminal investigations) request that the hosting company preserve a user’s account. Each social networking website has its own unique format and appeals to its own niche. In order to appreciate the potential uses of social networking evidence, it is important to understand the various companies. Several of the most prominent are discussed below. A. MySpace MySpace, one of the earliest popular social networks, originally gained in popularity by allowing anonymous profiles and by catering to music fans with its ability to upload music and to customize the look of a profile. From its founding in 2003 up until early 2009, it was the predominant social network in North America. Cases involving MySpace often involve obtaining evidence against sexual predators, proving gang affiliation for those who relied on its partial anonymity to brag about their exploits, and more recently, providing evidence in civil cases. The main legal issue that arises is authentication, because users may create accounts under any pseudonym. Generally, profiles were public and available to anyone so, 4 Facebook provides estimates for its advertisers: see online: Facebook, (Login required). 5 The number of users grows every month. One source estimated that by the middle of 2011, the company had over 750 million monthly user. Jason Kinkaid, “Facebook Now Has 750 Million Users” (23 June 2011) online: .
- Page 183 and 184: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 185 and 186: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 187 and 188: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 189 and 190: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 191 and 192: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 193 and 194: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 195 and 196: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 197 and 198: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 199 and 200: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 201 and 202: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 203 and 204: The Trial Judge's Four Discretions
- Page 205 and 206: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 207 and 208: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 209 and 210: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 211 and 212: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 213 and 214: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 215 and 216: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 217 and 218: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 219 and 220: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 221 and 222: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 223 and 224: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 225 and 226: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 227 and 228: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 229 and 230: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 231 and 232: Tattoos and Police Dress Regulation
- Page 233: Social Incrimination: How North Ame
- Page 237 and 238: Social Incrimination 225 obtained a
- Page 239 and 240: Social Incrimination 227 authorship
- Page 241 and 242: Social Incrimination 229 convenient
- Page 243 and 244: Social Incrimination 231 enforcemen
- Page 245 and 246: Social Incrimination 233 should suf
- Page 247 and 248: Social Incrimination 235 prevents s
- Page 249 and 250: Social Incrimination 237 the eviden
- Page 251 and 252: Social Incrimination 239 arrest whe
- Page 253 and 254: Social Incrimination 241 prosecutio
- Page 255 and 256: Social Incrimination 243 used to re
- Page 257 and 258: Social Incrimination 245 video with
- Page 259 and 260: Social Incrimination 247 exaggerate
- Page 261 and 262: Social Incrimination 249 showed tha
- Page 263 and 264: Social Incrimination 251 3. Incrimi
- Page 265 and 266: Social Incrimination 253 fortunate
- Page 267 and 268: Social Incrimination 255 one of tho
- Page 269 and 270: Social Incrimination 257 by judge a
- Page 271 and 272: Social Incrimination 259 30.02(1) E
- Page 273 and 274: Social Incrimination 261 Nova Scoti
- Page 275 and 276: Social Incrimination 263 private Fa
- Page 277 and 278: Social Incrimination 265 woman fell
- Page 279 and 280: Social Incrimination 267 oversight
- Page 281 and 282: Social Incrimination 269 an acciden
- Page 283 and 284: Social Incrimination 271 preserve r
Social Incrimination 223<br />
on Facebook alone. 4 These websites facilitate individuals sharing aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
their lives with friends, acquaintances, or the public at large, depending on<br />
the privacy settings <strong>of</strong> the account. Photos, videos and personal statuses<br />
can be added to the website from home computers or from smart phones.<br />
Primarily physically located in California, social networks utilize large<br />
data storage facilities and rely on proprietary systems to control the upload<br />
<strong>of</strong> files and privacy settings used. The scale and complexity <strong>of</strong> these<br />
systems 5 means that litigants or investigators must rely upon the<br />
companies’ retrieval processes, and have very little ability to retrieve data<br />
deleted from the server. Unlike a personal computer where a single drive<br />
can be forensically scanned for deleted emails or files, lawyers seeking to<br />
use evidence from social networks must <strong>of</strong>ten pre-emptively capture the<br />
files themselves, obtain the cooperation <strong>of</strong> the opposing party, or (in<br />
criminal investigations) request that the hosting company preserve a user’s<br />
account.<br />
Each social networking website has its own unique format and appeals<br />
to its own niche. In order to appreciate the potential uses <strong>of</strong> social<br />
networking evidence, it is important to understand the various companies.<br />
Several <strong>of</strong> the most prominent are discussed below.<br />
A. MySpace<br />
MySpace, one <strong>of</strong> the earliest popular social networks, originally gained<br />
in popularity by allowing anonymous pr<strong>of</strong>iles and by catering to music<br />
fans with its ability to upload music and to customize the look <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
From its founding in 2003 up until early 2009, it was the predominant<br />
social network in North America. Cases involving MySpace <strong>of</strong>ten involve<br />
obtaining evidence against sexual predators, proving gang affiliation for<br />
those who relied on its partial anonymity to brag about their exploits, and<br />
more recently, providing evidence in civil cases. The main legal issue that<br />
arises is authentication, because users may create accounts under any<br />
pseudonym. Generally, pr<strong>of</strong>iles were public and available to anyone so,<br />
4<br />
Facebook provides estimates for its advertisers: see online: Facebook,<br />
(Login required).<br />
5<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> users grows every month. One source estimated that by the middle <strong>of</strong><br />
2011, the company had over 750 million monthly user. Jason Kinkaid, “Facebook<br />
Now Has 750 Million Users” (23 June 2011) online:<br />
.