Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm
Table 16.4 Summary of Effects – Cultural Heritage and Archaeology
Receptor
Effect
Development
Phase
Sensitivity/
Importance of
Receptor
Magnitude
of Change
Level of
Effect (and
Significance)
Prior to
Mitigation
Mitigation
Enhancement
Level of Effect
(and
Significance)
after
Mitigation
Nature of Effect
Effects on
buried
archaeological
remains
Disturbance of
buried remains.
Construction
Negligible to
Low
None-Small
Slight (not
significant)
Programme
of fieldwork
-
Slight(not
significant)
Possible further
disturbance of
buried remains
already
damaged by
forestry planting.
Scheduled Monuments (n.b. no Scheduled Monument shown on Figures 10.1-10.3 would have a greater than slight (not significant) adverse effect other than those listed below)
Core Study Area (up to 1.5 km outside boundary of proposed wind farm)
SM 1930
Camilty
Hill,Roman
fortlet,Castle
Greg
Effect on
setting.
Operation High Medium
Moderate
(significant)
-
Screen planting
remaining
Moderate
(significant)
Moderate
negative effect
Total of 2
further SMs.
See Appendix
10.1 for details
Effect on
setting.
Operation High Small
Slight (not
significant)
-
Screen planting
remaining
Slight (not
significant)
Slight negative
effect
Inner Study Area (1.5 to 5 km of the boundary of proposed wind farm)
Total of six SMs
See Appendix
10.1 for details
Effect on
setting.
Operation High Small
Slight (not
significant)
-
Screen planting
remaining
Slight (not
significant)
Slight negative
effect
March 2013 16-8 ES Chapter 16
Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Summary of Effects and Mitigation