Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect Development Phase Sensitivity/ Importance of Receptor Magnitude of Change Level of Effect (and Significance) Prior to Mitigation Mitigation Enhancement Level of Effect (and Significance) after Mitigation Nature of Effect Recreation and outdoor access Outdoor Access development opportunities. Operational phase. Medium: The site is currently not well used for public access and has excellent potential. Small: the extent of new footpaths that would be created is limited. Slight (not significant) - - Moderate Positive: New access opportunities may be created. Recreation and outdoor access Outdoor Access (off site) experience. Operational phase. High: The Pentland Hills is a popular recreational resource and is sufficeintly close to be potentially affected. Small:The far west of the Regional Park in closest proximity to the proposed wind farm is far less used as a recreational resource than other parts of the Park. The number of people who feel strongly enough about wind farms that it would deter them from using these accesss routes is likely to be very small. Slight (not significant) - - Slight (not significant) Negative: Some access users may be deterred by visual effects. March 2013 15-32 ES Chapter 15 Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 © Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation

Camilty Wind Farm 15.7 Cumulative Effects 15.7.1 No potential for cumulative effects upon employment and the economy and land use due to the proposed wind farm and other existing wind farms, those which have planning permission or valid applications for wind farms in the area has been identified. 15.7.2 The greatest potential for having a significant detrimental effect on the levels of tourism and recreational activity in the area as a result of cumulative effects would be on the Pentland Hills Regional Park. This potential is based on the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment (ES chapter 9) which identifies that the greatest number of views of cumulative wind farms would be attained from within the Pentland Hills. As previously identified, the sensitivity of the Pentland Hills Regional Park is considered to be high given its importance as an established and popular recreational resource and its close proximity to the site. 15.7.3 The landscape and visual impact assessment identifies that there would be a number of potential combined and successive cumulative effects from viewpoints within the Regional Park. These cumulative effects would predominantly arise as a result of the number of proposed wind farms which lie in close proximity to the proposed wind farm, in particular the proposed Fauch Hill Wind Farm (a 23 turbine scheme approximately 1.6 km from the proposed wind farm), the proposed Harburnhead Wind Farm (a 22 turbine scheme approximately 1.9 km from the proposed wind farm) and the proposed Pearie Law Wind Farm (a 6 turbine scheme approximately 3.3 km from the proposed wind farm). However, the landscape and visual assessment concludes that the addition of the proposed wind farm into this potentially far more developed cumulative context would result in a lower level of landscape and visual effect compared with seeing the proposed wind farm in a relatively undeveloped context such as the current baseline. Consequently the landscape and visual impact assessment predicts that there would be no significant cumulative effects upon the Pentland Hills as a result of the introduction of the proposed wind farm. 15.7.4 On the basis of the findings of the landscape and visual impact assessment, as well as on the findings of the various surveys as identified above into the effect of wind farms on tourists and recreational users, it is considered that the number of recreational users who may deterred from visiting the Pentland Hills Regional Park by potential cumulative impacts arising from the introduction of the proposed wind farm would be very small. The magnitude of change is therefore considered to be small, resulting in a slight negative predicted effect on the recreational demand within the Pentland Hills during the operational phase. 15.7.5 The landscape and visual impact assessment also considers the potential for cumulative effects on the A70, including the sections to the south and to north of the site which West Lothian Council has identified as principal sensitive tourist routes. As previously identified, given that neither of these routes form signed tourist routes or scenic routes as shown on any motoring or tourists maps, the sensitivity of these receptors is considered to be low. 15.7.6 To the south, the landscape and visual assessment concludes that the addition of the proposed wind farm to the proposed Harburnhead, Pearie Law and Fauch Hill Wind Farms would result in significant adverse visual effects on the section of the A70 within 4 km of the site when travelling north in views extending from Cobbinshaw Reservoir on the left of the A70 across to the Pentland Hills on the right. This section of road includes the section at the southern West Lothian boundary identified as a sensitive tourist route. However, given that March 2013 15-33 ES Chapter 15 Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Receptor Effect Development<br />

Phase<br />

Sensitivity/<br />

Importance of<br />

Receptor<br />

Magnitude of<br />

Change<br />

Level of<br />

Effect (and<br />

Significance)<br />

Prior to<br />

Mitigation<br />

Mitigation Enhancement Level of<br />

Effect (and<br />

Significance)<br />

after<br />

Mitigation<br />

Nature of<br />

Effect<br />

Recreation<br />

and outdoor<br />

access<br />

Outdoor<br />

Access<br />

development<br />

opportunities.<br />

Operational<br />

phase.<br />

Medium: The<br />

site is currently<br />

not well used<br />

<strong>for</strong> public<br />

access and has<br />

excellent<br />

potential.<br />

Small: the extent of<br />

new footpaths that<br />

would be created is<br />

limited.<br />

Slight (not<br />

significant)<br />

- - Moderate Positive: New<br />

access<br />

opportunities<br />

may be<br />

created.<br />

Recreation<br />

and outdoor<br />

access<br />

Outdoor<br />

Access (off<br />

site)<br />

experience.<br />

Operational<br />

phase.<br />

High: The<br />

Pentland Hills<br />

is a popular<br />

recreational<br />

resource and is<br />

sufficeintly<br />

close to be<br />

potentially<br />

affected.<br />

Small:The far west of<br />

the Regional Park in<br />

closest proximity to<br />

the proposed wind<br />

farm is far less used<br />

as a recreational<br />

resource than other<br />

parts of the Park. The<br />

number of people<br />

who feel strongly<br />

enough about wind<br />

farms that it would<br />

deter them from<br />

using these accesss<br />

routes is likely to be<br />

very small.<br />

Slight (not<br />

significant)<br />

- - Slight (not<br />

significant)<br />

Negative:<br />

Some access<br />

users may be<br />

deterred by<br />

visual effects.<br />

March 2013 15-32 ES Chapter 15<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©<br />

Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!