Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm • A705 between Livingston and Seafield – The ZTV predicts there would be theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines within views southwards across the Almond Valley towards the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that, although there would be views of the proposed wind farm from the A705, these would be intermittent and far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • A899 Livingston ‘spine road’ – The ZTV predicts there would be theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines within views southwards towards Auchinoon Hill, Corston Hill and the Pentlands. Site visits confirm that views of the proposed wind farm would be screened by the roadside vegetation and buildings; • A89 between Blackridge and Armadale – The proposed wind farm would not be visible within views northwards to the Blackridge Heights which provide the justification for this route as a sensitive tourist route; • A800 and A801 – There would be no visibility of the proposed wind farm in views eastwards towards the Bathgate Hills. The ZTV predicts theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines when travelling southwards in views towards the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that views of the proposed wind farm from the A801 would be screened by the surrounding vegetation. Although there may be intermittent views when travelling southwards on the A800, any views that are experienced of the proposed wind farm would be far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • B8046 at Tar Hill – The ZTV predicts theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines when travelling southbound in views towards the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that views of the proposed wind farm would be predominantly screened by the intervening vegetation and buildings and that any views that are experienced would be far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • M9 west of junction 2 – There would be no visibility of the proposed wind farm from this section of road; • M9 west of junction 1a – The ZTV predicts theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines when travelling eastbound in views southwards to the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that views would be intermittent and far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • A904 between Newton and Queensferry – There would be no visibility of the proposed wind farm in views northwards towards the Forth bridges and the Ochil Hills. 15.4.36 On this basis, it is considered that the proposed wind farm is unlikely to deter visitors from using these sensitive tourist routes. The magnitude of this effect is therefore considered to be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect on this tourist resource. Tourism Accommodation 15.4.37 There is very limited accommodation supply within the locality of the proposed wind farm for the proposal to result in a detectable change to visitor numbers and the economy of the area in general. The sensitivity of this receptor is therefore considered to be low. 15.4.38 Although it is possible that some potential visitors may be deterred from staying in tourist accommodation within the towns and villages of Livingston, Uphall, East Calder and Bathgate March 2013 15-24 ES Chapter 15 Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm if there was a possibility that their view would be compromised, given the distance from these settlements and on the basis of the various surveys on the effects of wind farms on tourists identified above, it is considered that the number of such visitors would be small. It is also expected that any losses incurred in this way would be compensated for, to some degree if not completely, by an increase in accommodation demand during the construction and decommissioning periods (as a result of contractors outwith the area that require accommodation). The magnitude of this effect is therefore considered to be small. 15.4.39 Overall the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect on tourist accommodation providers. Access and Recreation 15.4.40 Public access to the site in general is afforded by the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003. The site of the proposed wind farm is not considered to be well used for outdoor access purposes and the sensitivity of this receptor is therefore considered to be low. Construction and decommissioning activities on the site would inevitably result in a loss of public access to parts of the site where turbines are being installed and materials and equipment stored for health and safety reasons. However, given this loss would only be for a short term temporary period, given such closures would not apply to the wider application site or tracks within it and given short closures for health and safety reasons already commonly occur during harvesting operations, the magnitude of this change is considered to be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect with regards to on-site public access during the construction / decommissioning phases. 15.4.41 By making the site more accessible through the construction of access tracks for the proposed wind farm and upgrading existing forestry tracks to create circular routes from the Shear Bridge car park , it is possible that the site may become more popular for public access during the operational phase. Given the site is not considered to currently be well used for outdoor access, the sensitivity of this receptor is considered to be medium. However, given the limited extend of footpaths that will be created and the fact that these footpaths do not link to any other wider access networks, the magnitude of this change is therefore considered to be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight positive effect with regards to on-site access during the operational period. 15.4.42 Outwith the site, the most sensitive receptor to the proposed wind farm is the Pentland Hills Regional Park given its importance as an established and popular recreational resource and its relatively close proximity to the site. The sensitivity of the Regional Park is therefore considered to be High. 15.4.43 The Zone of Theoretical Visibility for the proposed wind farm demonstrates that visibility of the proposed turbines would be predominantly confined to the western parts of the Regional Park (to the west of Mid Hill) and to the northern parts of the Regional Park to the south-east of Balerno and Currie. As illustrated in the Pentland Hills Visitor Survey (TNS, 2006) , the far west of the Regional Park is generally far less used as a recreational resource than other parts of the Regional Park and is therefore considered to have a reduced sensitivity as a recreational resource. 15.4.44 The landscape and visual impact assessment (ES Chapter 9) identifies that from the western parts of the Regional Park, the proposed wind farm would have an indirect impact on the landscape and visual character and qualities of the area. Viewpoints 11 Harperrig Reservoir (Figure 9.14/11) and 12 West Cairn Hill (Figure 9.14/12) are considered to be representative March 2013 15-25 ES Chapter 15 Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 440 and 441: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.13 Distr
- Page 442 and 443: Camilty Wind Farm Public Water Supp
- Page 444 and 445: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.16 Sensi
- Page 446 and 447: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.17 Compa
- Page 448 and 449: Camilty Wind Farm 13.5.32 The site
- Page 450 and 451: Camilty Wind Farm Superficial Depos
- Page 452 and 453: Camilty Wind Farm 110% of the fuel
- Page 454 and 455: Camilty Wind Farm • Improving wat
- Page 456 and 457: Camilty Wind Farm March 2013 be nea
- Page 458 and 459: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.18 Summa
- Page 460 and 461: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 462 and 463: Camilty Wind Farm • Scottish Gove
- Page 464 and 465: Camilty Wind Farm (as shown on Figu
- Page 466 and 467: Camilty Wind Farm at the time of oc
- Page 468 and 469: Camilty Wind Farm Criteria for Magn
- Page 470 and 471: Camilty Wind Farm • “The locati
- Page 472 and 473: Camilty Wind Farm 15.3.11 The econo
- Page 474 and 475: Camilty Wind Farm Land Use 15.3.19
- Page 476 and 477: Camilty Wind Farm 15.3.30 Tourism f
- Page 478 and 479: Camilty Wind Farm • Linlithgow Ca
- Page 480 and 481: Camilty Wind Farm were not availabl
- Page 482 and 483: Camilty Wind Farm • A 5.5 km trai
- Page 484 and 485: Camilty Wind Farm 15.4.6 In additio
- Page 486 and 487: Camilty Wind Farm 15.4.19 Given the
- Page 488 and 489: Camilty Wind Farm exploration of hi
- Page 492 and 493: Camilty Wind Farm of the views that
- Page 494 and 495: Camilty Wind Farm Table 15.9 Summar
- Page 496 and 497: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 498 and 499: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 500 and 501: Camilty Wind Farm the justification
- Page 502 and 503: Camilty Wind Farm 16 Summary of Eff
- Page 504 and 505: Camilty Wind Farm Table 16.2 Summar
- Page 506 and 507: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 508 and 509: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 510 and 511: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 512 and 513: Camilty Wind Farm Table 16.5 Summar
- Page 514 and 515: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 516 and 517: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 518 and 519: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 520 and 521: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 522 and 523: Camilty Wind Farm Level of Level of
- Page 524 and 525: Camilty Wind Farm Level of Level of
- Page 526 and 527: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 528 and 529: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 530 and 531: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 532 and 533: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 534 and 535: Camilty Wind Farm site management.
- Page 536 and 537: Camilty Wind Farm Topic Landscape a
- Page 538 and 539: Camilty Wind Farm Topic Key Mitigat
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
if there was a possibility that their view would be compromised, given the distance from these<br />
settlements and on the basis of the various surveys on the effects of wind farms on tourists<br />
identified above, it is considered that the number of such visitors would be small. It is also<br />
expected that any losses incurred in this way would be compensated <strong>for</strong>, to some degree if<br />
not completely, by an increase in accommodation demand during the construction and<br />
decommissioning periods (as a result of contractors outwith the area that require<br />
accommodation). The magnitude of this effect is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to be small.<br />
15.4.39 Overall the proposed wind farm is there<strong>for</strong>e anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative<br />
effect on tourist accommodation providers.<br />
Access and Recreation<br />
15.4.40 Public access to the site in general is af<strong>for</strong>ded by the Land Re<strong>for</strong>m (Scotland) Act 2003. The<br />
site of the proposed wind farm is not considered to be well used <strong>for</strong> outdoor access purposes<br />
and the sensitivity of this receptor is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to be low. Construction and<br />
decommissioning activities on the site would inevitably result in a loss of public access to<br />
parts of the site where turbines are being installed and materials and equipment stored <strong>for</strong><br />
health and safety reasons. However, given this loss would only be <strong>for</strong> a short term temporary<br />
period, given such closures would not apply to the wider application site or tracks within it and<br />
given short closures <strong>for</strong> health and safety reasons already commonly occur during harvesting<br />
operations, the magnitude of this change is considered to be small. Overall, the proposed<br />
wind farm is there<strong>for</strong>e anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect with regards to<br />
on-site public access during the construction / decommissioning phases.<br />
15.4.41 By making the site more accessible through the construction of access tracks <strong>for</strong> the<br />
proposed wind farm and upgrading existing <strong>for</strong>estry tracks to create circular routes from the<br />
Shear Bridge car park , it is possible that the site may become more popular <strong>for</strong> public access<br />
during the operational phase. Given the site is not considered to currently be well used <strong>for</strong><br />
outdoor access, the sensitivity of this receptor is considered to be medium. However, given<br />
the limited extend of footpaths that will be created and the fact that these footpaths do not link<br />
to any other wider access networks, the magnitude of this change is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to<br />
be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is there<strong>for</strong>e anticipated to have a slight positive<br />
effect with regards to on-site access during the operational period.<br />
15.4.42 Outwith the site, the most sensitive receptor to the proposed wind farm is the Pentland Hills<br />
Regional Park given its importance as an established and popular recreational resource and<br />
its relatively close proximity to the site. The sensitivity of the Regional Park is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
considered to be High.<br />
15.4.43 The Zone of Theoretical Visibility <strong>for</strong> the proposed wind farm demonstrates that visibility of<br />
the proposed turbines would be predominantly confined to the western parts of the Regional<br />
Park (to the west of Mid Hill) and to the northern parts of the Regional Park to the south-east<br />
of Balerno and Currie. As illustrated in the Pentland Hills Visitor Survey (TNS, 2006) , the far<br />
west of the Regional Park is generally far less used as a recreational resource than other<br />
parts of the Regional Park and is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to have a reduced sensitivity as a<br />
recreational resource.<br />
15.4.44 The landscape and visual impact assessment (ES Chapter 9) identifies that from the western<br />
parts of the Regional Park, the proposed wind farm would have an indirect impact on the<br />
landscape and visual character and qualities of the area. Viewpoints 11 Harperrig Reservoir<br />
(Figure 9.14/11) and 12 West Cairn Hill (Figure 9.14/12) are considered to be representative<br />
March 2013 15-25 ES Chapter 15<br />
Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©