Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm • A705 between Livingston and Seafield – The ZTV predicts there would be theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines within views southwards across the Almond Valley towards the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that, although there would be views of the proposed wind farm from the A705, these would be intermittent and far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • A899 Livingston ‘spine road’ – The ZTV predicts there would be theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines within views southwards towards Auchinoon Hill, Corston Hill and the Pentlands. Site visits confirm that views of the proposed wind farm would be screened by the roadside vegetation and buildings; • A89 between Blackridge and Armadale – The proposed wind farm would not be visible within views northwards to the Blackridge Heights which provide the justification for this route as a sensitive tourist route; • A800 and A801 – There would be no visibility of the proposed wind farm in views eastwards towards the Bathgate Hills. The ZTV predicts theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines when travelling southwards in views towards the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that views of the proposed wind farm from the A801 would be screened by the surrounding vegetation. Although there may be intermittent views when travelling southwards on the A800, any views that are experienced of the proposed wind farm would be far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • B8046 at Tar Hill – The ZTV predicts theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines when travelling southbound in views towards the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that views of the proposed wind farm would be predominantly screened by the intervening vegetation and buildings and that any views that are experienced would be far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • M9 west of junction 2 – There would be no visibility of the proposed wind farm from this section of road; • M9 west of junction 1a – The ZTV predicts theoretical visibility of up to 6 turbines when travelling eastbound in views southwards to the Pentland Hills. Site visits confirm that views would be intermittent and far enough away for visitors’ appreciation and enjoyment not to be significantly affected; • A904 between Newton and Queensferry – There would be no visibility of the proposed wind farm in views northwards towards the Forth bridges and the Ochil Hills. 15.4.36 On this basis, it is considered that the proposed wind farm is unlikely to deter visitors from using these sensitive tourist routes. The magnitude of this effect is therefore considered to be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect on this tourist resource. Tourism Accommodation 15.4.37 There is very limited accommodation supply within the locality of the proposed wind farm for the proposal to result in a detectable change to visitor numbers and the economy of the area in general. The sensitivity of this receptor is therefore considered to be low. 15.4.38 Although it is possible that some potential visitors may be deterred from staying in tourist accommodation within the towns and villages of Livingston, Uphall, East Calder and Bathgate March 2013 15-24 ES Chapter 15 Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Camilty Wind Farm if there was a possibility that their view would be compromised, given the distance from these settlements and on the basis of the various surveys on the effects of wind farms on tourists identified above, it is considered that the number of such visitors would be small. It is also expected that any losses incurred in this way would be compensated for, to some degree if not completely, by an increase in accommodation demand during the construction and decommissioning periods (as a result of contractors outwith the area that require accommodation). The magnitude of this effect is therefore considered to be small. 15.4.39 Overall the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect on tourist accommodation providers. Access and Recreation 15.4.40 Public access to the site in general is afforded by the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003. The site of the proposed wind farm is not considered to be well used for outdoor access purposes and the sensitivity of this receptor is therefore considered to be low. Construction and decommissioning activities on the site would inevitably result in a loss of public access to parts of the site where turbines are being installed and materials and equipment stored for health and safety reasons. However, given this loss would only be for a short term temporary period, given such closures would not apply to the wider application site or tracks within it and given short closures for health and safety reasons already commonly occur during harvesting operations, the magnitude of this change is considered to be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect with regards to on-site public access during the construction / decommissioning phases. 15.4.41 By making the site more accessible through the construction of access tracks for the proposed wind farm and upgrading existing forestry tracks to create circular routes from the Shear Bridge car park , it is possible that the site may become more popular for public access during the operational phase. Given the site is not considered to currently be well used for outdoor access, the sensitivity of this receptor is considered to be medium. However, given the limited extend of footpaths that will be created and the fact that these footpaths do not link to any other wider access networks, the magnitude of this change is therefore considered to be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is therefore anticipated to have a slight positive effect with regards to on-site access during the operational period. 15.4.42 Outwith the site, the most sensitive receptor to the proposed wind farm is the Pentland Hills Regional Park given its importance as an established and popular recreational resource and its relatively close proximity to the site. The sensitivity of the Regional Park is therefore considered to be High. 15.4.43 The Zone of Theoretical Visibility for the proposed wind farm demonstrates that visibility of the proposed turbines would be predominantly confined to the western parts of the Regional Park (to the west of Mid Hill) and to the northern parts of the Regional Park to the south-east of Balerno and Currie. As illustrated in the Pentland Hills Visitor Survey (TNS, 2006) , the far west of the Regional Park is generally far less used as a recreational resource than other parts of the Regional Park and is therefore considered to have a reduced sensitivity as a recreational resource. 15.4.44 The landscape and visual impact assessment (ES Chapter 9) identifies that from the western parts of the Regional Park, the proposed wind farm would have an indirect impact on the landscape and visual character and qualities of the area. Viewpoints 11 Harperrig Reservoir (Figure 9.14/11) and 12 West Cairn Hill (Figure 9.14/12) are considered to be representative March 2013 15-25 ES Chapter 15 Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

if there was a possibility that their view would be compromised, given the distance from these<br />

settlements and on the basis of the various surveys on the effects of wind farms on tourists<br />

identified above, it is considered that the number of such visitors would be small. It is also<br />

expected that any losses incurred in this way would be compensated <strong>for</strong>, to some degree if<br />

not completely, by an increase in accommodation demand during the construction and<br />

decommissioning periods (as a result of contractors outwith the area that require<br />

accommodation). The magnitude of this effect is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to be small.<br />

15.4.39 Overall the proposed wind farm is there<strong>for</strong>e anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative<br />

effect on tourist accommodation providers.<br />

Access and Recreation<br />

15.4.40 Public access to the site in general is af<strong>for</strong>ded by the Land Re<strong>for</strong>m (Scotland) Act 2003. The<br />

site of the proposed wind farm is not considered to be well used <strong>for</strong> outdoor access purposes<br />

and the sensitivity of this receptor is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to be low. Construction and<br />

decommissioning activities on the site would inevitably result in a loss of public access to<br />

parts of the site where turbines are being installed and materials and equipment stored <strong>for</strong><br />

health and safety reasons. However, given this loss would only be <strong>for</strong> a short term temporary<br />

period, given such closures would not apply to the wider application site or tracks within it and<br />

given short closures <strong>for</strong> health and safety reasons already commonly occur during harvesting<br />

operations, the magnitude of this change is considered to be small. Overall, the proposed<br />

wind farm is there<strong>for</strong>e anticipated to have a slight or negligible negative effect with regards to<br />

on-site public access during the construction / decommissioning phases.<br />

15.4.41 By making the site more accessible through the construction of access tracks <strong>for</strong> the<br />

proposed wind farm and upgrading existing <strong>for</strong>estry tracks to create circular routes from the<br />

Shear Bridge car park , it is possible that the site may become more popular <strong>for</strong> public access<br />

during the operational phase. Given the site is not considered to currently be well used <strong>for</strong><br />

outdoor access, the sensitivity of this receptor is considered to be medium. However, given<br />

the limited extend of footpaths that will be created and the fact that these footpaths do not link<br />

to any other wider access networks, the magnitude of this change is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to<br />

be small. Overall, the proposed wind farm is there<strong>for</strong>e anticipated to have a slight positive<br />

effect with regards to on-site access during the operational period.<br />

15.4.42 Outwith the site, the most sensitive receptor to the proposed wind farm is the Pentland Hills<br />

Regional Park given its importance as an established and popular recreational resource and<br />

its relatively close proximity to the site. The sensitivity of the Regional Park is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

considered to be High.<br />

15.4.43 The Zone of Theoretical Visibility <strong>for</strong> the proposed wind farm demonstrates that visibility of<br />

the proposed turbines would be predominantly confined to the western parts of the Regional<br />

Park (to the west of Mid Hill) and to the northern parts of the Regional Park to the south-east<br />

of Balerno and Currie. As illustrated in the Pentland Hills Visitor Survey (TNS, 2006) , the far<br />

west of the Regional Park is generally far less used as a recreational resource than other<br />

parts of the Regional Park and is there<strong>for</strong>e considered to have a reduced sensitivity as a<br />

recreational resource.<br />

15.4.44 The landscape and visual impact assessment (ES Chapter 9) identifies that from the western<br />

parts of the Regional Park, the proposed wind farm would have an indirect impact on the<br />

landscape and visual character and qualities of the area. Viewpoints 11 Harperrig Reservoir<br />

(Figure 9.14/11) and 12 West Cairn Hill (Figure 9.14/12) are considered to be representative<br />

March 2013 15-25 ES Chapter 15<br />

Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!