Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm 15.4.19 Given the extent of commercial forestry of similar age and structure locally, this receptor is considered to be generally tolerant to this loss and the sensitivity of this receptor is therefore considered to be low. 15.4.20 Much of the wind blow activity at Camilty has been within sites associated with the proposed turbine layout. When analysed with areas felled within the past five years, predicted fellings due to the proposed wind farm will be small within the term of the construction and outside that already targeted. 15.4.21 The extension of the forest felling operations to include the turbine infrastructure can be achieved by using the available work force, or transient forestry contractors that would normally resource such operations. In the short term, much of the crop generated from the construction of the wind farm will be sold and revenues generated. However, for the purposes of this assessment it has been assumed that, were the wind farm not to be built and operated, the extent of felling required for the purposes of the wind farm would eventually be felled under normal operations. Assuming the forestry operations continued over the lifetime of the wind farm it would not, therefore, be anticipated that there would be any significant net gain or loss with respect to timber sales resulting from the construction phase, and so the magnitude of change is considered negligible. Sections of felled and replanted trees will continue to mature during the lifetime of the forest and the operations required to successfully establishing trees will be carried out without interruption. 15.4.22 Construction of the proposed wind farm will therefore result in a small increase in forestry operational activity outside that already planned in the current FDP and is of low impact and hence minimal significance. The effect of the proposed development on site operations is, therefore, considered not significant. 15.4.23 Compensatory planting is planned to ensure that the total forestry land is not lost. This additional planting will be directed by the Forestry Commission Scotland and will be located on part of their current estate. This work will replace the lost area that would be reestablished as forest and therefore will balance the overall economic impacts regarding forestry operations. 15.4.24 The operational wind farm will result in the loss of approximately 21.03 ha of land from continued production over its 25 years (Appendix 4.1). This loss will be compensated for and additional areas of land will be used for forestry purposes. Thus the effect on the local economy from the wind farm on Camilty Forest is likely to be positive. Although the significance locally is currently not clear and will be realised from income received by the FCS provided from the wind farm itself. In addition, in the long term, the wind farm operation will make ongoing contributions to the Scottish economy through payment of business rates. Tourism and Recreation 15.4.25 The actual effects of the operational phase of the proposed wind farm on tourist and recreational users is difficult to assess given that people’s perception of the landscape and visual effects of wind farms are entirely subjective. For example, even at locations where the proposed wind turbines may be a significant feature in the landscape, for some tourists or recreational users this may increase their enjoyment and their future propensity to revisit, whilst for others the presence of turbines may decrease their enjoyment and propensity to revisit. Before assessing the effects of the proposed wind farm on tourism and recreation, a literature review of surveys relating to the effects of wind farms on these matters is discussed below. March 2013 15-20 ES Chapter 15 Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm Existing Tourism Evidence and Surveys 15.4.26 A number of studies have been undertaken in order to determine the effect upon tourism and recreation interests of the presence of a wind farm in an area. 15.4.27 The Scottish Government report ‘Economic Impacts of Wind Farms on Scottish Tourism’ (2008) is considered to be the most comprehensive and robust study into the potential effects of wind farm developments on tourism. The study, which was based upon an extensive literature review and survey of 380 people, found that there is no evidence to suggest that wind farms have a serious negative economic effect on tourism. The key findings of the survey were that: • 75 % of people (285 out of 380 respondents) felt that wind farms have a positive or neutral impact on the landscape; • Those interviewed whose main activity was hiking or walking (70 out of 351 respondents) were more likely to feel that wind farms have a positive or neutral impact on the landscape (81 %); • 2 % of those interviewed who had seen a wind farm in the area (4 respondents out of 191 who had seen a wind farm) said that it would affect their decision to visit the area again – two indicated that the likelihood would increase and two that the likelihood would decrease. No one indicated that they would not return as a result of the wind farm; • After seeing a photomontage of a local wind farm before and after development, 3 % of those interviewed (11 out of 379 respondents) said that it would affect their decision to visit the area again. 15.4.28 VisitScotland’s ‘Wind Farm Consumer Research’ (2012) provides the most up to date study into attitudes to wind farms and their effects on tourism. The study, which was based upon interviews with 1,000 people from within Scotland and 2,000 people from within the UK, found that for the majority of respondents (80 % of UK respondents and 83 % of Scottish respondents) that the presence of a wind farm would not affect their decision about where to stay when on holiday or on a short break. Other key findings of the study were that at present, UK/Scotland consumers do not feel that wind farms spoil the look of the countryside, with 81.4 % of UK respondents and 80.4 % of Scottish respondents claiming to disagree or neither agree or disagree with the statement that wind farms spoil the look of the countryside. 15.4.29 VisitScotland’s report ‘Investigation into the Potential Impact of Wind Farms on Tourism in Scotland’ (2002) focused upon the perceived impact of wind farms as a comparative visual element in the countryside in ascertaining visitors’ views and the visual impact upon their visitor experience. The research demonstrates that, in general, respondents have a more positive than negative view towards the effects of wind farms on tourism. The majority of those surveyed had a neutral view. Positive views included that wind farms can be an attraction in themselves in the landscape if sensitively sited. They are perceived to have the potential to attract new markets and those visitors attracted by “environmentally friendly” energy and new technology. New wind farm developments were also identified as having the potential to provide greater access to remote areas and have a positive effect on the local economy. The main negative effect identified by respondents was the visual impact, particularly in rural, undeveloped areas, which was recognised to be intrusive and therefore detract from the visitor’s experience. Other negative effects included mental ‘barriers’ for the March 2013 15-21 ES Chapter 15 Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 436 and 437: Camilty Wind Farm Land-use and Topo
- Page 438 and 439: Camilty Wind Farm Groundwater Flood
- Page 440 and 441: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.13 Distr
- Page 442 and 443: Camilty Wind Farm Public Water Supp
- Page 444 and 445: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.16 Sensi
- Page 446 and 447: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.17 Compa
- Page 448 and 449: Camilty Wind Farm 13.5.32 The site
- Page 450 and 451: Camilty Wind Farm Superficial Depos
- Page 452 and 453: Camilty Wind Farm 110% of the fuel
- Page 454 and 455: Camilty Wind Farm • Improving wat
- Page 456 and 457: Camilty Wind Farm March 2013 be nea
- Page 458 and 459: Camilty Wind Farm Table 13.18 Summa
- Page 460 and 461: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 462 and 463: Camilty Wind Farm • Scottish Gove
- Page 464 and 465: Camilty Wind Farm (as shown on Figu
- Page 466 and 467: Camilty Wind Farm at the time of oc
- Page 468 and 469: Camilty Wind Farm Criteria for Magn
- Page 470 and 471: Camilty Wind Farm • “The locati
- Page 472 and 473: Camilty Wind Farm 15.3.11 The econo
- Page 474 and 475: Camilty Wind Farm Land Use 15.3.19
- Page 476 and 477: Camilty Wind Farm 15.3.30 Tourism f
- Page 478 and 479: Camilty Wind Farm • Linlithgow Ca
- Page 480 and 481: Camilty Wind Farm were not availabl
- Page 482 and 483: Camilty Wind Farm • A 5.5 km trai
- Page 484 and 485: Camilty Wind Farm 15.4.6 In additio
- Page 488 and 489: Camilty Wind Farm exploration of hi
- Page 490 and 491: Camilty Wind Farm • A705 between
- Page 492 and 493: Camilty Wind Farm of the views that
- Page 494 and 495: Camilty Wind Farm Table 15.9 Summar
- Page 496 and 497: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 498 and 499: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 500 and 501: Camilty Wind Farm the justification
- Page 502 and 503: Camilty Wind Farm 16 Summary of Eff
- Page 504 and 505: Camilty Wind Farm Table 16.2 Summar
- Page 506 and 507: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 508 and 509: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 510 and 511: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 512 and 513: Camilty Wind Farm Table 16.5 Summar
- Page 514 and 515: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 516 and 517: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 518 and 519: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 520 and 521: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 522 and 523: Camilty Wind Farm Level of Level of
- Page 524 and 525: Camilty Wind Farm Level of Level of
- Page 526 and 527: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 528 and 529: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 530 and 531: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 532 and 533: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 534 and 535: Camilty Wind Farm site management.
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
15.4.19 Given the extent of commercial <strong>for</strong>estry of similar age and structure locally, this receptor is<br />
considered to be generally tolerant to this loss and the sensitivity of this receptor is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
considered to be low.<br />
15.4.20 Much of the wind blow activity at <strong>Camilty</strong> has been within sites associated with the proposed<br />
turbine layout. When analysed with areas felled within the past five years, predicted fellings<br />
due to the proposed wind farm will be small within the term of the construction and outside<br />
that already targeted.<br />
15.4.21 The extension of the <strong>for</strong>est felling operations to include the turbine infrastructure can be<br />
achieved by using the available work <strong>for</strong>ce, or transient <strong>for</strong>estry contractors that would<br />
normally resource such operations. In the short term, much of the crop generated from the<br />
construction of the wind farm will be sold and revenues generated. However, <strong>for</strong> the<br />
purposes of this assessment it has been assumed that, were the wind farm not to be built and<br />
operated, the extent of felling required <strong>for</strong> the purposes of the wind farm would eventually be<br />
felled under normal operations. Assuming the <strong>for</strong>estry operations continued over the lifetime<br />
of the wind farm it would not, there<strong>for</strong>e, be anticipated that there would be any significant net<br />
gain or loss with respect to timber sales resulting from the construction phase, and so the<br />
magnitude of change is considered negligible. Sections of felled and replanted trees will<br />
continue to mature during the lifetime of the <strong>for</strong>est and the operations required to successfully<br />
establishing trees will be carried out without interruption.<br />
15.4.22 Construction of the proposed wind farm will there<strong>for</strong>e result in a small increase in <strong>for</strong>estry<br />
operational activity outside that already planned in the current FDP and is of low impact and<br />
hence minimal significance. The effect of the proposed development on site operations is,<br />
there<strong>for</strong>e, considered not significant.<br />
15.4.23 Compensatory planting is planned to ensure that the total <strong>for</strong>estry land is not lost. This<br />
additional planting will be directed by the Forestry Commission Scotland and will be located<br />
on part of their current estate. This work will replace the lost area that would be reestablished<br />
as <strong>for</strong>est and there<strong>for</strong>e will balance the overall economic impacts regarding<br />
<strong>for</strong>estry operations.<br />
15.4.24 The operational wind farm will result in the loss of approximately 21.03 ha of land from<br />
continued production over its 25 years (Appendix 4.1). This loss will be compensated <strong>for</strong> and<br />
additional areas of land will be used <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>estry purposes. Thus the effect on the local<br />
economy from the wind farm on <strong>Camilty</strong> Forest is likely to be positive. Although the<br />
significance locally is currently not clear and will be realised from income received by the<br />
FCS provided from the wind farm itself. In addition, in the long term, the wind farm operation<br />
will make ongoing contributions to the Scottish economy through payment of business rates.<br />
Tourism and Recreation<br />
15.4.25 The actual effects of the operational phase of the proposed wind farm on tourist and<br />
recreational users is difficult to assess given that people’s perception of the landscape and<br />
visual effects of wind farms are entirely subjective. For example, even at locations where the<br />
proposed wind turbines may be a significant feature in the landscape, <strong>for</strong> some tourists or<br />
recreational users this may increase their enjoyment and their future propensity to revisit,<br />
whilst <strong>for</strong> others the presence of turbines may decrease their enjoyment and propensity to<br />
revisit. Be<strong>for</strong>e assessing the effects of the proposed wind farm on tourism and recreation, a<br />
literature review of surveys relating to the effects of wind farms on these matters is discussed<br />
below.<br />
March 2013 15-20 ES Chapter 15<br />
Socio-Economics, Tourism, Land-Use and Recreation<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©