07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Table 13.16 Sensitivity of Hydrological, Hydrogeological and Soils Receptors<br />

Receptor Sensitivity Justification<br />

Watercourses Low Narrow rivers of poor water quality and flow regime affected by<br />

abstractions <strong>for</strong> public water supplies.<br />

Groundwater Low Poor water quality status and groundwater vulnerability generally<br />

between 2 and 3.<br />

Soils and peat Medium Deep peat present in some areas within the site, however not<br />

designated.<br />

Superficial<br />

geology<br />

Bedrock<br />

geology<br />

Private water<br />

supplies<br />

Public water<br />

supplies<br />

Abstractions<br />

and discharges<br />

Low<br />

Low<br />

n/a<br />

n/a<br />

n/a<br />

Comprised diamicton till and alluvium deposits. No designated sites.<br />

No designated sites.<br />

Not further assessed as the nearest supply is more than 500 m from<br />

the proposed site boundary and not within an area<br />

hydro(geo)logically linked with the proposed site.<br />

Not further assessed as there is no water supply infrastructure within<br />

the proposed site.<br />

Not further assessed as there are no abstractions within or near the<br />

proposed site. All discharges unaffected and nearest discharge more<br />

than 600 m from the proposed site boundary.<br />

Summary of the Baseline Conditions<br />

13.3.56 The proposed site is characterised by its generally low-gradient topography and is crossed by<br />

a small river, the Crosswood Burn and its tributary the Powfastle Burn.<br />

13.3.57 There are two statutorily designated sites near the proposed site with relevance to the<br />

hydrology, the Cobinshaw Moss SSSI and the Craigengar SSSI. Both sites are designated<br />

<strong>for</strong> blanket bog.<br />

13.3.58 The natural hydrological regime of the proposed site has been disturbed by the presence of<br />

active commercial <strong>for</strong>estry, <strong>for</strong>estry tracks and the introduction of artificial drainage.<br />

13.3.59 The average peat depth at the site is approximately 1.4 m with a maximum peat depth of<br />

approximately 7 m in parts.<br />

13.4 Topic Specific Design Evolution<br />

13.4.1 During the design evolution process, a buffer of 50 m was established around all natural<br />

watercourses indentified on the 1:25,000 OS map of the area. All proposed infrastructure is<br />

kept outwith this buffer zone except <strong>for</strong> two watercourse crossings.<br />

13.4.2 The number of watercourse crossings was kept to the absolute minimum necessary. The<br />

location, alignment and structure design were developed to minimise the impact on river<br />

flows and geomorphology.<br />

13.4.3 The results of initial peat probing were used to locate the turbines away from deep peat, or<br />

from peat altogether. Following detailed peat depth surveys and an initial peat slide risk<br />

March 2013<br />

13-19<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©<br />

Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Ground Conditions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!