07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

13.2.6 Effects are identified by comparing the baseline hydrological, hydrogeological and ground<br />

conditions and how these would change over time without the project occurring (the “donothing”)<br />

scenario and how the baseline would likely change as a result of the development.<br />

Effects can be either positive (improving the baseline scenario) or adverse (detrimental to the<br />

baseline scenario).<br />

13.2.7 Having identified and characterised the potential effects that may arise during the<br />

construction, operation and decommissioning of the wind farm, the significance of effect can<br />

be assessed by taking into consideration the magnitude of effect predicted in relation to the<br />

sensitivity of the baseline.<br />

13.2.8 To determine the likely magnitude of effects, it is necessary to consider the timing, scale, size<br />

and duration of the potential activities. For the purposes of this assessment the magnitude<br />

criteria are defined as follows in Table 13.2.<br />

Table 13.2 Criteria <strong>for</strong> Defining Magnitude of Effect<br />

Magnitude Criteria Description and Example<br />

Large<br />

Medium<br />

Small<br />

Negligible<br />

Results in loss of<br />

attribute<br />

Affects integrity of<br />

attribute or partial<br />

loss of attribute<br />

Results in minor<br />

effect on attribute<br />

Results in an effect<br />

on attribute but of<br />

insufficient<br />

magnitude to affect<br />

the use/integrity<br />

• Fundamental (long term or permanent) changes to geology,<br />

hydrology, water quality and hydrogeology;<br />

• Loss of designated Salmonid Fishery;<br />

• Loss of national level designated species/habitats;<br />

• Changes in WFD water quality status of river reach;<br />

• Loss of flood storage/increased flood risk; and<br />

• Pollution of potable source of abstraction compared to predevelopment<br />

conditions<br />

• Material but non-fundamental and short to medium term<br />

changes to the geology, hydrology, water quality and<br />

hydrogeology;<br />

• Loss in productivity of a fishery;<br />

• Contribution of a significant proportion of the discharges in the<br />

receiving water, but insignificant enough to change its water<br />

quality status; and<br />

• No increase in flood risk.<br />

• Detectable but non-material and transitory changes to the<br />

geology, hydrology, water quality and hydrogeology; and<br />

• No increase in flood risk.<br />

• No perceptible changes to the geology, hydrology, water<br />

quality and hydrogeology;<br />

• Discharges to watercourse but no reduction in quality, fishery<br />

productivity or biodiversity; and<br />

• No increase in flood risk.<br />

13.2.9 Once the magnitude of any potential effects are assessed, the results can be compared with<br />

the sensitivity of the baseline environment and used to define the Level of the effect as<br />

outlined in Table 13.3.<br />

March 2013<br />

13-5<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©<br />

Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Ground Conditions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!