Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm sites for the same reasons given above in relation to wading bird species. However, at a distance of 19 km from the SPA, the proposed development is located within the 20 km foraging range of pink-footed geese. Therefore the birds observed flying over the site during flight activity surveys could potentially have been associated with the designated site. However, the core pink-footed goose roosting sites of the Firth of Forth (Skinflats, and Aberlady Bay) are located over 25 km and 40 km from the site respectively. Consequently, while some of the birds observed may have frequented these roosts at some point over the winter, it is unlikely that they will have commuted such distances to travel between these roost sites and foraging grounds in the vicinity of the proposed development. Therefore, in relation to the concerns raised by SNH over issues of connectivity, the likelihood of there being any connectivity between the Firth of Forth SPA, Ramsar Site and SSSI and the proposed Camilty wind farm site is low. As such, potential impacts on this suite of designated sites will not be considered any further in this assessment. 12.3.41 With regard to the notified ornithological interests of Easter Inch Moss and Seafield Law LNR (short-eared owl and reed bunting), only reed bunting was recorded at the proposed Camilty wind farm site during the entire bird survey programme and even then the species was represented only by a single individual during one of the winter walkover surveys. Consequently, the survey data strongly indicates that there is no evidence of any connectivity between this LNR and the site. As such, potential impacts on this site will not be considered any further in this assessment. Reference Populations and Conservation Status 12.3.42 As described in the Assessment of the Significance of Effects section (12.2.35 onwards), the level of a potential effect on each VOR was determined by considering the magnitude, extent and duration of the effect in relation to the conservation importance (sensitivity) of the VOR within the context of the reference population. 12.3.43 According to SNH (2006), an effect is judged to be of concern where it would “adversely affect the favourable conservation status of a species, or stop a recovering species reaching favourable conservation status, at international or national level, or regionally”. This is likely to be the case where a substantial or moderate adverse effect, not likely to be tolerable, is predicted using the matrix procedure, although expert judgement is applied in all cases. 12.3.44 The term ‘favourable conservation status’ (as articulated within the Habitats Directive) is defined by SNH (2006) as “the sum of influences acting on it which may affect its long-term distribution and abundance, within the geographical area of interest (which for the purposes of the Directive is the EU)”. This interpretation has become increasingly common in court cases within the context of the Birds Directive. Conservation status is favourable where: • Population dynamics indicate that the species is maintaining its population size on a long-term basis as a viable component of its habitats; • The natural range of the species is not being reduced, nor is likely to be reduced for the foreseeable future; and • There is (and will probably continue to be) a sufficiently large habitat to maintain its populations on a long-term basis. 12.3.45 The conservation status of each VOR is therefore considered at the international, national and/or regional scale, depending on whether the population is breeding, migratory or March 2013 12-36 ES Chapter 12 Ornithology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Camilty Wind Farm overwintering. For non-breeding or migratory species, consideration at a national scale is more appropriate than at regional level or lower. 12.3.46 For breeding birds, the regional scale equates to SNH’s Natural Heritage Zones (NHZ) 12 , where there is high biogeographical coherence within each zone. In this case, the proposed Camilty wind farm site just lies within the West Central Belt (NHZ 17) but is within 500 m of the Border Hills (NHZ 20) and 2 km of the Eastern Lowlands (NHZ 16). The extent of these NHZs and the location of the proposed wind farm site within/between them is presented in Figure 12.5. However, given the site’s location at the foot of the Pentland Hills, it is considered that the Border Hills NHZ more closely reflects the upland moorland and plantation habitat within and around the development site, and so is used as the primary reference population. Other populations (e.g. Scottish Raptor Study Group survey areas) will however be considered where appropriate. 12.3.47 With regard to overwintering migratory species (e.g. pink-footed geese and greylag geese), SNH consider the national or migratory flyway population to be the most relevant geographical scale upon which to assess impacts in such species (SNH, 2006). 12.3.48 In order to determine whether the conservation status of a species’ population will be adversely affected, it is necessary to obtain the best data on each VOR’s current population and recent trends. These are presented below. Goshawk 12.3.49 Goshawk is listed in Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, although it is greenlisted in the latest BoCC report (Eaton et al. 2009) due to its expansion since the mid 20th century. There are thought to be approximately 400 pairs in the UK (Robinson, 2005), with at least 130 pairs in Scotland (Forrester et al. 2007). The population is slowly expanding from two main population clusters, one in the Borders and one in northeast Scotland (Marquiss et al. 2003). Further expansion is predicted in these areas due to the apparent abundance of breeding habitat in the wider area, mainly coniferous forests which are relatively undisturbed and free from persecution (Forrester et al. 2007). 12.3.50 In Lothian and Borders (the most representative regional reference area to the Border Hills NHZ) during 2010, surveys by the Raptor Study Group found a total of 28 out of 58 known home ranges which were occupied by pairs. Breeding success in the 28 occupied home ranges was around 2.0 fledged young per nesting pair. This productivity figure is slightly higher than the Scottish average of 1.9 young per nesting pair (from 97 pairs checked), which although reasonably high at 82% success, was down on the previous three years recorded by the Scottish Raptor Monitoring Scheme. 12.3.51 A further 11 home ranges were identified which showed signs of occupancy by at least one bird (Etheridge et al. 2012). The NHZ breeding population is therefore at least 28 pairs. However, population estimates of goshawk are likely to be underestimates (Forrester et al. 2007) based on the species’ elusive behaviour (Murray et al. 1998). Therefore, given that the Lothian and Borders Raptor Study Group surveys will undoubtedly have missed some unknown breeding pairs, the breeding population is estimated to be in the region of 28-35 pairs. The total population is thus likely to be between 65-85 individual birds. 12 SNH Natural heritage Futures website (http://www.snh.gov.uk/about-snh/what-we-do/nhf/nhf-downloads/). March 2013 12-37 ES Chapter 12 Ornithology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

overwintering. For non-breeding or migratory species, consideration at a national scale is<br />

more appropriate than at regional level or lower.<br />

12.3.46 For breeding birds, the regional scale equates to SNH’s Natural Heritage Zones (NHZ) 12 ,<br />

where there is high biogeographical coherence within each zone. In this case, the proposed<br />

<strong>Camilty</strong> wind farm site just lies within the West Central Belt (NHZ 17) but is within 500 m of<br />

the Border Hills (NHZ 20) and 2 km of the Eastern Lowlands (NHZ 16). The extent of these<br />

NHZs and the location of the proposed wind farm site within/between them is presented in<br />

Figure 12.5. However, given the site’s location at the foot of the Pentland Hills, it is<br />

considered that the Border Hills NHZ more closely reflects the upland moorland and<br />

plantation habitat within and around the development site, and so is used as the primary<br />

reference population. Other populations (e.g. Scottish Raptor Study Group survey areas) will<br />

however be considered where appropriate.<br />

12.3.47 With regard to overwintering migratory species (e.g. pink-footed geese and greylag geese),<br />

SNH consider the national or migratory flyway population to be the most relevant<br />

geographical scale upon which to assess impacts in such species (SNH, 2006).<br />

12.3.48 In order to determine whether the conservation status of a species’ population will be<br />

adversely affected, it is necessary to obtain the best data on each VOR’s current population<br />

and recent trends. These are presented below.<br />

Goshawk<br />

12.3.49 Goshawk is listed in Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, although it is greenlisted<br />

in the latest BoCC report (Eaton et al. 2009) due to its expansion since the mid 20th<br />

century. There are thought to be approximately 400 pairs in the UK (Robinson, 2005), with at<br />

least 130 pairs in Scotland (Forrester et al. 2007). The population is slowly expanding from<br />

two main population clusters, one in the Borders and one in northeast Scotland (Marquiss et<br />

al. 2003). Further expansion is predicted in these areas due to the apparent abundance of<br />

breeding habitat in the wider area, mainly coniferous <strong>for</strong>ests which are relatively undisturbed<br />

and free from persecution (Forrester et al. 2007).<br />

12.3.50 In Lothian and Borders (the most representative regional reference area to the Border Hills<br />

NHZ) during 2010, surveys by the Raptor Study Group found a total of 28 out of 58 known<br />

home ranges which were occupied by pairs. Breeding success in the 28 occupied home<br />

ranges was around 2.0 fledged young per nesting pair. This productivity figure is slightly<br />

higher than the Scottish average of 1.9 young per nesting pair (from 97 pairs checked), which<br />

although reasonably high at 82% success, was down on the previous three years recorded<br />

by the Scottish Raptor Monitoring Scheme.<br />

12.3.51 A further 11 home ranges were identified which showed signs of occupancy by at least one<br />

bird (Etheridge et al. 2012). The NHZ breeding population is there<strong>for</strong>e at least 28 pairs.<br />

However, population estimates of goshawk are likely to be underestimates (Forrester et al.<br />

2007) based on the species’ elusive behaviour (Murray et al. 1998). There<strong>for</strong>e, given that the<br />

Lothian and Borders Raptor Study Group surveys will undoubtedly have missed some<br />

unknown breeding pairs, the breeding population is estimated to be in the region of 28-35<br />

pairs. The total population is thus likely to be between 65-85 individual birds.<br />

12 SNH Natural heritage Futures website (http://www.snh.gov.uk/about-snh/what-we-do/nhf/nhf-downloads/).<br />

March 2013 12-37 ES Chapter 12<br />

Ornithology<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!