07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Consultee Contact Response Section of<br />

chapter where<br />

point(s)<br />

addressed<br />

a significant effect on qualifying interests, an<br />

appropriate assessment will be required.<br />

15 January<br />

2013 e-mail<br />

response<br />

from Megan<br />

Jones<br />

Response to request <strong>for</strong> advice on Cumulative<br />

Impact Assessment (CIA) scope;<br />

With regard to the two main species of interest at<br />

<strong>Camilty</strong> (pink-footed goose and goshawk) SNH<br />

advised that different approaches were adopted <strong>for</strong><br />

each species due to their different behaviours and<br />

habitat requirements. Regarding pink-footed geese<br />

the CIA should address potential impacts on the<br />

Westwater SPA population, while impacts on<br />

goshawk should be investigated at the relevant<br />

Natural Heritage Zone (NHZ) level. Weblinks were<br />

provided to relevant guidance and advice on<br />

undertaking these assessments.<br />

The cumulative<br />

effects of the<br />

proposed <strong>Camilty</strong><br />

wind farm incombination<br />

with<br />

other wind farm<br />

developments is<br />

presented in the<br />

Cumulative<br />

Impact<br />

Assessment<br />

Section (12.8)<br />

Royal<br />

Society <strong>for</strong><br />

the<br />

Protection<br />

of Birds<br />

(RSPB)<br />

Scotland<br />

24 August<br />

2012 email<br />

from Mike<br />

Fraser<br />

(Lothian and<br />

Borders<br />

Conservation<br />

Officer)<br />

Satisfied with the scope of the ornithological<br />

surveys.<br />

Reference should be made to the on-going Southeast<br />

Scotland Bird Atlas project (http://www.thesoc.org.uk/se-atlas/)<br />

<strong>for</strong> recent in<strong>for</strong>mation on the<br />

distribution and status of species in the region.<br />

Concern was raised about Westwater Reservoir<br />

SPA, which is approximately 7 km south-east of<br />

<strong>Camilty</strong> and which supports a major roost of pinkfooted<br />

geese, with maximum counts of 64,000<br />

recorded in 2005-6, representing 21% of the<br />

national (UK) population.<br />

While <strong>Camilty</strong> may not lie on a recognised major<br />

flight path between feeding grounds and Westwater,<br />

it will be important to determine the direction and<br />

height of movement of birds leaving and returning to<br />

the roost under a variety of local cropping regimes<br />

and weather conditions. This will allow an<br />

assessment of any likely impact of the proposed<br />

wind farm on the SPA.<br />

Pink-footed geese may also roost at Cobbinshaw<br />

Reservoir, just west of <strong>Camilty</strong>, although numbers<br />

there have declined since peaking at more than<br />

5,000 in the early 1980s. Nevertheless, fieldwork<br />

will also be required to assess fully the birds’ current<br />

level of use of the reservoir and any potential impact<br />

on them of the proposed development.<br />

The ecological effects of the proposed development<br />

with existing, approved and planned windfarms in<br />

the area need to be addressed in terms of<br />

cumulative collision risk and displacement of birds.<br />

Consideration of<br />

the impacts on<br />

pink-footed geese<br />

in relation to<br />

Westwater SPA is<br />

presented in the<br />

Designated Sites<br />

(12.3.38 –<br />

12.3.41.) and<br />

Impact<br />

Assessment<br />

(12.7)Sections.<br />

Details of roost<br />

counts at<br />

Cobbinshaw<br />

Reservoir are<br />

provided in<br />

Baseline<br />

Conditions (see<br />

12.3.26).<br />

West<br />

Lothian<br />

Council<br />

7 September<br />

2012 Letter<br />

from Esme<br />

Clelland<br />

(Planning<br />

Officer)<br />

Stated that the council was satisfied with the<br />

methodology and assumptions made.<br />

The EIA must have sufficient in<strong>for</strong>mation to assess<br />

whether the proposal is likely to have a significant<br />

affect on the qualifying interests of any Natura 2000<br />

sites.<br />

Consideration of<br />

European<br />

designated sites is<br />

given throughout<br />

this Chapter as<br />

detailed above.<br />

March 2013 12-5 ES Chapter 12<br />

Ornithology<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!