07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Table 11.17 Potential Unmitigated Effects and Associated Level of Effects of<br />

Development Establishment on Terrestrial Habitats<br />

Habitat Type Sensitivity Magnitude Level of Effect (and Significance)<br />

Coniferous plantation woodland Low Large Moderate or Slight (not significant)<br />

Broadleaved woodland Low Negligible Negligible (not significant)<br />

Wet modified bog High Small Slight (not significant)<br />

Marshy grassland Low Negligible Negligible(not significant)<br />

Semi-improved acid grassland Low Negligible Negligible(not significant)<br />

Watercourses Low Negligible Negligible(not significant)<br />

11.6.19 The potential effects on the hydrology of the site, are dealt with in Chapter 13: Hydrology,<br />

Hydrogeology and Ground Conditions.<br />

Habitat Loss and Fragmentation <strong>for</strong> Terrestrial Protected Species<br />

11.6.20 The development will not result in the loss of large areas of habitat <strong>for</strong> the majority of the<br />

protected species detected on the site. The site contains sub-optimal <strong>for</strong>aging habitat <strong>for</strong><br />

otter and badger. The loss of coniferous plantation on site may improve the <strong>for</strong>aging habitat<br />

<strong>for</strong> otters on site by providing a larger diversity of habitats in proximity to the water courses.<br />

11.6.21 Where keyhole felling is employed, this will increase the area of <strong>for</strong>est edge which may<br />

enhance the potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>aging bats on site.<br />

11.6.22 Where keyhole felling is undertaken around the turbine locations, a buffer of 50 m from the<br />

proposed rotor blade tips to any feature used by bats has been employed (Appendix 11.5).<br />

Relevant habitat features are: <strong>for</strong>estry and woodland canopy edges, water courses, and<br />

ponds. Given the dimensions of the proposed turbines, the calculated minimum<br />

recommended distance between feature and turbine base is 86 m, based on a 25 m<br />

maximum tree height. This is in line with Natural England’s ‘Guidance on Bats and Onshore<br />

<strong>Wind</strong> Turbines’ document (2009). It is also recommended that habitats close to turbines<br />

should be managed to minimise its attractiveness to <strong>for</strong>aging bats, see mitigation and<br />

enhancement measures. No significant bat commuting routes were detected on the site and<br />

as such any impact due to fragmentation and habitat loss <strong>for</strong> commuting bats is likely to be<br />

negligible. No roosts were found within 500 m of any proposed turbine location, thus the<br />

development will have negligible effect upon local populations of roosting bats.<br />

11.6.23 The potential effect of habitat loss and fragmentation on terrestrial species is assessed in<br />

Table 11.18 below.<br />

March 2013 11-34 ES Chapter 11<br />

Terrestrial Ecology<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!