Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm Valued Ecological Receptor Covering Legislation and Guidance Summary Conservation Value Sensitivity pipistrelle) Under the Natural England guidance, soprano and common pipistrelles are classified as medium risk of collision with turbines. Scottish and UK populations of these species are considered robust. Taking this into consideration and the generally low numbers of bats detected across the site, it is considered that the site is of low value to bat populations. Badger This species is protected through the Protection of Badgers Act 1992. In Scotland, this legislation was updated by the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004. Evidence of badger activity was outside of the site. Further details of this can be found in the Protected Species Confidential Appendix. Local Low 11.6 Potential Significant Effects of the Scheme Prior to Mitigation Construction 11.6.1 The approach used in the assessment of effects has been described in the methodology section. There are a number of potential effects arising from activities related to the development of the proposed wind farm that may affect the nature conservation interest of the area and these are discussed below. Pollution of Designated Sites 11.6.2 The development of the proposed wind farm has limited potential to affect the designated sites as the catchment area of the wind farm site does not link with any of the designated sites and should thus not affect their hydrology. The site is located within the Linhouse Water catchment. The Linhouse Water is a tributary of the River Almond which ultimately drains into the Firth of Forth near Cramond, Edinburgh. The majority of the site is drained through the Crosswood Burn, a headwater of the Camilty Water. 11.6.3 The effect of the development on site hydrology and the effects associated with this are detailed further in Chapter 13: Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Ground Conditions of this ES. The effects below take into consideration the informed design of the development (Chapter 3: Design Evolution). The potential effect of this pollution is shown below in Table 11.11. Table 11.11 Potential Unmitigated Effects and Associated Level of Effects of Pollution on Designated Sites Designated Site Sensitivity Magnitude Level of Effect (and significance) Craigengar SAC and SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant) Cobbinshaw Moss SSSI High Negligible Negligible(not significant) Cobbinshaw reservoir SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant) Linhouse valley SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant) Hermand Birchwood SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant) March 2013 11-29 ES Chapter 11 Terrestrial Ecology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm Designated Site Sensitivity Magnitude Level of Effect (and significance) Crosswood reservoir and Linhouse Water Low Negligible Negligible (not significant) SWT Wildlife Site Murieston Water SWT Wildlife Site Low Negligible Negligible (not significant) Pollution of Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitats 11.6.4 Pollution can arise in the form of fine sediment dusts and sedimentation of surface water runoff associated with earthworks, as well as from the release of environmentally hazardous chemicals (e.g. fuels and oils from construction plant). This has the potential to result in the loss of vegetation and/or alteration of substrate chemistry, which can result in detrimental changes to vegetation communities in the longer-term. Taking into consideration the likelihood of this occurring and the limited reach of these possible effects, the potential magnitude of this effect is assessed as being of a small magnitude. With habitats on site considered to be of low sensitivity (with the exception of wet modified bog of high sensitivity), the overall level of effect is considered to be negligible and slight (Table 11.12). Table 11.12 Potential Unmitigated Effects and Associated Level of Effects of Pollution on Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitats Terrestrial Habitat Sensitivity Magnitude Level of Effect (and significance) Coniferous plantation woodland Low Small Negligible (not significant) Broadleaved woodland Low Small Negligible (not significant) Wet modified bog High Small Slight (not significant) Marshy grassland Low Small Negligible (not significant) Semi-improved acid grassland Low Small Negligible (not significant) Watercourses Low Small Negligible (not significant) Effects of Pollution on Terrestrial Species 11.6.5 During construction there is the potential for protected species to be affected as a result of a variety of pollution incidents. These impacts not only have the potential to damage habitats directly, but also to indirectly affect populations of species, such as otters and bats, through the alteration of prey resource availability. The potential effect of this pollution on terrestrial protected species is shown below in Table 11.13. 11.6.6 No badger setts were found within the site boundary/turbine envelope, and therefore the magnitude of effect is considered to be negligible. 11.6.7 Otter presence was been noted along water courses running through the site and thus could potentially be found throughout the entire site. Pollution effects could be substantial for otter if water courses are affected (through e.g. run off of contaminated water into riparian habitats) and are considered to be of a medium magnitude. March 2013 11-30 ES Chapter 11 Terrestrial Ecology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 278 and 279: Camilty Wind Farm of effect of the
- Page 280 and 281: Camilty Wind Farm Other SMs 10.5.28
- Page 282 and 283: Camilty Wind Farm is of high import
- Page 284 and 285: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.57 The liste
- Page 286 and 287: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.74 Some 5 km
- Page 288 and 289: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.90 The house
- Page 290 and 291: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.106 HB numbe
- Page 292 and 293: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.5 Summar
- Page 294 and 295: Camilty Wind Farm included in Appen
- Page 296 and 297: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.6 Summar
- Page 298 and 299: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 300 and 301: Camilty Wind Farm 11 Terrestrial Ec
- Page 302 and 303: Camilty Wind Farm 11.2 Methodology
- Page 304 and 305: Camilty Wind Farm Consultee Date of
- Page 306 and 307: Camilty Wind Farm Bat Species 11.2.
- Page 308 and 309: Camilty Wind Farm Index (HSI) devel
- Page 310 and 311: Camilty Wind Farm Conservation Sens
- Page 312 and 313: Camilty Wind Farm Table 11.6 Design
- Page 314 and 315: Camilty Wind Farm 11.3.8 There were
- Page 316 and 317: Camilty Wind Farm 11.3.16 Marshy gr
- Page 318 and 319: Camilty Wind Farm NVC Code NVC Type
- Page 320 and 321: Camilty Wind Farm was also detected
- Page 322 and 323: Camilty Wind Farm remaining 38% wer
- Page 324 and 325: Camilty Wind Farm Badger Legal Prot
- Page 326 and 327: Camilty Wind Farm current landuse i
- Page 330 and 331: Camilty Wind Farm 11.6.8 Bat activi
- Page 332 and 333: Camilty Wind Farm Table 11.16 Areas
- Page 334 and 335: Camilty Wind Farm Table 11.18 Poten
- Page 336 and 337: Camilty Wind Farm Table 11.20 Poten
- Page 338 and 339: Camilty Wind Farm Siltbusters or eq
- Page 340 and 341: Camilty Wind Farm 11.9 Cumulative E
- Page 342 and 343: Camilty Wind Farm 11.9.22 It is con
- Page 344 and 345: Camilty Wind Farm Table 11.22 Summa
- Page 346 and 347: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 348 and 349: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 350 and 351: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 352 and 353: Camilty Wind Farm • NBN Gateway W
- Page 354 and 355: Camilty Wind Farm 12.2 Methodology
- Page 356 and 357: Camilty Wind Farm activity, particu
- Page 358 and 359: Camilty Wind Farm 12.2.10 In additi
- Page 360 and 361: Camilty Wind Farm Flight Activity S
- Page 362 and 363: Camilty Wind Farm (ii) For a sample
- Page 364 and 365: Camilty Wind Farm 12.2.40 The Town
- Page 366 and 367: Camilty Wind Farm Level of Effect S
- Page 368 and 369: Camilty Wind Farm Table 12.8 Desk-b
- Page 370 and 371: Camilty Wind Farm Table 12.10 Fligh
- Page 372 and 373: Camilty Wind Farm 12.3.19 All speci
- Page 374 and 375: Camilty Wind Farm Table 12.13 Speci
- Page 376 and 377: Camilty Wind Farm Collision Risk Mo
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
Valued<br />
Ecological<br />
Receptor<br />
Covering Legislation and Guidance Summary<br />
Conservation<br />
Value<br />
Sensitivity<br />
pipistrelle)<br />
Under the Natural England guidance, soprano and<br />
common pipistrelles are classified as medium risk of<br />
collision with turbines. Scottish and UK populations of<br />
these species are considered robust. Taking this into<br />
consideration and the generally low numbers of bats<br />
detected across the site, it is considered that the site<br />
is of low value to bat populations.<br />
Badger<br />
This species is protected through the Protection of<br />
Badgers Act 1992. In Scotland, this legislation was<br />
updated by the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act<br />
2004.<br />
Evidence of badger activity was outside of the site.<br />
Further details of this can be found in the Protected<br />
Species Confidential Appendix.<br />
Local<br />
Low<br />
11.6 Potential Significant Effects of the Scheme Prior to Mitigation<br />
Construction<br />
11.6.1 The approach used in the assessment of effects has been described in the methodology<br />
section. There are a number of potential effects arising from activities related to the<br />
development of the proposed wind farm that may affect the nature conservation interest of<br />
the area and these are discussed below.<br />
Pollution of Designated Sites<br />
11.6.2 The development of the proposed wind farm has limited potential to affect the designated<br />
sites as the catchment area of the wind farm site does not link with any of the designated<br />
sites and should thus not affect their hydrology. The site is located within the Linhouse Water<br />
catchment. The Linhouse Water is a tributary of the River Almond which ultimately drains<br />
into the Firth of Forth near Cramond, Edinburgh. The majority of the site is drained through<br />
the Crosswood Burn, a headwater of the <strong>Camilty</strong> Water.<br />
11.6.3 The effect of the development on site hydrology and the effects associated with this are<br />
detailed further in Chapter 13: Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Ground Conditions of this ES.<br />
The effects below take into consideration the in<strong>for</strong>med design of the development (Chapter<br />
3: Design Evolution). The potential effect of this pollution is shown below in Table 11.11.<br />
Table 11.11 Potential Unmitigated Effects and Associated Level of Effects of Pollution<br />
on Designated Sites<br />
Designated Site Sensitivity Magnitude Level of Effect (and significance)<br />
Craigengar SAC and SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant)<br />
Cobbinshaw Moss SSSI High Negligible Negligible(not significant)<br />
Cobbinshaw reservoir SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant)<br />
Linhouse valley SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant)<br />
Hermand Birchwood SSSI High Negligible Negligible (not significant)<br />
March 2013 11-29 ES Chapter 11<br />
Terrestrial Ecology<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©