Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm of effect of the proposed wind farm would be no change and the effect on the asset would be none. 10.5.11 The Harburn Tile Works (HER number 50332) is shown on the first edition six-inch OS map of 1853 and again on the edition of 1864. The site was located on the north side of the A70 road near its junction with the B7008 road to Harburn. Post Second World War editions of the OS show the pits as being a marshy area with small ponds. Other than these features, nothing is now visible above ground. 10.5.12 The existing forestry track to be used for the construction of the proposed wind farm crosses the location of the Harburn Tile Works Buildings, while the proposed construction compound is located at the location of the former pits. The site is of low importance. The magnitude of effect of the proposed wind farm would be small and there would be a slight adverse effect on the asset. Effects on the Site During Operation: Indirect Visual Effects on the Setting of Historic Assets Core Study Area (1.5 km outside boundary of proposed wind farm) Artefacts 10.5.13 There is a low level scatter of prehistoric artefacts known in the vicinity of the proposed wind arm. A flint scraper was found in a location immediately south of the A70 road (HER number 17937), while a barbed-and-tanged flint arrowhead found at Brookbank, some 390 m east of the boundary of the proposed wind farm (HER number 17938). In addition, a small, worn Middle Bronze Age flanged axe or chisel has been found while metal detecting immediately south of the A70 road (HER number 18284). These assets are of low importance. The magnitude of effect of the proposed wind farm would be no change and the effect on the assets would be none. Scheduled Monuments 10.5.14 There is a total of 3 SMs within 1.5 km of the proposed wind farm and within the ZTV. All three are immediately adjacent to the boundary of the proposed wind farm. They are, SM1933 Camilty Hill, Roman fortlet, Castle Greg, SM1165 Camilty Hill, enclosure, Harburn and SM 11245 Crosswood, cairn 750m SE of. Camilty Hill, Roman Fortlet, Castle Greg 10.5.15 SM1933, HER number 17932, Camilty Hill, Roman fortlet, Castle Greg represents the remains of a small Roman fortlet, probably of Flavian (c. AD95-AD105) date (Frere 1989: 271). The Roman fortlet SM is of high importance. 10.5.16 The Roman fortlet is located just below the summit of the hill at Castle Greg, on its south side. In a scoping response letter of 5 th September 2012, Historic Scotland notes that the fortlet appears to be positioned to command views to the NE and E; it sits on the crest of a NE facing slope and the single entrance to the fortlet faces this direction. 10.5.17 An examination of local topography and consultation with Historic Scotland has indicated that the likely major route would have been along the line of the current A70 road, although the Roman road system in the area is poorly understood, largely due to lack of surviving or available evidence. March 2013 10-18 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.18 A possible Roman road from Craiglockhart to Castle Greg to Castledykes is associated with the Roman fortlet (HER number 18248) and in the vicinity of the fortlet unsuccessful attempts have been made to locate it running from the southwest to north-east past the south-eastern corner of the fortlet. This road is not visible on recent aerial photographs and could not be traced within the adjacent forestry plantation. 10.5.19 The fortlet was probably located to protect the either the possible Roman road following the alignment of the current A70 and/ or the possible associated road running from the fort’s southwest to north-east and/or to provide security to the wider area. 10.5.20 The setting of the SM is currently constricted by the surrounding plantation woodland, in particular to the north and east, although there is a view towards the Pentland Hills towards the southeast. The current setting seems unlikely to reflect that at the time of the forts construction and does not make a major contribution to the importance of the SM. A series of photomontages (Figure 10.5a-d) show the current and proposed position. 10.5.21 To the north the setting of the SM is effectively constrained by the plantation woodland some 150 metres away. Views from the SM to the north would remain unchanged in the proposed view. 10.5.22 To the northeast, the setting of the SM is constricted by plantation woodland some 20 metres away and there are no distant views. The blades of Turbine 2 would be visible in the proposed view to the northeast. 10.5.23 To the east there is currently a restricted view of the Pentland Hills through a ride through the woodland. This view is mostly obtained over further woodland, depending on the position of the viewer. The blades of Turbine 3 and the blades and the upper part of the tower of Turbine 4 would be visible in the proposed view in this direction when the viewer was positioned in many parts of the SM. The blades and the upper part of the tower of Turbine 3 would be visible in the view when the viewer was positioned in the south-easternmost part of the SM. The woodland coup to the east of the SM is to be retained and is designated for delayed felling in an amendment to the Forest Plan. 10.5.24 To the south, the existing view is relatively open and looks across the B7008 road towards plantation woodland. The view is towards the alignment of the possible Roman road from Craiglockhart to Castle Greg to Castledykes. The blades of one turbine (Turbine 1) would be visible at the eastern edge of the proposed view on the basis of present forestry cover, while the blades and the upper part of the tower of Turbine 1 would be visible in the proposed view after 2018 and would be similar in scale to Turbine 4. 10.5.25 To the west, views are currently relatively open. These views would remain unchanged in the proposed view. 10.5.26 There would be no physical effect on the SM. The proposed wind farm would result in visual changes. These changes would alter the setting of the SM. These changes would apply only to views towards the east and south-east. In these directions turbines, or parts of turbines would be visible and screening through the retention of forestry would minimise the visibility of turbines. The visual changes would affect the setting of the SM materially but not fundamentally, in that turbines would not screen any currently available views. On this basis the ability of the setting of the SM to be understood would be moderately compromised. 10.5.27 The level of effect is therefore assessed as medium, but towards the lower end of that range. The effect of the proposed wind farm on the SM is moderate adverse. March 2013 10-19 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 228 and 229: Camilty Wind Farm from negligible t
- Page 230 and 231: Camilty Wind Farm visible above int
- Page 232 and 233: Camilty Wind Farm slightly diminish
- Page 234 and 235: Camilty Wind Farm forestry. The pro
- Page 236 and 237: Camilty Wind Farm 9.5.118 At night
- Page 238 and 239: Camilty Wind Farm hills, although t
- Page 240 and 241: Camilty Wind Farm gained. The propo
- Page 242 and 243: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 244 and 245: Camilty Wind Farm Analysis of the L
- Page 246 and 247: Camilty Wind Farm have an effect on
- Page 248 and 249: Camilty Wind Farm the additional cu
- Page 250 and 251: Camilty Wind Farm associated with p
- Page 252 and 253: Camilty Wind Farm Plantation, would
- Page 254 and 255: Camilty Wind Farm to the south west
- Page 256 and 257: Camilty Wind Farm Moderate addition
- Page 258 and 259: Camilty Wind Farm Glasgow. A smalle
- Page 260 and 261: Camilty Wind Farm • Topic Paper 9
- Page 262 and 263: Camilty Wind Farm largely to avoid
- Page 264 and 265: Camilty Wind Farm 10.2.14 An assess
- Page 266 and 267: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.2 Guide
- Page 268 and 269: Camilty Wind Farm Asset Importance
- Page 270 and 271: Camilty Wind Farm historic landscap
- Page 272 and 273: Camilty Wind Farm • Stage Two: de
- Page 274 and 275: Camilty Wind Farm Baseline Conditio
- Page 276 and 277: Camilty Wind Farm 10.4.2 The most s
- Page 280 and 281: Camilty Wind Farm Other SMs 10.5.28
- Page 282 and 283: Camilty Wind Farm is of high import
- Page 284 and 285: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.57 The liste
- Page 286 and 287: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.74 Some 5 km
- Page 288 and 289: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.90 The house
- Page 290 and 291: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.106 HB numbe
- Page 292 and 293: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.5 Summar
- Page 294 and 295: Camilty Wind Farm included in Appen
- Page 296 and 297: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.6 Summar
- Page 298 and 299: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 300 and 301: Camilty Wind Farm 11 Terrestrial Ec
- Page 302 and 303: Camilty Wind Farm 11.2 Methodology
- Page 304 and 305: Camilty Wind Farm Consultee Date of
- Page 306 and 307: Camilty Wind Farm Bat Species 11.2.
- Page 308 and 309: Camilty Wind Farm Index (HSI) devel
- Page 310 and 311: Camilty Wind Farm Conservation Sens
- Page 312 and 313: Camilty Wind Farm Table 11.6 Design
- Page 314 and 315: Camilty Wind Farm 11.3.8 There were
- Page 316 and 317: Camilty Wind Farm 11.3.16 Marshy gr
- Page 318 and 319: Camilty Wind Farm NVC Code NVC Type
- Page 320 and 321: Camilty Wind Farm was also detected
- Page 322 and 323: Camilty Wind Farm remaining 38% wer
- Page 324 and 325: Camilty Wind Farm Badger Legal Prot
- Page 326 and 327: Camilty Wind Farm current landuse i
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
of effect of the proposed wind farm would be no change and the effect on the asset would be<br />
none.<br />
10.5.11 The Harburn Tile Works (HER number 50332) is shown on the first edition six-inch OS map<br />
of 1853 and again on the edition of 1864. The site was located on the north side of the A70<br />
road near its junction with the B7008 road to Harburn. Post Second World War editions of the<br />
OS show the pits as being a marshy area with small ponds. Other than these features,<br />
nothing is now visible above ground.<br />
10.5.12 The existing <strong>for</strong>estry track to be used <strong>for</strong> the construction of the proposed wind farm crosses<br />
the location of the Harburn Tile Works Buildings, while the proposed construction compound<br />
is located at the location of the <strong>for</strong>mer pits. The site is of low importance. The magnitude of<br />
effect of the proposed wind farm would be small and there would be a slight adverse effect on<br />
the asset.<br />
Effects on the Site During Operation: Indirect Visual Effects on the Setting of<br />
Historic Assets<br />
Core Study Area (1.5 km outside boundary of proposed wind farm)<br />
Artefacts<br />
10.5.13 There is a low level scatter of prehistoric artefacts known in the vicinity of the proposed wind<br />
arm. A flint scraper was found in a location immediately south of the A70 road (HER number<br />
17937), while a barbed-and-tanged flint arrowhead found at Brookbank, some 390 m east of<br />
the boundary of the proposed wind farm (HER number 17938). In addition, a small, worn<br />
Middle Bronze Age flanged axe or chisel has been found while metal detecting immediately<br />
south of the A70 road (HER number 18284). These assets are of low importance. The<br />
magnitude of effect of the proposed wind farm would be no change and the effect on the<br />
assets would be none.<br />
Scheduled Monuments<br />
10.5.14 There is a total of 3 SMs within 1.5 km of the proposed wind farm and within the ZTV. All<br />
three are immediately adjacent to the boundary of the proposed wind farm. They are,<br />
SM1933 <strong>Camilty</strong> Hill, Roman <strong>for</strong>tlet, Castle Greg, SM1165 <strong>Camilty</strong> Hill, enclosure, Harburn<br />
and SM 11245 Crosswood, cairn 750m SE of.<br />
<strong>Camilty</strong> Hill, Roman Fortlet, Castle Greg<br />
10.5.15 SM1933, HER number 17932, <strong>Camilty</strong> Hill, Roman <strong>for</strong>tlet, Castle Greg represents the<br />
remains of a small Roman <strong>for</strong>tlet, probably of Flavian (c. AD95-AD105) date (Frere 1989:<br />
271). The Roman <strong>for</strong>tlet SM is of high importance.<br />
10.5.16 The Roman <strong>for</strong>tlet is located just below the summit of the hill at Castle Greg, on its south<br />
side. In a scoping response letter of 5 th September 2012, Historic Scotland notes that the<br />
<strong>for</strong>tlet appears to be positioned to command views to the NE and E; it sits on the crest of a<br />
NE facing slope and the single entrance to the <strong>for</strong>tlet faces this direction.<br />
10.5.17 An examination of local topography and consultation with Historic Scotland has indicated that<br />
the likely major route would have been along the line of the current A70 road, although the<br />
Roman road system in the area is poorly understood, largely due to lack of surviving or<br />
available evidence.<br />
March 2013 10-18 ES Chapter 10<br />
Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©