Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm historic landscapes. Additional methodology regarding the assessment of effects on settings is provided below. 10.2.40 Effect magnitude is adapted from that defined in DMRB (Volume 11, Section 3, Annex 7) as: Large Medium Small Change to most or all key historic landscape elements, parcels or components; extreme visual effects; gross change of noise or change to sound quality; fundamental changes to use or access; resulting in total change to historic landscape character unit. Changes to many key historic landscape elements, parcels or components; visual change to many key aspects of the historic landscape; noticeable differences in noise or sound quality; considerable changes to use or access; resulting in moderate changes to historic landscape character. Changes to few key historic landscape elements, parcels or components; slight visual changes to few key aspects of historic landscape; limited changes to noise levels or sound quality; slight changes to use or access; resulting in limited changes to historic landscape character. Negligible Very minor changes to key historic landscape elements, parcels or components; virtually unchanged visual effects; very slight changes in noise levels or sound quality; very slight changes to use or access; resulting in a very small change to historic landscape character. No change No change to elements, parcels or components; no visual or audible changes; no changes arising from amenity or community factors. 10.2.41 The level of effects is a combination of the value of the resource or asset and the magnitude of effect on that resource or asset. Effects can be adverse or beneficial, and temporary or permanent. Beneficial effects are those that mitigate existing effects and help to restore or enhance heritage assets, allowing for greater understanding and appreciation. Temporary effects are those that cause a change to the baseline for a limited period of time, as opposed to permanent effects, which will not cease when the activity in question does, causing an irreversible change to the baseline.. In line with Guidance Note 208/07 (DMRB Volume 11, Section 3, Annex 7) the following matrix shown in Table 11.5 is used for all three sub-topics. Table 10.4 Cultural Heritage: Level of Effects Matrix Importance or Sensitivity of Receptor HIGH MEDIUM LOW NEGLIGIBLE Magnitude of Change LARGE MEDIUM Very substantial or substantial Substantial or moderate Substantial or moderate Moderate or slight Negligible Moderate Slight Negligible SMALL Moderate or slight Slight Slight or negligible Negligible NEGLIGIBLE Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible NO CHANGE None None None None March 2013 10-10 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Camilty Wind Farm 10.2.42 Where the matrix provides a split in the level of effects, e.g. Moderate/Slight, the assessor will exercise professional judgement in determining which of the levels is more appropriate. 10.2.43 Moderate or greater effects are considered to be significant for the purposes of the EIA Regulations. As indicated above, however, the level of effect resulting from a particular combination of magnitude and sensitivity is subject to a degree of professional judgement taking into account site-specific considerations. Setting 10.2.44 The Scottish Historic Environment Policy (SHEP) (paragraph 1.2) notes that “The context or setting in which specific historic features sit and the patterns of past use are part of our historic environment. The historical, artistic, literary, linguistic, and scenic associations of places and landscapes are some of the less tangible elements of the historic environment. These elements make a fundamental contribution to our sense of place and cultural identity”. 10.2.45 In addition, Historic Scotland has published a guidance note on setting entitled ‘Managing Change in the Historic Environment – Setting’ (Historic Scotland, 2010). 10.2.46 This guidance notes that: “Setting should be thought of as the way in which the surroundings of a historic asset or place contribute to how it is experienced, understood and appreciated…Monuments, buildings, gardens and settlements were not constructed in isolation. They were often deliberately positioned with reference to the surrounding topography, resources, landscape and other monuments or buildings. These relationships will often have changed through the life of a historic asset or place…Setting often extends beyond the immediate property boundary of a historic structure into the broader landscape”. 10.2.47 The setting of a historic asset can incorporate a range of factors, not all of which will apply in every case. These include: • Current landscape or townscape context; • Visual envelope, incorporating views to, from and across the historic asset or place; • Key vistas, framed by rows of trees, buildings or natural features that give an asset or place a context, whether intentional or not; • The prominence of the historic asset or place in views throughout the surrounding area; • Character of the surrounding landscape; • General and specific views including foregrounds and backdrops; • Relationships between both built and natural features; • Aesthetic qualities; • Other non-visual factors such as historical, artistic, literary, linguistic, or scenic associations, intellectual relationships (e.g. to a theory, plan or design), or sensory factors; • A ‘Sense of Place’: the overall effect formed by the above factors. 10.2.48 There are three stages in assessing the effect of a development on the setting of a historic asset or place: • Stage One: identify the historic assets that might be affected by a proposed change; March 2013 10-11 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

10.2.42 Where the matrix provides a split in the level of effects, e.g. Moderate/Slight, the assessor will<br />

exercise professional judgement in determining which of the levels is more appropriate.<br />

10.2.43 Moderate or greater effects are considered to be significant <strong>for</strong> the purposes of the EIA<br />

Regulations. As indicated above, however, the level of effect resulting from a particular<br />

combination of magnitude and sensitivity is subject to a degree of professional judgement<br />

taking into account site-specific considerations.<br />

Setting<br />

10.2.44 The Scottish Historic Environment Policy (SHEP) (paragraph 1.2) notes that “The context or<br />

setting in which specific historic features sit and the patterns of past use are part of our<br />

historic environment. The historical, artistic, literary, linguistic, and scenic associations of<br />

places and landscapes are some of the less tangible elements of the historic environment.<br />

These elements make a fundamental contribution to our sense of place and cultural identity”.<br />

10.2.45 In addition, Historic Scotland has published a guidance note on setting entitled ‘Managing<br />

Change in the Historic Environment – Setting’ (Historic Scotland, 2010).<br />

10.2.46 This guidance notes that: “Setting should be thought of as the way in which the surroundings<br />

of a historic asset or place contribute to how it is experienced, understood and<br />

appreciated…Monuments, buildings, gardens and settlements were not constructed in<br />

isolation. They were often deliberately positioned with reference to the surrounding<br />

topography, resources, landscape and other monuments or buildings. These relationships<br />

will often have changed through the life of a historic asset or place…Setting often extends<br />

beyond the immediate property boundary of a historic structure into the broader landscape”.<br />

10.2.47 The setting of a historic asset can incorporate a range of factors, not all of which will apply in<br />

every case. These include:<br />

• Current landscape or townscape context;<br />

• Visual envelope, incorporating views to, from and across the historic asset or place;<br />

• Key vistas, framed by rows of trees, buildings or natural features that give an asset or<br />

place a context, whether intentional or not;<br />

• The prominence of the historic asset or place in views throughout the surrounding<br />

area;<br />

• Character of the surrounding landscape;<br />

• General and specific views including <strong>for</strong>egrounds and backdrops;<br />

• Relationships between both built and natural features;<br />

• Aesthetic qualities;<br />

• Other non-visual factors such as historical, artistic, literary, linguistic, or scenic<br />

associations, intellectual relationships (e.g. to a theory, plan or design), or sensory<br />

factors;<br />

• A ‘Sense of Place’: the overall effect <strong>for</strong>med by the above factors.<br />

10.2.48 There are three stages in assessing the effect of a development on the setting of a historic<br />

asset or place:<br />

• Stage One: identify the historic assets that might be affected by a proposed change;<br />

March 2013 10-11 ES Chapter 10<br />

Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!