Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm Asset Importance Medium Low Negligible Example Designated special historic landscapes; Undesignated historic landscapes that would justify special historic landscape designation, landscapes of regional sensitivity; Averagely well-preserved historic landscapes with reasonable coherence, timedepth, or other critical factors. Robust undesignated historic landscapes; Historic landscapes with specific and substantial importance to local interest groups, but with limited sensitivity; Historic landscapes whose sensitivity is limited by poor preservation and/or poor survival of contextual associations; Robust historic landscapes. Landscapes with little or no significant historical interest. Assessment of Effect Magnitude - Archaeological Remains 10.2.32 The magnitude of effect is assessed without regard to the value of the resource. In terms of the judgement of the magnitude of effect, this is based on the principle (first established in NPPG 5) that preservation of the resource is preferred, and that total physical loss of the resource is the least preferred. 10.2.33 It is not always possible to assess the physical effect in terms of percentage loss, and therefore it is important in such cases to try to assess the capacity of the resource to retain its character following any effect. Similarly, effects on the setting of archaeological remains may also be more difficult to assess as they do not involve physical loss of the resource, and they only apply for the life/presence of the development and thus are reversible in most cases. 10.2.34 Impact magnitude is adapted from that defined in the DMRB (Volume 11, Section 3, Annex 5) as: Large Change to most, or all, key archaeological elements, such that the resource is totally altered. Comprehensive changes to setting (such changes would fundamentally change the setting of the archaeological element such that its ability to be understood was severely compromised). Medium Changes to many key archaeological elements, such that the resource is clearly modified. Material changes to setting (such changes would change the setting materially but not fundamentally, such that its ability to be understood would be moderately compromised). Small Changes to key archaeological elements, such that the resource is slightly altered. Slight changes to setting (such changes would be detectable but would not fundamentally or materially compromise the ability to understand the setting). Negligible Very minor changes to elements or setting (such changes would be barely perceptible and would not affect the ability to understand the setting). March 2013 10-8 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm No change No change. 10.2.35 Additional methodology regarding the assessment of effects on settings is provided below in the section on ‘setting’. Assessment of Effect Magnitude - Historic Buildings 10.2.36 The magnitude of effect is assessed without regard to the value of the resource, so the total loss of a less significant building would have the same degree of effect as the total loss of a high value building. In terms of the judgement of the magnitude of effect, this is based on the principle that preservation of the resource and its setting is preferred, and that total physical loss of the resource is the least preferred. 10.2.37 Effects on the setting of historic buildings may include vibration, noise and lighting issues as well as visual effects, and may be reversible. Additional methodology regarding the assessment of effects on settings is provided below in the section on ‘setting’. 10.2.38 Effect magnitude is adapted from that defined in the DMRB (Volume 11 Section 3, Annex 6) as: Large Change to key historic building elements, such that the resource is totally altered. Total change to the setting (where the scope or extent of the change is so fundamental that the ability to understand the setting of the historic building is severely compromised). Medium Change to many key historic building elements, such that the resource is significantly modified. Changes to the setting of an historic building, such that it is significantly modified (such changes would change the setting of the historic building materially but not fundamentally, such that its ability to be understood would be moderately compromised). Small Changes to key historic building elements, such that the asset is slightly different. Change to the setting of an historic building, such that it is noticeably changed (such changes would be detectable but not fundamentally or materially change the setting or its ability to be understood). Negligible Slight changes to historic building elements or setting that hardly affect it (such changes would be barely perceptible and would not affect the ability to understand the setting). No change No change to fabric or setting. Assessment of Effect Magnitude - Historic Landscape 10.2.39 Historic landscapes cannot be destroyed or damaged by wind energy development but effects on them can change their character before the wind farm is decommissioned. Effects should be assessed using evaluated historic landscape character units, not the elements/parcels/components that contribute towards the character (paragraph 10.2.28). There may be effects on the setting of identified units, especially with regard to designated March 2013 10-9 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 218 and 219: Camilty Wind Farm Residential Prope
- Page 220 and 221: Camilty Wind Farm to a small magnit
- Page 222 and 223: Camilty Wind Farm the form of light
- Page 224 and 225: Camilty Wind Farm Landscape Charact
- Page 226 and 227: Camilty Wind Farm these Lowland Pla
- Page 228 and 229: Camilty Wind Farm from negligible t
- Page 230 and 231: Camilty Wind Farm visible above int
- Page 232 and 233: Camilty Wind Farm slightly diminish
- Page 234 and 235: Camilty Wind Farm forestry. The pro
- Page 236 and 237: Camilty Wind Farm 9.5.118 At night
- Page 238 and 239: Camilty Wind Farm hills, although t
- Page 240 and 241: Camilty Wind Farm gained. The propo
- Page 242 and 243: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 244 and 245: Camilty Wind Farm Analysis of the L
- Page 246 and 247: Camilty Wind Farm have an effect on
- Page 248 and 249: Camilty Wind Farm the additional cu
- Page 250 and 251: Camilty Wind Farm associated with p
- Page 252 and 253: Camilty Wind Farm Plantation, would
- Page 254 and 255: Camilty Wind Farm to the south west
- Page 256 and 257: Camilty Wind Farm Moderate addition
- Page 258 and 259: Camilty Wind Farm Glasgow. A smalle
- Page 260 and 261: Camilty Wind Farm • Topic Paper 9
- Page 262 and 263: Camilty Wind Farm largely to avoid
- Page 264 and 265: Camilty Wind Farm 10.2.14 An assess
- Page 266 and 267: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.2 Guide
- Page 270 and 271: Camilty Wind Farm historic landscap
- Page 272 and 273: Camilty Wind Farm • Stage Two: de
- Page 274 and 275: Camilty Wind Farm Baseline Conditio
- Page 276 and 277: Camilty Wind Farm 10.4.2 The most s
- Page 278 and 279: Camilty Wind Farm of effect of the
- Page 280 and 281: Camilty Wind Farm Other SMs 10.5.28
- Page 282 and 283: Camilty Wind Farm is of high import
- Page 284 and 285: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.57 The liste
- Page 286 and 287: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.74 Some 5 km
- Page 288 and 289: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.90 The house
- Page 290 and 291: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.106 HB numbe
- Page 292 and 293: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.5 Summar
- Page 294 and 295: Camilty Wind Farm included in Appen
- Page 296 and 297: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.6 Summar
- Page 298 and 299: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 300 and 301: Camilty Wind Farm 11 Terrestrial Ec
- Page 302 and 303: Camilty Wind Farm 11.2 Methodology
- Page 304 and 305: Camilty Wind Farm Consultee Date of
- Page 306 and 307: Camilty Wind Farm Bat Species 11.2.
- Page 308 and 309: Camilty Wind Farm Index (HSI) devel
- Page 310 and 311: Camilty Wind Farm Conservation Sens
- Page 312 and 313: Camilty Wind Farm Table 11.6 Design
- Page 314 and 315: Camilty Wind Farm 11.3.8 There were
- Page 316 and 317: Camilty Wind Farm 11.3.16 Marshy gr
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
No change No change.<br />
10.2.35 Additional methodology regarding the assessment of effects on settings is provided below in<br />
the section on ‘setting’.<br />
Assessment of Effect Magnitude - Historic Buildings<br />
10.2.36 The magnitude of effect is assessed without regard to the value of the resource, so the total<br />
loss of a less significant building would have the same degree of effect as the total loss of a<br />
high value building. In terms of the judgement of the magnitude of effect, this is based on the<br />
principle that preservation of the resource and its setting is preferred, and that total physical<br />
loss of the resource is the least preferred.<br />
10.2.37 Effects on the setting of historic buildings may include vibration, noise and lighting issues as<br />
well as visual effects, and may be reversible. Additional methodology regarding the<br />
assessment of effects on settings is provided below in the section on ‘setting’.<br />
10.2.38 Effect magnitude is adapted from that defined in the DMRB (Volume 11 Section 3, Annex 6)<br />
as:<br />
Large<br />
Change to key historic building elements, such that the resource is totally<br />
altered.<br />
Total change to the setting (where the scope or extent of the change is so<br />
fundamental that the ability to understand the setting of the historic building is<br />
severely compromised).<br />
Medium<br />
Change to many key historic building elements, such that the resource is<br />
significantly modified.<br />
Changes to the setting of an historic building, such that it is significantly modified<br />
(such changes would change the setting of the historic building materially but not<br />
fundamentally, such that its ability to be understood would be moderately<br />
compromised).<br />
Small<br />
Changes to key historic building elements, such that the asset is slightly<br />
different.<br />
Change to the setting of an historic building, such that it is noticeably changed<br />
(such changes would be detectable but not fundamentally or materially change<br />
the setting or its ability to be understood).<br />
Negligible Slight changes to historic building elements or setting that hardly affect it (such<br />
changes would be barely perceptible and would not affect the ability to<br />
understand the setting).<br />
No change No change to fabric or setting.<br />
Assessment of Effect Magnitude - Historic Landscape<br />
10.2.39 Historic landscapes cannot be destroyed or damaged by wind energy development but<br />
effects on them can change their character be<strong>for</strong>e the wind farm is decommissioned. Effects<br />
should be assessed using evaluated historic landscape character units, not the<br />
elements/parcels/components that contribute towards the character (paragraph 10.2.28).<br />
There may be effects on the setting of identified units, especially with regard to designated<br />
March 2013 10-9 ES Chapter 10<br />
Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©