Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm largely to avoid direct physical effects on known archaeological sites and to minimise effects on the settings of designated assets. 10.1.7 The chapter is structured as follows: • Methodology; • Baseline Information; • Topic Specific Design Evolution; • Potential Significant Effects of the Scheme; • Mitigation and Enhancement Measures; • Assessment of Residual Effects; and • Cumulative Effects. 10.2 Methodology 10.2.1 This section includes the following topics: • Consultation; • Baseline survey methodology (desk-based assessment, walk-over); • Assessment methodology (criteria used to assess levels of direct and indirect, visual effects). Consultation 10.2.2 Initial consultation has been carried out with West of Scotland Archaeology Service in the form of an exchange of emails. An email from WoSAS dated 14th June 2012 noted that “the ES should include a fairly high number of wireframes and photomontages, illustrating the effect of the proposal on the setting of the scheduled sites surrounded by the windfarm. I would consider that both types of illustration should be included, as photomontages can illustrate the effect of the turbines if fringes of forestry are retained, while wireframes can provide an indication of their visibility if the landscape were cleared of intervening vegetation. In relation to scheduled sites, I would also note the presence of the scheduled Five Sisters shale bing and a scheduled cairn at Harperrig, just outside the 5km buffer. Given that a number of other wind farms have been proposed in areas adjacent to this, any assessment of its effect on the setting of more distant sites should also consider the issue of cumulative impact.” 10.2.3 A scoping report has been issued outlining the methodology to be used. The comments received from that process are detailed in Chapter 2 and have been taken account of within this assessment. 10.2.4 Extensive consultation has also been undertaken with Historic Scotland with respect to designated assets. This is more fully described at paragraph 10.4.1 et seq, below. Baseline Survey Methodology Study Area 10.2.5 Four main study areas have been defined for the purposes of gathering baseline data and completion of the assessment for the proposed wind farm. These are discussed below. March 2013 10-2 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm Application Area 10.2.6 The application area is formed by the site boundary of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.1). Core Study Area 10.2.7 The Core Study Area is formed by a radius of 1.5 km around the boundary of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.1). Figure 10.4 shows historic landscape character areas within the core study area. Inner Study Area 10.2.8 The Inner Study Area is formed by a radius of between 1.5 and 5 km around the boundary of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.2). For buried archaeological sites that are recorded on the WoSAS Historic Environment Record (HER) but not otherwise designated and for those designated historic environment resources of regional and local significance, the study area is a circle of 5 km radius centred on the proposed wind farm. A small area within this radius to the south-east of the proposed wind farm is located within the Scottish Borders Council Area. It is not considered that the potential for likely significant environmental effects on a cultural heritage asset of regional or local importance would exist beyond 3 km and on this basis, and on the basis of a review of Pastmap, data for this area has not been requested. Only those receptors that fall within the ZTV for the proposed wind farm have been identified and described. Outer Study Area 10.2.9 The Outer Study Area is formed by a radius of between 5 and 10 km around the boundary of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.3). Having regard to the nature and scale of the proposed wind farm, and experience of similar developments, it is considered that the potential for likely significant adverse effects on designated cultural heritage assets of international and national significance would be confined to resources within 10 km of the proposed wind farm. A review of internationally significant assets outside this area has been undertaken, however. Desk Assessment 10.2.10 The desk assessment determined how likely it is that any archaeological/cultural heritage feature may occur at the site, what it is and its historical importance/relevance to the area. 10.2.11 The assessment was based on a preliminary, desk-based, assessment of the likelihood of the proposed wind farm site to contain archaeological remains and to provide an indication of what, if any, further work would be required with regard to archaeology. 10.2.12 The primary information resource was a review of the Historic Environment Record. This was supplemented by relevant published documentary and cartographic material, as appropriate, including an examination of early cartographic sources and relevant Ordnance Survey editions, undertaken to identify potential cultural heritage features within and outwith the application area. Geological maps of the study area were also consulted. 10.2.13 Information on World Heritage Sites (WHS), Scheduled Monuments (SMs), listed buildings, Inventoried Gardens and Designed Landscapes (GDL) and Inventoried Historic Battlefields was obtained from Historic Scotland. March 2013 10-3 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 212 and 213: Camilty Wind Farm The B7008 Travell
- Page 214 and 215: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn (nort
- Page 216 and 217: Camilty Wind Farm are then generall
- Page 218 and 219: Camilty Wind Farm Residential Prope
- Page 220 and 221: Camilty Wind Farm to a small magnit
- Page 222 and 223: Camilty Wind Farm the form of light
- Page 224 and 225: Camilty Wind Farm Landscape Charact
- Page 226 and 227: Camilty Wind Farm these Lowland Pla
- Page 228 and 229: Camilty Wind Farm from negligible t
- Page 230 and 231: Camilty Wind Farm visible above int
- Page 232 and 233: Camilty Wind Farm slightly diminish
- Page 234 and 235: Camilty Wind Farm forestry. The pro
- Page 236 and 237: Camilty Wind Farm 9.5.118 At night
- Page 238 and 239: Camilty Wind Farm hills, although t
- Page 240 and 241: Camilty Wind Farm gained. The propo
- Page 242 and 243: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 244 and 245: Camilty Wind Farm Analysis of the L
- Page 246 and 247: Camilty Wind Farm have an effect on
- Page 248 and 249: Camilty Wind Farm the additional cu
- Page 250 and 251: Camilty Wind Farm associated with p
- Page 252 and 253: Camilty Wind Farm Plantation, would
- Page 254 and 255: Camilty Wind Farm to the south west
- Page 256 and 257: Camilty Wind Farm Moderate addition
- Page 258 and 259: Camilty Wind Farm Glasgow. A smalle
- Page 260 and 261: Camilty Wind Farm • Topic Paper 9
- Page 264 and 265: Camilty Wind Farm 10.2.14 An assess
- Page 266 and 267: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.2 Guide
- Page 268 and 269: Camilty Wind Farm Asset Importance
- Page 270 and 271: Camilty Wind Farm historic landscap
- Page 272 and 273: Camilty Wind Farm • Stage Two: de
- Page 274 and 275: Camilty Wind Farm Baseline Conditio
- Page 276 and 277: Camilty Wind Farm 10.4.2 The most s
- Page 278 and 279: Camilty Wind Farm of effect of the
- Page 280 and 281: Camilty Wind Farm Other SMs 10.5.28
- Page 282 and 283: Camilty Wind Farm is of high import
- Page 284 and 285: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.57 The liste
- Page 286 and 287: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.74 Some 5 km
- Page 288 and 289: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.90 The house
- Page 290 and 291: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.106 HB numbe
- Page 292 and 293: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.5 Summar
- Page 294 and 295: Camilty Wind Farm included in Appen
- Page 296 and 297: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.6 Summar
- Page 298 and 299: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 300 and 301: Camilty Wind Farm 11 Terrestrial Ec
- Page 302 and 303: Camilty Wind Farm 11.2 Methodology
- Page 304 and 305: Camilty Wind Farm Consultee Date of
- Page 306 and 307: Camilty Wind Farm Bat Species 11.2.
- Page 308 and 309: Camilty Wind Farm Index (HSI) devel
- Page 310 and 311: Camilty Wind Farm Conservation Sens
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
largely to avoid direct physical effects on known archaeological sites and to minimise effects<br />
on the settings of designated assets.<br />
10.1.7 The chapter is structured as follows:<br />
• Methodology;<br />
• Baseline In<strong>for</strong>mation;<br />
• Topic Specific Design Evolution;<br />
• Potential Significant Effects of the Scheme;<br />
• Mitigation and Enhancement Measures;<br />
• Assessment of Residual Effects; and<br />
• Cumulative Effects.<br />
10.2 Methodology<br />
10.2.1 This section includes the following topics:<br />
• Consultation;<br />
• Baseline survey methodology (desk-based assessment, walk-over);<br />
• Assessment methodology (criteria used to assess levels of direct and indirect, visual<br />
effects).<br />
Consultation<br />
10.2.2 Initial consultation has been carried out with West of Scotland Archaeology Service in the<br />
<strong>for</strong>m of an exchange of emails. An email from WoSAS dated 14th June 2012 noted that “the<br />
ES should include a fairly high number of wireframes and photomontages, illustrating the<br />
effect of the proposal on the setting of the scheduled sites surrounded by the windfarm. I<br />
would consider that both types of illustration should be included, as photomontages can<br />
illustrate the effect of the turbines if fringes of <strong>for</strong>estry are retained, while wireframes can<br />
provide an indication of their visibility if the landscape were cleared of intervening vegetation.<br />
In relation to scheduled sites, I would also note the presence of the scheduled Five Sisters<br />
shale bing and a scheduled cairn at Harperrig, just outside the 5km buffer. Given that a<br />
number of other wind farms have been proposed in areas adjacent to this, any assessment of<br />
its effect on the setting of more distant sites should also consider the issue of cumulative<br />
impact.”<br />
10.2.3 A scoping report has been issued outlining the methodology to be used. The comments<br />
received from that process are detailed in Chapter 2 and have been taken account of within<br />
this assessment.<br />
10.2.4 Extensive consultation has also been undertaken with Historic Scotland with respect to<br />
designated assets. This is more fully described at paragraph 10.4.1 et seq, below.<br />
Baseline Survey Methodology<br />
Study Area<br />
10.2.5 Four main study areas have been defined <strong>for</strong> the purposes of gathering baseline data and<br />
completion of the assessment <strong>for</strong> the proposed wind farm. These are discussed below.<br />
March 2013 10-2 ES Chapter 10<br />
Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©