Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm • Topic Paper 9: ‘Climate Change and Natural Forces – the Consequences for Landscape Character’ (The Countryside Agency, 2003) • The Town and Country Planning (National Scenic Areas) (Scotland) Designation Directions 2010 • Environmental Resources Management (2002) (Review of the role of the National Scenic Area and other landscape designations in the Scottish planning system, SNH Review No 134) • Edinburgh and Lothians Structure Plan 2015 (Approved June 2004) • Glasgow and Clyde Valley Joint Structure Plan (2006) • Scottish Borders Council Structure Plan (Approved September 2002) • Fife Council Structure Plan (Approved 2002) • Falkirk Council Structure Plan (2002) • Stirling Council Supplementary Planning Guidance: Interim Locational Policy and Guidance for Renewable Energy Development (Wind Turbines) • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Lothians Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 91 • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), Clackmannanshire Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 96 • ASH Consulting Group, (1999), Central Region Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 123 • David Tyldesley and Associates, (1999), Stirling to Grangemouth Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 124 • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Borders landscape assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 112 • David Tyldesley and Associates, (1995), Dunfermline District Landscape Assessment: a landscape assessment of Dunfermline District, including part of Kirkcaldy District lying in the West Fife Woodlands Initiative Area, Natural Heritage Review No 19 • Ironside Farrar, (Nov 2010), South Lanarkshire Landscape Character Assessment • Land Use Consultants, (1999), Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 116 March 2013 9-95 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology 10.1 Introduction and Overview 10.1.1 This chapter considers the direct and indirect effects of the proposed wind farm on the cultural heritage of the area, including buried archaeological sites, historic buildings and historic landscapes. It aims to identify all effects on these 'historic assets' - in terms of the potential for direct physical disturbance and indirect visual effects on setting - and to assess the overall effect and significance of these predicted effects. 10.1.2 The following stages of the proposed wind farm are likely to affect the historic environment: • Construction - this would be the phase where direct physical effects on any buried archaeology are most likely to occur; • Operation - this is the phase during which visual effects on the settings of surrounding historic assets would occur; • Decommissioning - this is the phase during which the components of the wind farm would be removed. 10.1.3 The construction of the tracks, turbine foundations, crane pads, construction compounds etc. all involve significant groundworks and have the potential to disturb buried archaeological remains. 10.1.4 A thorough desk assessment of the area of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.1), followed by a site walkover in May 2012, forms the basis for the assessment of the potential for known and unknown remains on the site to be physically disturbed by the proposed wind farm. This information was fed into the design process and the final proposals have, to the greatest extent possible, avoided direct effects on known archaeological sites. 10.1.5 The proposed wind farm consists of six variable pitch (three bladed) wind turbines, each with a maximum tip height of 132 m. Other components of the wind farm development include: • Crane hard-standing areas adjacent to each wind turbine; • Underground electrical and scada 1 substation building; cabling – linking each wind turbine with the • A substation building; • Site access from the existing A70; • Permanent access tracks onto the site and between turbines; • One permanent anemometry mast; and • Temporary construction compound for materials storage and welfare facilities. 10.1.6 Mitigating the potential effects of the proposed development has largely been addressed through the design evolution process. In particular, by carrying out a full and detailed assessment of the location of historic assets within the core study area it has been possible 1 Wind Turbine ‘System Control and Data Acquisition’. March 2013 10-1 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 210 and 211: Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.118 Lights at
- Page 212 and 213: Camilty Wind Farm The B7008 Travell
- Page 214 and 215: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn (nort
- Page 216 and 217: Camilty Wind Farm are then generall
- Page 218 and 219: Camilty Wind Farm Residential Prope
- Page 220 and 221: Camilty Wind Farm to a small magnit
- Page 222 and 223: Camilty Wind Farm the form of light
- Page 224 and 225: Camilty Wind Farm Landscape Charact
- Page 226 and 227: Camilty Wind Farm these Lowland Pla
- Page 228 and 229: Camilty Wind Farm from negligible t
- Page 230 and 231: Camilty Wind Farm visible above int
- Page 232 and 233: Camilty Wind Farm slightly diminish
- Page 234 and 235: Camilty Wind Farm forestry. The pro
- Page 236 and 237: Camilty Wind Farm 9.5.118 At night
- Page 238 and 239: Camilty Wind Farm hills, although t
- Page 240 and 241: Camilty Wind Farm gained. The propo
- Page 242 and 243: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 244 and 245: Camilty Wind Farm Analysis of the L
- Page 246 and 247: Camilty Wind Farm have an effect on
- Page 248 and 249: Camilty Wind Farm the additional cu
- Page 250 and 251: Camilty Wind Farm associated with p
- Page 252 and 253: Camilty Wind Farm Plantation, would
- Page 254 and 255: Camilty Wind Farm to the south west
- Page 256 and 257: Camilty Wind Farm Moderate addition
- Page 258 and 259: Camilty Wind Farm Glasgow. A smalle
- Page 262 and 263: Camilty Wind Farm largely to avoid
- Page 264 and 265: Camilty Wind Farm 10.2.14 An assess
- Page 266 and 267: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.2 Guide
- Page 268 and 269: Camilty Wind Farm Asset Importance
- Page 270 and 271: Camilty Wind Farm historic landscap
- Page 272 and 273: Camilty Wind Farm • Stage Two: de
- Page 274 and 275: Camilty Wind Farm Baseline Conditio
- Page 276 and 277: Camilty Wind Farm 10.4.2 The most s
- Page 278 and 279: Camilty Wind Farm of effect of the
- Page 280 and 281: Camilty Wind Farm Other SMs 10.5.28
- Page 282 and 283: Camilty Wind Farm is of high import
- Page 284 and 285: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.57 The liste
- Page 286 and 287: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.74 Some 5 km
- Page 288 and 289: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.90 The house
- Page 290 and 291: Camilty Wind Farm 10.5.106 HB numbe
- Page 292 and 293: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.5 Summar
- Page 294 and 295: Camilty Wind Farm included in Appen
- Page 296 and 297: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.6 Summar
- Page 298 and 299: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 300 and 301: Camilty Wind Farm 11 Terrestrial Ec
- Page 302 and 303: Camilty Wind Farm 11.2 Methodology
- Page 304 and 305: Camilty Wind Farm Consultee Date of
- Page 306 and 307: Camilty Wind Farm Bat Species 11.2.
- Page 308 and 309: Camilty Wind Farm Index (HSI) devel
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />
10.1 Introduction and Overview<br />
10.1.1 This chapter considers the direct and indirect effects of the proposed wind farm on the<br />
cultural heritage of the area, including buried archaeological sites, historic buildings and<br />
historic landscapes. It aims to identify all effects on these 'historic assets' - in terms of the<br />
potential <strong>for</strong> direct physical disturbance and indirect visual effects on setting - and to assess<br />
the overall effect and significance of these predicted effects.<br />
10.1.2 The following stages of the proposed wind farm are likely to affect the historic environment:<br />
• Construction - this would be the phase where direct physical effects on any buried<br />
archaeology are most likely to occur;<br />
• Operation - this is the phase during which visual effects on the settings of surrounding<br />
historic assets would occur;<br />
• Decommissioning - this is the phase during which the components of the wind farm<br />
would be removed.<br />
10.1.3 The construction of the tracks, turbine foundations, crane pads, construction compounds etc.<br />
all involve significant groundworks and have the potential to disturb buried archaeological<br />
remains.<br />
10.1.4 A thorough desk assessment of the area of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.1),<br />
followed by a site walkover in May 2012, <strong>for</strong>ms the basis <strong>for</strong> the assessment of the potential<br />
<strong>for</strong> known and unknown remains on the site to be physically disturbed by the proposed wind<br />
farm. This in<strong>for</strong>mation was fed into the design process and the final proposals have, to the<br />
greatest extent possible, avoided direct effects on known archaeological sites.<br />
10.1.5 The proposed wind farm consists of six variable pitch (three bladed) wind turbines, each with<br />
a maximum tip height of 132 m. Other components of the wind farm development include:<br />
• Crane hard-standing areas adjacent to each wind turbine;<br />
• Underground electrical and scada 1<br />
substation building;<br />
cabling – linking each wind turbine with the<br />
• A substation building;<br />
• Site access from the existing A70;<br />
• Permanent access tracks onto the site and between turbines;<br />
• One permanent anemometry mast; and<br />
• Temporary construction compound <strong>for</strong> materials storage and welfare facilities.<br />
10.1.6 Mitigating the potential effects of the proposed development has largely been addressed<br />
through the design evolution process. In particular, by carrying out a full and detailed<br />
assessment of the location of historic assets within the core study area it has been possible<br />
1 <strong>Wind</strong> Turbine ‘System Control and Data Acquisition’.<br />
March 2013 10-1 ES Chapter 10<br />
Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©