Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm • Topic Paper 9: ‘Climate Change and Natural Forces – the Consequences for Landscape Character’ (The Countryside Agency, 2003) • The Town and Country Planning (National Scenic Areas) (Scotland) Designation Directions 2010 • Environmental Resources Management (2002) (Review of the role of the National Scenic Area and other landscape designations in the Scottish planning system, SNH Review No 134) • Edinburgh and Lothians Structure Plan 2015 (Approved June 2004) • Glasgow and Clyde Valley Joint Structure Plan (2006) • Scottish Borders Council Structure Plan (Approved September 2002) • Fife Council Structure Plan (Approved 2002) • Falkirk Council Structure Plan (2002) • Stirling Council Supplementary Planning Guidance: Interim Locational Policy and Guidance for Renewable Energy Development (Wind Turbines) • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Lothians Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 91 • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), Clackmannanshire Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 96 • ASH Consulting Group, (1999), Central Region Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 123 • David Tyldesley and Associates, (1999), Stirling to Grangemouth Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 124 • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Borders landscape assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 112 • David Tyldesley and Associates, (1995), Dunfermline District Landscape Assessment: a landscape assessment of Dunfermline District, including part of Kirkcaldy District lying in the West Fife Woodlands Initiative Area, Natural Heritage Review No 19 • Ironside Farrar, (Nov 2010), South Lanarkshire Landscape Character Assessment • Land Use Consultants, (1999), Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 116 March 2013 9-95 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Camilty Wind Farm 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology 10.1 Introduction and Overview 10.1.1 This chapter considers the direct and indirect effects of the proposed wind farm on the cultural heritage of the area, including buried archaeological sites, historic buildings and historic landscapes. It aims to identify all effects on these 'historic assets' - in terms of the potential for direct physical disturbance and indirect visual effects on setting - and to assess the overall effect and significance of these predicted effects. 10.1.2 The following stages of the proposed wind farm are likely to affect the historic environment: • Construction - this would be the phase where direct physical effects on any buried archaeology are most likely to occur; • Operation - this is the phase during which visual effects on the settings of surrounding historic assets would occur; • Decommissioning - this is the phase during which the components of the wind farm would be removed. 10.1.3 The construction of the tracks, turbine foundations, crane pads, construction compounds etc. all involve significant groundworks and have the potential to disturb buried archaeological remains. 10.1.4 A thorough desk assessment of the area of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.1), followed by a site walkover in May 2012, forms the basis for the assessment of the potential for known and unknown remains on the site to be physically disturbed by the proposed wind farm. This information was fed into the design process and the final proposals have, to the greatest extent possible, avoided direct effects on known archaeological sites. 10.1.5 The proposed wind farm consists of six variable pitch (three bladed) wind turbines, each with a maximum tip height of 132 m. Other components of the wind farm development include: • Crane hard-standing areas adjacent to each wind turbine; • Underground electrical and scada 1 substation building; cabling – linking each wind turbine with the • A substation building; • Site access from the existing A70; • Permanent access tracks onto the site and between turbines; • One permanent anemometry mast; and • Temporary construction compound for materials storage and welfare facilities. 10.1.6 Mitigating the potential effects of the proposed development has largely been addressed through the design evolution process. In particular, by carrying out a full and detailed assessment of the location of historic assets within the core study area it has been possible 1 Wind Turbine ‘System Control and Data Acquisition’. March 2013 10-1 ES Chapter 10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

10 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />

10.1 Introduction and Overview<br />

10.1.1 This chapter considers the direct and indirect effects of the proposed wind farm on the<br />

cultural heritage of the area, including buried archaeological sites, historic buildings and<br />

historic landscapes. It aims to identify all effects on these 'historic assets' - in terms of the<br />

potential <strong>for</strong> direct physical disturbance and indirect visual effects on setting - and to assess<br />

the overall effect and significance of these predicted effects.<br />

10.1.2 The following stages of the proposed wind farm are likely to affect the historic environment:<br />

• Construction - this would be the phase where direct physical effects on any buried<br />

archaeology are most likely to occur;<br />

• Operation - this is the phase during which visual effects on the settings of surrounding<br />

historic assets would occur;<br />

• Decommissioning - this is the phase during which the components of the wind farm<br />

would be removed.<br />

10.1.3 The construction of the tracks, turbine foundations, crane pads, construction compounds etc.<br />

all involve significant groundworks and have the potential to disturb buried archaeological<br />

remains.<br />

10.1.4 A thorough desk assessment of the area of the proposed wind farm (see Figure 10.1),<br />

followed by a site walkover in May 2012, <strong>for</strong>ms the basis <strong>for</strong> the assessment of the potential<br />

<strong>for</strong> known and unknown remains on the site to be physically disturbed by the proposed wind<br />

farm. This in<strong>for</strong>mation was fed into the design process and the final proposals have, to the<br />

greatest extent possible, avoided direct effects on known archaeological sites.<br />

10.1.5 The proposed wind farm consists of six variable pitch (three bladed) wind turbines, each with<br />

a maximum tip height of 132 m. Other components of the wind farm development include:<br />

• Crane hard-standing areas adjacent to each wind turbine;<br />

• Underground electrical and scada 1<br />

substation building;<br />

cabling – linking each wind turbine with the<br />

• A substation building;<br />

• Site access from the existing A70;<br />

• Permanent access tracks onto the site and between turbines;<br />

• One permanent anemometry mast; and<br />

• Temporary construction compound <strong>for</strong> materials storage and welfare facilities.<br />

10.1.6 Mitigating the potential effects of the proposed development has largely been addressed<br />

through the design evolution process. In particular, by carrying out a full and detailed<br />

assessment of the location of historic assets within the core study area it has been possible<br />

1 <strong>Wind</strong> Turbine ‘System Control and Data Acquisition’.<br />

March 2013 10-1 ES Chapter 10<br />

Cultural Heritage and Archaeology<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!