07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Consultee Response Where and How Addressed<br />

The council is satisfied with the methodology and<br />

assumptions made in the ES.<br />

West Lothian<br />

Council Flood<br />

Prevention<br />

Officer (17<br />

August 2012)<br />

In terms of cumulative assessment, the council is<br />

satisfied that the projects identified are acceptable<br />

at this time. Pearie Law noted as being in<br />

planning rather than in scoping.<br />

EIA must have sufficient in<strong>for</strong>mation to assess<br />

whether the proposal is likely to have a significant<br />

affect on the qualifying interests of any Natura<br />

2000 sites.<br />

The depth of the peat across the site must be<br />

identified in addition to distribution.<br />

Requests that additional viewpoints are added<br />

and that some that have been included are<br />

omitted. It is there<strong>for</strong>e suggested that the 25<br />

viewpoints used in the EIA <strong>for</strong> the Harburnhead<br />

<strong>Wind</strong>farm section 36 application are used, due to<br />

the proximity of the site.<br />

A methodology <strong>for</strong> noise assessment has been<br />

agreed with the Council’s Noise specialist.<br />

Further detail required on the proposed<br />

watercourse crossings<br />

Type of crossing and estimated clearance should<br />

be provided.<br />

Drainage Impact Assessment (DIA)<br />

Should be submitted with application to detail<br />

measures proposed to deal with quantity and<br />

quality of surface and ground water, pre and postdevelopment<br />

(storm event) and include impact of<br />

construction on rural housing in site boundary.<br />

Evaluation of the existing drainage system should<br />

be carried out to assess its current condition and<br />

level of operation.<br />

The report has deemed that a flood risk<br />

assessment is not likely to be required<br />

The proposal should evaluate the effect of<br />

construction on the surrounding watercourses and<br />

assess whether they have the capacity to deal<br />

with additional runoff. The level of tree felling<br />

within the proposed site will contribute to this<br />

additional runoff and will there<strong>for</strong>e have to be<br />

included in the evaluation. Saturation excess will<br />

have to be accounted <strong>for</strong> as the surrounding area<br />

consists of wet, marshy grasslands.<br />

Details of long-term management risks<br />

Clarify the level of maintenance <strong>for</strong> the<br />

watercourses, water crossings and drainage<br />

system planned <strong>for</strong> the development. The<br />

Noted<br />

This is provided in Chapters 11<br />

(Terrestrial Ecology) and 12<br />

(Ornithology)<br />

This is considered in Chapter 13<br />

(Hydrology, Hydrogeology and<br />

Ground conditions)<br />

Viewpoint selection is<br />

considered in Chapter 9<br />

(Landscape and Visual), and<br />

follows discussion with West<br />

Lothian Council and SNH who<br />

requested different viewpoints.<br />

This is discussed in Chapter 8<br />

(Noise)<br />

Provided in the watercourse<br />

crossing survey in Appendix<br />

13.3<br />

This is assessed in Chapter 13<br />

(Hydrology, Hydrogeology and<br />

Ground Conditions) (section<br />

13.8)<br />

This is considered in Chapter 13<br />

(Section 13.8)<br />

This is considered in Chapter 13<br />

(Section 13.8)<br />

March 2013 2-5 ES Chapter 2<br />

The EIA and Scoping Process<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!