Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm visible above intervening trees and heavily filtered through bare trees in winter from the upper floors of the south east facing windows of Harburn House. 9.5.80 At night, warning lights on turbines would be largely obscured by trees within the estate. Some filtered views of lights may be visible in water, when deciduous trees are not in leaf, against a dark, unlit landscape. Effects on receptors would be Slight, which is not significant. Viewpoint 2. A70 North East of the Site 9.5.81 The proposed wind farm would form a prominent addition to this mid-distance view across rough grazing land and moorland. The turbines and anemometry mast would be clearly visible rising out of cleared areas within the commercial plantation in the middle distance. Access tracks and low level infrastructure are likely to be screened by vegetation retained within the site. The corridor of the A70 would remain prominent in the foreground of the view. The new development would be visible in the context of the existing wind farm at Pates Hill in a similar landscape context, to the right of the view. The sensitivity of occupiers of vehicles travelling towards the site would be medium. The magnitude of change on the transient views would be medium, resulting in a Moderate effect, which is not significant. 9.5.82 This assessment of effects is based on a single point on the A70. Occupiers of vehicles would generally experience a sequence of transient views within a journey. Sequential effects as assessed at paragraphs 9.5.133 to 9.5.146 9.5.83 The aviation warning lights at the proposed development would be visible in the context of the lights at Pates Hill and traffic on the A70, in a relatively dark rural context. The effect on views at night would be Slight. Viewpoint 3. A70 South West of Site 9.5.84 Views from this point on the A70 represent the first open views of the proposed wind farm when travelling north east. The proposed wind farm would form a prominent addition to the view directly ahead on the same alignment as the road. The gently dipping landform in the middle distance and the mature conifers within the plantation would partially conceal the bases of the turbines. The turbines and anemometry mast would be seen against the open skyline as large scale features and a new focus in the view. Low level infrastructure at the site in felled areas of forestry would be either concealed or barely perceptible in the view. Occupiers of vehicles on this road would be of medium sensitivity to a medium magnitude of change. The effect on transient views would be Moderate, which is not significant. 9.5.85 This assessment of effects is based on a single point on the A70. Occupiers of vehicles would generally experience a sequence of transient views within a journey. Sequential effects as assessed at paragraphs 9.5.133 to 9.5.146. 9.5.86 The aviation warning lights at the proposed development would be visible in the context of traffic on the A70, in an otherwise dark rural context. The effect on views at night would be Slight. Viewpoint 4. Crosswood Reservoir 9.5.87 This near view would contain a new focus following the development of the proposed wind farm. All six turbines and the anemometry mast would be clearly visible as prominent new elements of development against the skyline, rising out of mature conifer plantation and recently felled/replanted areas of plantation. The turbines would be well spaced within the view, avoiding obstruction and allowing views through to the landscape beyond on the right March 2013 9-65 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm hand side of the wind farm. The blocks and strips of woodland which would need to be felled to accommodate the turbines and access tracks would be barely perceptible in this view due to the extensive area of retained forestry. Access tracks to turbines 2 and 3 would be visible as a very minor addition to the infrastructure of Camilty Plantation. The sensitivity of walkers at this location is high and the magnitude of change in view they would experience would be large. The nature of the permanent operational change would result in a Substantial effect, which is significant in terms of the assessment methodology. 9.5.88 Warning lights on turbines would be visible against a dark sky above vehicles lights using the A70 and B7008, all of which would be prominent in a dark landscape. Lights within settlements in the Lowland Plateaux and Plains beyond may provide some distant night time context for the proposals. Effects on receptors would be Moderate. Viewpoint 5. Tarbrax 9.5.89 In this open view from the edge of the settlement all six turbines would be partially visible above the shallow plateau of moorland and the intermittent clumps of trees on the horizon. The ridge of the Pentland Hills is sufficiently distant to the right of the view for the proposed wind farm to avoid any interference with views of the landmark feature. The turbines and anemometry mast would appear to sit in a moorland landscape beyond forestry at the fringe of the Regional Park. The wind farm would encroach into this view as a new type of development. However, the overall rural character would be maintained. Occupiers of residential properties within the village would be receptors of high sensitivity who would experience long term effects which would be small in magnitude. The change in view would result in a Moderate effect which is not significant. 9.5.90 Lighting on the hubs of some of the turbines would be visible on the horizon. Vehicle lights on the A70 may be intermittently visible through trees to the right of the view, providing a partially lit context in an essentially dark rural landscape. Effects on receptors at night would be Slight, which is not significant. Viewpoint 6. Woolfords Cottages 9.5.91 The proposed wind farm would be partially visible in the distance above intervening vegetation at the railway line. Blocks and belts of mature conifers either side of the view would obscure two of the turbines and the anemometry mast. The proposed wind farm would be visible against the backdrop of the Pentland Hills. It would form a minor although recognisable addition to the view which would not change the overall character of the view, which would still be largely rural. Residents at Woolfords Cottages are receptors of high sensitivity and would experience a small magnitude of change. The effect on receptors would be Moderate, which is not significant. 9.5.92 The warning lights on the turbines would be barely discernible above the intervening trees, forming a very limited change in the view. The effect on receptors at night would be Slight, which is not significant. Viewpoint 7. Cobbinshaw Reservoir 9.5.93 The proposed wind farm would be visible as a prominent addition to this open view across the reservoir. The turbines and the anemometry mast would form a new focus within the backdrop to the view, potentially visible reflected in the water’s surface. The six turbines would be visible immediately to the left of the Pentland Hills ridge and although not overlapping, or directly interfering within the view to them, the proposed wind farm would March 2013 9-66 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 180 and 181: Camilty Wind Farm Significance of E
- Page 182 and 183: Camilty Wind Farm character. Where
- Page 184 and 185: Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.10 Although t
- Page 186 and 187: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn House
- Page 188 and 189: Camilty Wind Farm Local plans shoul
- Page 190 and 191: Camilty Wind Farm • Pateshill •
- Page 192 and 193: Camilty Wind Farm settings; however
- Page 194 and 195: Camilty Wind Farm • Urban 9.3.54
- Page 196 and 197: Camilty Wind Farm LCT/LCA Broughton
- Page 198 and 199: Camilty Wind Farm LCT/LCA Landscape
- Page 200 and 201: Camilty Wind Farm Hills lies to the
- Page 202 and 203: Camilty Wind Farm these routes are
- Page 204 and 205: Camilty Wind Farm centre and left h
- Page 206 and 207: Camilty Wind Farm towards the Firth
- Page 208 and 209: Camilty Wind Farm Viewpoint 20. For
- Page 210 and 211: Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.118 Lights at
- Page 212 and 213: Camilty Wind Farm The B7008 Travell
- Page 214 and 215: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn (nort
- Page 216 and 217: Camilty Wind Farm are then generall
- Page 218 and 219: Camilty Wind Farm Residential Prope
- Page 220 and 221: Camilty Wind Farm to a small magnit
- Page 222 and 223: Camilty Wind Farm the form of light
- Page 224 and 225: Camilty Wind Farm Landscape Charact
- Page 226 and 227: Camilty Wind Farm these Lowland Pla
- Page 228 and 229: Camilty Wind Farm from negligible t
- Page 232 and 233: Camilty Wind Farm slightly diminish
- Page 234 and 235: Camilty Wind Farm forestry. The pro
- Page 236 and 237: Camilty Wind Farm 9.5.118 At night
- Page 238 and 239: Camilty Wind Farm hills, although t
- Page 240 and 241: Camilty Wind Farm gained. The propo
- Page 242 and 243: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 244 and 245: Camilty Wind Farm Analysis of the L
- Page 246 and 247: Camilty Wind Farm have an effect on
- Page 248 and 249: Camilty Wind Farm the additional cu
- Page 250 and 251: Camilty Wind Farm associated with p
- Page 252 and 253: Camilty Wind Farm Plantation, would
- Page 254 and 255: Camilty Wind Farm to the south west
- Page 256 and 257: Camilty Wind Farm Moderate addition
- Page 258 and 259: Camilty Wind Farm Glasgow. A smalle
- Page 260 and 261: Camilty Wind Farm • Topic Paper 9
- Page 262 and 263: Camilty Wind Farm largely to avoid
- Page 264 and 265: Camilty Wind Farm 10.2.14 An assess
- Page 266 and 267: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.2 Guide
- Page 268 and 269: Camilty Wind Farm Asset Importance
- Page 270 and 271: Camilty Wind Farm historic landscap
- Page 272 and 273: Camilty Wind Farm • Stage Two: de
- Page 274 and 275: Camilty Wind Farm Baseline Conditio
- Page 276 and 277: Camilty Wind Farm 10.4.2 The most s
- Page 278 and 279: Camilty Wind Farm of effect of the
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
hand side of the wind farm. The blocks and strips of woodland which would need to be felled<br />
to accommodate the turbines and access tracks would be barely perceptible in this view due<br />
to the extensive area of retained <strong>for</strong>estry. Access tracks to turbines 2 and 3 would be visible<br />
as a very minor addition to the infrastructure of <strong>Camilty</strong> Plantation. The sensitivity of walkers<br />
at this location is high and the magnitude of change in view they would experience would be<br />
large. The nature of the permanent operational change would result in a Substantial effect,<br />
which is significant in terms of the assessment methodology.<br />
9.5.88 Warning lights on turbines would be visible against a dark sky above vehicles lights using the<br />
A70 and B7008, all of which would be prominent in a dark landscape. Lights within<br />
settlements in the Lowland Plateaux and Plains beyond may provide some distant night time<br />
context <strong>for</strong> the proposals. Effects on receptors would be Moderate.<br />
Viewpoint 5. Tarbrax<br />
9.5.89 In this open view from the edge of the settlement all six turbines would be partially visible<br />
above the shallow plateau of moorland and the intermittent clumps of trees on the horizon.<br />
The ridge of the Pentland Hills is sufficiently distant to the right of the view <strong>for</strong> the proposed<br />
wind farm to avoid any interference with views of the landmark feature. The turbines and<br />
anemometry mast would appear to sit in a moorland landscape beyond <strong>for</strong>estry at the fringe<br />
of the Regional Park. The wind farm would encroach into this view as a new type of<br />
development. However, the overall rural character would be maintained. Occupiers of<br />
residential properties within the village would be receptors of high sensitivity who would<br />
experience long term effects which would be small in magnitude. The change in view would<br />
result in a Moderate effect which is not significant.<br />
9.5.90 Lighting on the hubs of some of the turbines would be visible on the horizon. Vehicle lights on<br />
the A70 may be intermittently visible through trees to the right of the view, providing a<br />
partially lit context in an essentially dark rural landscape. Effects on receptors at night would<br />
be Slight, which is not significant.<br />
Viewpoint 6. Wool<strong>for</strong>ds Cottages<br />
9.5.91 The proposed wind farm would be partially visible in the distance above intervening<br />
vegetation at the railway line. Blocks and belts of mature conifers either side of the view<br />
would obscure two of the turbines and the anemometry mast. The proposed wind farm would<br />
be visible against the backdrop of the Pentland Hills. It would <strong>for</strong>m a minor although<br />
recognisable addition to the view which would not change the overall character of the view,<br />
which would still be largely rural. Residents at Wool<strong>for</strong>ds Cottages are receptors of high<br />
sensitivity and would experience a small magnitude of change. The effect on receptors would<br />
be Moderate, which is not significant.<br />
9.5.92 The warning lights on the turbines would be barely discernible above the intervening trees,<br />
<strong>for</strong>ming a very limited change in the view. The effect on receptors at night would be Slight,<br />
which is not significant.<br />
Viewpoint 7. Cobbinshaw Reservoir<br />
9.5.93 The proposed wind farm would be visible as a prominent addition to this open view across<br />
the reservoir. The turbines and the anemometry mast would <strong>for</strong>m a new focus within the<br />
backdrop to the view, potentially visible reflected in the water’s surface. The six turbines<br />
would be visible immediately to the left of the Pentland Hills ridge and although not<br />
overlapping, or directly interfering within the view to them, the proposed wind farm would<br />
March 2013 9-66 ES Chapter 9<br />
Landscape and Visual<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©