Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm the form of lighting is still to be agreed, visible lighting has been assumed for the purposes of this assessment, to present a worst case scenario. However, if infrared lighting is adopted, which is not visible to the human eye at distances of more than 500 m, the proposals would not result in any effects on visual receptors or landscape character. 9.5.33 The appearance of the turbines will vary according to wind direction, meteorological conditions and distance. The paragraphs below have taken into account the effects of these variables on the views available to visual receptors, although the photomontages all show turbines facing the viewer and blade tips rotated to show above intervening vegetation and landform as the worse case scenario. Effects on Landscape Resources During the Operation of the Wind Farm Methodology 9.5.34 The detailed methodology used in assessing the significance of effects is as set out in section 2, and is the same as that used in assessing the construction effects. The value of the landscape resource (based on designations) and its sensitivity to the proposed development is considered in relation to the magnitude of the proposed change. The importance of the change to the landscape resource can then be assessed. Unlike the temporary nature of the construction phase, the effects of the operational phase are considered (for the purposes of this assessment) to be permanent. Consideration has been given as to whether the proposed wind farm would become the key landscape characteristic: that is, whether the wind farm would establish a ‘wind farm landscape type’ and further away from the site, a ‘wind farm landscape sub-type’; or whether it would be perceived only as a landscape element within another landscape type or sub-type. The effects on the landscape fabric and character during the operation of the wind farm are set out in detail at Appendix 9.7. Effects on Designated Landscapes 9.5.35 Landscape character types which coincide with the landscape designations are illustrated on Figure 9.9. An assessment of effects on their character can be found at Appendix 9.7. Areas of Great Landscape Value 9.5.36 The site is located adjacent to the Pentland Hills AGLV, which extends over an area of uplands to the south east of the site. The alignment of the A70 forms the edge of the designation and forms the south east boundary of the proposal site. The area is designated for it scenic quality and protected at a local level. The proposed wind farm would form a prominent development in the immediate context of the AGLV, and would have an influence over the character of this upland landscape. The proposal would form the closest of a linear group of other wind farms extending away from the AGLV, and sits within a commercial forestry setting. The proposal would result in an indirect effect on a landscape of high sensitivity, leading to a small magnitude of change and a Moderate effect, which is not significant. The Moderate effects are particularly localised within the AGLV, extending to approximately 5 km from the site. The majority of the AGLV, which extends north east towards Edinburgh, is located up to 18 km from the application site and would be significantly less influenced by the proposal. Effects on the character of this part of the AGLV would range from Slight to Negligible. Viewpoints 4, Crosswood reservoir (Figure 9.14/4), 11, Harperrig Reservoir (Figure 9.14/11), 12 West Cairn Hill (Figure 9.14/12), 13 Craigengar (Figure 9.14/13), 17 Black Hill (Figure 9.14/17), 18 Thriepmuir Reservoir (Figure 9.14/18)and 19 March 2013 9-57 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm Allermuir Hill (Figure 9.14/19) have been chosen to identify landscape and visual effects as part of the assessment. 9.5.37 To the north of the site between Livingston and Linlithgow is the Avon Valley and Devon Hills AGLV, which includes the Bathgate Hills. The proposed development would form a distant, although still recognisable, addition to a landscape, approximately 10 km from this designated landscape. The influence over the character of the AGLV would result in a small magnitude of change to a landscape of medium sensitivity. The effects would be Slight, which is not significant. Viewpoint 16, Knock Viewing Point Bathgate Hills, illustrated in Figure 9.14/16, has been chosen to identify landscape and visual effects as part of the assessment. 9.5.38 The AGLV designation covering the large area of Holyrood Park and Arthur’s Seat coincides with the only area of ZTV within the group of eight AGLV’s in Edinburgh. The wind farm would be barely perceptible at this distance and would have very limited influence over the character of the landscape. The sensitivity of the landscape is medium and the magnitude would be negligible, leading to a Negligible effect, which is not significant. Viewpoint 23, Arthur’s Seat, illustrated in Figure 9.14/23, has been chosen to identify landscape and visual effects as part of the assessment. 9.5.39 More distant AGLV’s lie to the north of the Forth of Firth, including the Broomhall/Belleknowes AGLV, which incorporates Charlestown and Limekilns and the Cullaloe Hills/The Binn AGLV. The effects on these designations would all be Negligible, which is not significant. Regional Park 9.5.40 The Pentland Hills Regional Park covers some 10,000 hectares of land forming an important recreational resource that extends up to the A70 on the boundary of the site as a narrow finger of land. The majority of the land within the Pentland Hills to the south east of the site does not lie within the Regional Park, although this is included in the AGLV designation. The proposed wind farm would have an indirect effect on the character and qualities of the park and the areas used as a recreational resource. The scheme would extend the influence of existing wind farms in the landscape up to the park boundary. Areas of the park that are currently intervisible with wind farms at Blacklaw, Pates Hill and Muirhall would also be influenced by the new, closer scheme. The sensitivity of the landscape is high and the magnitude of change would be small, resulting in a Moderate effect, which is not significant. The majority of the park, which extends north to the fringes of Edinburgh, would be less influenced by the proposal. Viewpoints 11, Harperrig Reservoir (Figure 9.14/11), 12 West Cairn Hill (Figure 9.14/12), 17 Black Hill (Figure 9.14/17), 18 Thriepmuir Reservoir (Figure 9.14/18) and 19 Allermuir Hill (Figure 9.14/19) have been chosen to identify landscape and visual effects as part of the assessment. National Scenic Areas 9.5.41 The Upper Tweeddale NSA lies within the study area, approximately 20 km south east of the site. The hill tops and peaks allow far reaching views north beyond the Pentland ridge to the proposal. The turbines would be barely perceptible in the context of this attractive upland landscape. The sensitivity of the landscape is high and the magnitude of change would be negligible, resulting in a Negligible effect, which is not significant. Viewpoint 24 at Pykstone Hill, illustrated in Figure 9.14/24, has been chosen to identify landscape and visual effects as part of the assessment. March 2013 9-58 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 172 and 173: Camilty Wind Farm 9.2.34 The potent
- Page 174 and 175: Camilty Wind Farm viewpoint locatio
- Page 176 and 177: Camilty Wind Farm landscape’ (par
- Page 178 and 179: Camilty Wind Farm Table 9.5 Recepto
- Page 180 and 181: Camilty Wind Farm Significance of E
- Page 182 and 183: Camilty Wind Farm character. Where
- Page 184 and 185: Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.10 Although t
- Page 186 and 187: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn House
- Page 188 and 189: Camilty Wind Farm Local plans shoul
- Page 190 and 191: Camilty Wind Farm • Pateshill •
- Page 192 and 193: Camilty Wind Farm settings; however
- Page 194 and 195: Camilty Wind Farm • Urban 9.3.54
- Page 196 and 197: Camilty Wind Farm LCT/LCA Broughton
- Page 198 and 199: Camilty Wind Farm LCT/LCA Landscape
- Page 200 and 201: Camilty Wind Farm Hills lies to the
- Page 202 and 203: Camilty Wind Farm these routes are
- Page 204 and 205: Camilty Wind Farm centre and left h
- Page 206 and 207: Camilty Wind Farm towards the Firth
- Page 208 and 209: Camilty Wind Farm Viewpoint 20. For
- Page 210 and 211: Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.118 Lights at
- Page 212 and 213: Camilty Wind Farm The B7008 Travell
- Page 214 and 215: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn (nort
- Page 216 and 217: Camilty Wind Farm are then generall
- Page 218 and 219: Camilty Wind Farm Residential Prope
- Page 220 and 221: Camilty Wind Farm to a small magnit
- Page 224 and 225: Camilty Wind Farm Landscape Charact
- Page 226 and 227: Camilty Wind Farm these Lowland Pla
- Page 228 and 229: Camilty Wind Farm from negligible t
- Page 230 and 231: Camilty Wind Farm visible above int
- Page 232 and 233: Camilty Wind Farm slightly diminish
- Page 234 and 235: Camilty Wind Farm forestry. The pro
- Page 236 and 237: Camilty Wind Farm 9.5.118 At night
- Page 238 and 239: Camilty Wind Farm hills, although t
- Page 240 and 241: Camilty Wind Farm gained. The propo
- Page 242 and 243: Camilty Wind Farm Receptor Effect D
- Page 244 and 245: Camilty Wind Farm Analysis of the L
- Page 246 and 247: Camilty Wind Farm have an effect on
- Page 248 and 249: Camilty Wind Farm the additional cu
- Page 250 and 251: Camilty Wind Farm associated with p
- Page 252 and 253: Camilty Wind Farm Plantation, would
- Page 254 and 255: Camilty Wind Farm to the south west
- Page 256 and 257: Camilty Wind Farm Moderate addition
- Page 258 and 259: Camilty Wind Farm Glasgow. A smalle
- Page 260 and 261: Camilty Wind Farm • Topic Paper 9
- Page 262 and 263: Camilty Wind Farm largely to avoid
- Page 264 and 265: Camilty Wind Farm 10.2.14 An assess
- Page 266 and 267: Camilty Wind Farm Table 10.2 Guide
- Page 268 and 269: Camilty Wind Farm Asset Importance
- Page 270 and 271: Camilty Wind Farm historic landscap
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
the <strong>for</strong>m of lighting is still to be agreed, visible lighting has been assumed <strong>for</strong> the purposes of<br />
this assessment, to present a worst case scenario. However, if infrared lighting is adopted,<br />
which is not visible to the human eye at distances of more than 500 m, the proposals would<br />
not result in any effects on visual receptors or landscape character.<br />
9.5.33 The appearance of the turbines will vary according to wind direction, meteorological<br />
conditions and distance. The paragraphs below have taken into account the effects of these<br />
variables on the views available to visual receptors, although the photomontages all show<br />
turbines facing the viewer and blade tips rotated to show above intervening vegetation and<br />
land<strong>for</strong>m as the worse case scenario.<br />
Effects on Landscape Resources During the Operation of the <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
Methodology<br />
9.5.34 The detailed methodology used in assessing the significance of effects is as set out in<br />
section 2, and is the same as that used in assessing the construction effects. The value of<br />
the landscape resource (based on designations) and its sensitivity to the proposed<br />
development is considered in relation to the magnitude of the proposed change. The<br />
importance of the change to the landscape resource can then be assessed. Unlike the<br />
temporary nature of the construction phase, the effects of the operational phase are<br />
considered (<strong>for</strong> the purposes of this assessment) to be permanent. Consideration has been<br />
given as to whether the proposed wind farm would become the key landscape characteristic:<br />
that is, whether the wind farm would establish a ‘wind farm landscape type’ and further away<br />
from the site, a ‘wind farm landscape sub-type’; or whether it would be perceived only as a<br />
landscape element within another landscape type or sub-type. The effects on the landscape<br />
fabric and character during the operation of the wind farm are set out in detail at Appendix<br />
9.7.<br />
Effects on Designated Landscapes<br />
9.5.35 Landscape character types which coincide with the landscape designations are illustrated on<br />
Figure 9.9. An assessment of effects on their character can be found at Appendix 9.7.<br />
Areas of Great Landscape Value<br />
9.5.36 The site is located adjacent to the Pentland Hills AGLV, which extends over an area of<br />
uplands to the south east of the site. The alignment of the A70 <strong>for</strong>ms the edge of the<br />
designation and <strong>for</strong>ms the south east boundary of the proposal site. The area is designated<br />
<strong>for</strong> it scenic quality and protected at a local level. The proposed wind farm would <strong>for</strong>m a<br />
prominent development in the immediate context of the AGLV, and would have an influence<br />
over the character of this upland landscape. The proposal would <strong>for</strong>m the closest of a linear<br />
group of other wind farms extending away from the AGLV, and sits within a commercial<br />
<strong>for</strong>estry setting. The proposal would result in an indirect effect on a landscape of high<br />
sensitivity, leading to a small magnitude of change and a Moderate effect, which is not<br />
significant. The Moderate effects are particularly localised within the AGLV, extending to<br />
approximately 5 km from the site. The majority of the AGLV, which extends north east<br />
towards Edinburgh, is located up to 18 km from the application site and would be significantly<br />
less influenced by the proposal. Effects on the character of this part of the AGLV would range<br />
from Slight to Negligible. Viewpoints 4, Crosswood reservoir (Figure 9.14/4), 11, Harperrig<br />
Reservoir (Figure 9.14/11), 12 West Cairn Hill (Figure 9.14/12), 13 Craigengar (Figure<br />
9.14/13), 17 Black Hill (Figure 9.14/17), 18 Thriepmuir Reservoir (Figure 9.14/18)and 19<br />
March 2013 9-57 ES Chapter 9<br />
Landscape and Visual<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©