Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables
Camilty Wind Farm settings; however, it does lie adjacent to the setting of the Pentland Hills Uplands landmark landscape feature. Step Four 9.3.45 The key ‘gateway’ or tourist routes of high amenity value in West Lothian were identified as part of this step including 14 roads, four footpaths and two cycleways. The most relevant principle sensitive routes identified within the vicinity of the proposal site include two sections of the A70 to the north and south of the site: • A70 ‘Lang Whang’ at the southern West Lothian boundary, with views northwards across Cobbinshaw Reservoir towards the Bathgate Hills; • A70 ‘Lang Whang’ between Harperrig Reservoir and the eastern West Lothian boundary, with views southwards and eastwards to the Pentland Hills. Step Five 9.3.46 This step involved the identification of ‘iconic’ viewpoints. The viewpoints should satisfy two criteria: • ‘the viewpoint should be a major ‘destination’ in its own right, not merely a viewpoint where passers-by may stop to enjoy a view; • the viewpoint should be representative of the West Lothian or Lothian landscape, a ‘post-card’ type view. 9.3.47 Field validation included the identification of visual cones or compartments for each viewpoint. Nine viewpoints were identified including West Cairn Hill ‘representing the highest point within the Pentland Hills in West Lothian and readily accessible from the footpath route through the Cauldstane Slap from a parking area off the A70 at Little Vantage’. The maximum radius of 10km was identified around the viewpoint, within which the proposal site is located. The study states that ‘the distance is considered appropriate within which wind energy development would create significant adverse visual effects and would impair the visual experience having climbed to the summit via the Cauldstane Slap footpath route or other routes from within the Pentland Hills Regional Park’. Step Six 9.3.48 The final step of the assessment brings together all the previous steps to identify areas potentially suitable in landscape and visual terms for wind energy development. The study identifies two areas that are considered to have potential for wind energy developments in landscape unit 2(ii). These are a small extension to the western side of the Pates Hill Wind Farm and an area in the Woodmuir Plantation which is only considered to have potential if the adjacent Tormywheel wind farm is not constructed. Several further potential development areas are shown in the band of settled landscape, which extends across the centre of the West Lothian area. Baseline Conditions Landscape Character 9.3.49 As mentioned in the Methodology section, the landscape character of the study area was assessed as part of a national programme of landscape character assessment, carried out by SNH in partnership with local authorities and other agencies. March 2013 9-27 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.50 In order that the baseline assessment of landscape character is consistent across the study area, and is considered at a level of detail appropriate to the location and scale of the proposed wind farm, a degree of synthesis has been necessary. This process, undertaken by RPS, has been informed by SNH, the local authority and other agencies as well as field study over a number of months. 9.3.51 The 35 km radius study area for the development is covered by the following assessments: • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Lothians Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 91; • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Borders landscape assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 112; • David Tyldesley and Associates, (1995), Dunfermline District Landscape Assessment: a landscape assessment of Dunfermline District, including part of Kirkcaldy District lying in the West Fife Woodlands Initiative Area, Natural Heritage Review No 19; • Ironside Farrar, (Nov 2010), South Lanarkshire Landscape Character Assessment; • Land Use Consultants, (1999), Glasgow and the Clyde Valley landscape assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 116; • ASH Consulting Group, (1998), Clackmannanshire Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 96; • ASH Consulting Group, (1999), Central Region Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 123; and • David Tyldesley and Associates, (1999), Stirling to Grangemouth Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 124. 9.3.52 At a more detailed scale, the differences within each of these character areas become apparent during research of the baseline conditions. The areas have been identified, located and described based on desk study and field observation by RPS. 9.3.53 The SNH Landscape Character Assessments identify 68 generic character types within the 35 km radius area of search. Following a review of the descriptions within the text by RPS, it is considered that some of the character types within different SNH assessments are equivalent. As the site lies within West Lothian, the landscape character types within The Lothians Landscape Character Assessment have been used as the basis for all character types within the eight districts of the study area. These were subsequently correlated using similarities within the character to correspond with a manageable assessment of 8 character types designed by RPS under the following titles: • Upland Fringes • Upland • Lowland Plateaux • Lowland Plains • Lowland Hills • River Valley • Coastal March 2013 9-28 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©
- Page 142 and 143: Camilty Wind Farm Construction on S
- Page 144 and 145: Camilty Wind Farm 8.5.23 These cons
- Page 146 and 147: Camilty Wind Farm 8.5.28 The follow
- Page 148 and 149: Camilty Wind Farm Chart 8.7: Halfwa
- Page 150 and 151: Camilty Wind Farm Chart 8.11: Over
- Page 152 and 153: Camilty Wind Farm Table 8.10 Differ
- Page 154 and 155: Camilty Wind Farm • Deliveries sh
- Page 156 and 157: Camilty Wind Farm 8.8 Cumulative Ef
- Page 158 and 159: Camilty Wind Farm Chart 8.16: Colzi
- Page 160 and 161: Camilty Wind Farm Chart 8.20: Harbu
- Page 162 and 163: Camilty Wind Farm Chart 8.24: Whist
- Page 164 and 165: Camilty Wind Farm 8.8.15 Chart 8.26
- Page 166 and 167: Camilty Wind Farm 9 Landscape and V
- Page 168 and 169: Camilty Wind Farm • The Scottish
- Page 170 and 171: Camilty Wind Farm • Select an app
- Page 172 and 173: Camilty Wind Farm 9.2.34 The potent
- Page 174 and 175: Camilty Wind Farm viewpoint locatio
- Page 176 and 177: Camilty Wind Farm landscape’ (par
- Page 178 and 179: Camilty Wind Farm Table 9.5 Recepto
- Page 180 and 181: Camilty Wind Farm Significance of E
- Page 182 and 183: Camilty Wind Farm character. Where
- Page 184 and 185: Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.10 Although t
- Page 186 and 187: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn House
- Page 188 and 189: Camilty Wind Farm Local plans shoul
- Page 190 and 191: Camilty Wind Farm • Pateshill •
- Page 194 and 195: Camilty Wind Farm • Urban 9.3.54
- Page 196 and 197: Camilty Wind Farm LCT/LCA Broughton
- Page 198 and 199: Camilty Wind Farm LCT/LCA Landscape
- Page 200 and 201: Camilty Wind Farm Hills lies to the
- Page 202 and 203: Camilty Wind Farm these routes are
- Page 204 and 205: Camilty Wind Farm centre and left h
- Page 206 and 207: Camilty Wind Farm towards the Firth
- Page 208 and 209: Camilty Wind Farm Viewpoint 20. For
- Page 210 and 211: Camilty Wind Farm 9.3.118 Lights at
- Page 212 and 213: Camilty Wind Farm The B7008 Travell
- Page 214 and 215: Camilty Wind Farm • Harburn (nort
- Page 216 and 217: Camilty Wind Farm are then generall
- Page 218 and 219: Camilty Wind Farm Residential Prope
- Page 220 and 221: Camilty Wind Farm to a small magnit
- Page 222 and 223: Camilty Wind Farm the form of light
- Page 224 and 225: Camilty Wind Farm Landscape Charact
- Page 226 and 227: Camilty Wind Farm these Lowland Pla
- Page 228 and 229: Camilty Wind Farm from negligible t
- Page 230 and 231: Camilty Wind Farm visible above int
- Page 232 and 233: Camilty Wind Farm slightly diminish
- Page 234 and 235: Camilty Wind Farm forestry. The pro
- Page 236 and 237: Camilty Wind Farm 9.5.118 At night
- Page 238 and 239: Camilty Wind Farm hills, although t
- Page 240 and 241: Camilty Wind Farm gained. The propo
<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />
9.3.50 In order that the baseline assessment of landscape character is consistent across the study<br />
area, and is considered at a level of detail appropriate to the location and scale of the<br />
proposed wind farm, a degree of synthesis has been necessary. This process, undertaken by<br />
RPS, has been in<strong>for</strong>med by SNH, the local authority and other agencies as well as field study<br />
over a number of months.<br />
9.3.51 The 35 km radius study area <strong>for</strong> the development is covered by the following assessments:<br />
• ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Lothians Landscape Character Assessment,<br />
Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 91;<br />
• ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Borders landscape assessment, Scottish Natural<br />
Heritage Review No 112;<br />
• David Tyldesley and Associates, (1995), Dunfermline District Landscape Assessment:<br />
a landscape assessment of Dunfermline District, including part of Kirkcaldy District<br />
lying in the West Fife Woodlands Initiative Area, Natural Heritage Review No 19;<br />
• Ironside Farrar, (Nov 2010), South Lanarkshire Landscape Character Assessment;<br />
• Land Use Consultants, (1999), Glasgow and the Clyde Valley landscape assessment,<br />
Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 116;<br />
• ASH Consulting Group, (1998), Clackmannanshire Landscape Character<br />
Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 96;<br />
• ASH Consulting Group, (1999), Central Region Landscape Character Assessment,<br />
Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 123; and<br />
• David Tyldesley and Associates, (1999), Stirling to Grangemouth Landscape<br />
Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 124.<br />
9.3.52 At a more detailed scale, the differences within each of these character areas become<br />
apparent during research of the baseline conditions. The areas have been identified, located<br />
and described based on desk study and field observation by RPS.<br />
9.3.53 The SNH Landscape Character Assessments identify 68 generic character types within the<br />
35 km radius area of search. Following a review of the descriptions within the text by RPS, it<br />
is considered that some of the character types within different SNH assessments are<br />
equivalent. As the site lies within West Lothian, the landscape character types within The<br />
Lothians Landscape Character Assessment have been used as the basis <strong>for</strong> all character<br />
types within the eight districts of the study area. These were subsequently correlated using<br />
similarities within the character to correspond with a manageable assessment of 8 character<br />
types designed by RPS under the following titles:<br />
• Upland Fringes<br />
• Upland<br />
• Lowland Plateaux<br />
• Lowland Plains<br />
• Lowland Hills<br />
• River Valley<br />
• Coastal<br />
March 2013 9-28 ES Chapter 9<br />
Landscape and Visual<br />
Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©