Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm viewpoint locations are shown on Figures 9.3 to 9.6 and the visualisations (all showing photomontages and wirelines) on Figures 9.14, sets 1a to 26c. 9.2.46 The majority of the photographs were taken in favourable conditions and clear visibility. Where this was not possible, the computer generated wind turbine images have been adjusted to achieve enough contrast to aid visibility. 9.2.47 The blade movement and yaw angle of the wind turbines both vary depending on wind speed and direction. This assessment assumes that the wind turbine blades would be in motion and facing the viewer. It should be noted that there would be occasions when the rotors would be stationary and viewed from the side or obliquely, both of which would reduce the magnitude of change to visual receptors. Assessment of Landscape Effects 9.2.48 The starting point for any assessment is a desk based study of published landscape assessments. A description and evaluation of the landscape of the area over which change is likely to be experienced has been based on these assessments. The assessment of effects is based on this baseline information and also takes into account landscape sensitivity. Value 9.2.49 The assessment, in addition to covering landscape character, seeks to identify landscapes or parts of the landscape resource whose attributes are or may be valued. This may be determined in the first instance through the presence of designations. It should be noted that in virtually all circumstances, landscapes are valued, sometimes highly valued in the local context by various, if not all, sectors of the community. In the absence of established consensus as to a landscape’s value or the value of different parts of the landscape resource, it may be necessary for the assessor to define and apply her/his definition of value. Within this assessment value has been predominantly based on designations, published landscape character assessments and findings from field surveys undertaken by RPS. 9.2.50 With respect to value, the following definitions have been used in this assessment: Table 9.1 Landscape Value (expressed through designation) Value Designation Example High National Very attractive or attractive scenic quality, high or good landscape quality, no or limited potential for substitution. E.g. National Park, NSA or key elements within them. Medium Regional/Local Positive character, typical or in part unusual scenic quality, ordinary landscape quality, potential for substitution. E.g. Regionally or locally designated (RSA/AGLV/SLA) or undesignated but value expressed through literature and cultural associations or through demonstrable use. Low Local Dull, degraded or damaged scenic quality, poor landscape quality, can be readily substituted. E.g. Undesignated. Certain individual landscape elements or features may be worthy of conservation, and landscape either identified or would benefit from restoration or enhancement. March 2013 9-9 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Camilty Wind Farm Condition 9.2.51 The evaluation of condition is based on judgements about the physical state of the landscape resource. It reflects the state of repair of individual features and elements, as indicated by the categories within the scale below, or can be applied to the intactness of the resource as a whole outlined by the corresponding descriptions: Table 9.2 Landscape Condition Condition Very Good Good Ordinary Poor Example Strong structure; very attractive with distinct features worthy of conservation; strong sense of place; no detracting features. Recognisable structure; attractive with many features worthy of conservation; occasional detracting features. Distinguishable structure; common place with limited distinctiveness and features worthy of conservation; some detracting features. Weak structure; evidence of degradation; lacks distinctiveness and sense of place; frequent detracting features. Very Poor Damaged structure; evidence of severe disturbance or dereliction; no distinctiveness; detracting features dominate. 9.2.52 With respect to the assessment of effects, it is necessary to establish in the first instance, whether, and to what extent, the proposed change would exert a locally characterising effect. In essence, it asks the question “would the introduced element become the principal element/feature which determines landscape character?” In these circumstances, the element would be dominant with the surrounding landscape elements being sub-dominant or incidental in comparison. Moving outwards and away from the proposed introduction, the element would exert a lessening effect on landscape character with the surrounding context increasing in influence and becoming co-dominant in a mixed landscape sub-type. Farther afield, the introduced element would become a noticed, then increasingly incidental element, with the original balance of elements reasserting their original dominance. 9.2.53 Appendix 9.4 sets out a series of examples illustrating the potential landscape effects arising from wind farm development and, at the same time, illustrates part of the relationship between landscape effects and visual effects. 9.2.54 Significance in landscape character terms is defined as the extent to which new landscape types/character areas and/or sub-types/areas would be established. This will be determined by considering the key characteristics of the receiving landscape in combination with the magnitude of change arising and the extent to which the key characteristics are felt to be affected locally and over the broader landscape character area/type. 9.2.55 With respect to sensitivity, the GLVIA states that: ‘The sensitivity of the landscape to change is reflected in the degree to which a landscape is able to accommodate change (due to a particular development or land use change) without adverse effects on its character. This may be influenced by the extent of existing or new landform and/or existing vegetation or new planting. These and other factors determine the visibility of the proposed development and therefore influence the extent of its effect on the perceived character and visual amenity of the surrounding March 2013 9-10 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Condition<br />

9.2.51 The evaluation of condition is based on judgements about the physical state of the landscape<br />

resource. It reflects the state of repair of individual features and elements, as indicated by the<br />

categories within the scale below, or can be applied to the intactness of the resource as a<br />

whole outlined by the corresponding descriptions:<br />

Table 9.2 Landscape Condition<br />

Condition<br />

Very Good<br />

Good<br />

Ordinary<br />

Poor<br />

Example<br />

Strong structure; very attractive with distinct features worthy of conservation; strong<br />

sense of place; no detracting features.<br />

Recognisable structure; attractive with many features worthy of conservation;<br />

occasional detracting features.<br />

Distinguishable structure; common place with limited distinctiveness and features<br />

worthy of conservation; some detracting features.<br />

Weak structure; evidence of degradation; lacks distinctiveness and sense of place;<br />

frequent detracting features.<br />

Very Poor Damaged structure; evidence of severe disturbance or dereliction; no<br />

distinctiveness; detracting features dominate.<br />

9.2.52 With respect to the assessment of effects, it is necessary to establish in the first instance,<br />

whether, and to what extent, the proposed change would exert a locally characterising effect.<br />

In essence, it asks the question “would the introduced element become the principal<br />

element/feature which determines landscape character?” In these circumstances, the<br />

element would be dominant with the surrounding landscape elements being sub-dominant or<br />

incidental in comparison. Moving outwards and away from the proposed introduction, the<br />

element would exert a lessening effect on landscape character with the surrounding context<br />

increasing in influence and becoming co-dominant in a mixed landscape sub-type. Farther<br />

afield, the introduced element would become a noticed, then increasingly incidental element,<br />

with the original balance of elements reasserting their original dominance.<br />

9.2.53 Appendix 9.4 sets out a series of examples illustrating the potential landscape effects arising<br />

from wind farm development and, at the same time, illustrates part of the relationship<br />

between landscape effects and visual effects.<br />

9.2.54 Significance in landscape character terms is defined as the extent to which new landscape<br />

types/character areas and/or sub-types/areas would be established. This will be determined<br />

by considering the key characteristics of the receiving landscape in combination with the<br />

magnitude of change arising and the extent to which the key characteristics are felt to be<br />

affected locally and over the broader landscape character area/type.<br />

9.2.55 With respect to sensitivity, the GLVIA states that:<br />

‘The sensitivity of the landscape to change is reflected in the degree to which a<br />

landscape is able to accommodate change (due to a particular development or land use<br />

change) without adverse effects on its character. This may be influenced by the extent of<br />

existing or new land<strong>for</strong>m and/or existing vegetation or new planting. These and other<br />

factors determine the visibility of the proposed development and there<strong>for</strong>e influence the<br />

extent of its effect on the perceived character and visual amenity of the surrounding<br />

March 2013 9-10 ES Chapter 9<br />

Landscape and Visual<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!