Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm
viewpoint locations are shown on Figures 9.3 to 9.6 and the visualisations (all showing
photomontages and wirelines) on Figures 9.14, sets 1a to 26c.
9.2.46 The majority of the photographs were taken in favourable conditions and clear visibility.
Where this was not possible, the computer generated wind turbine images have been
adjusted to achieve enough contrast to aid visibility.
9.2.47 The blade movement and yaw angle of the wind turbines both vary depending on wind speed
and direction. This assessment assumes that the wind turbine blades would be in motion and
facing the viewer. It should be noted that there would be occasions when the rotors would be
stationary and viewed from the side or obliquely, both of which would reduce the magnitude
of change to visual receptors.
Assessment of Landscape Effects
9.2.48 The starting point for any assessment is a desk based study of published landscape
assessments. A description and evaluation of the landscape of the area over which change is
likely to be experienced has been based on these assessments. The assessment of effects is
based on this baseline information and also takes into account landscape sensitivity.
Value
9.2.49 The assessment, in addition to covering landscape character, seeks to identify landscapes or
parts of the landscape resource whose attributes are or may be valued. This may be
determined in the first instance through the presence of designations. It should be noted that
in virtually all circumstances, landscapes are valued, sometimes highly valued in the local
context by various, if not all, sectors of the community. In the absence of established
consensus as to a landscape’s value or the value of different parts of the landscape
resource, it may be necessary for the assessor to define and apply her/his definition of value.
Within this assessment value has been predominantly based on designations, published
landscape character assessments and findings from field surveys undertaken by RPS.
9.2.50 With respect to value, the following definitions have been used in this assessment:
Table 9.1 Landscape Value (expressed through designation)
Value Designation Example
High National Very attractive or attractive scenic quality, high or good landscape
quality, no or limited potential for substitution.
E.g. National Park, NSA or key elements within them.
Medium Regional/Local Positive character, typical or in part unusual scenic quality, ordinary
landscape quality, potential for substitution.
E.g. Regionally or locally designated (RSA/AGLV/SLA) or
undesignated but value expressed through literature and cultural
associations or through demonstrable use.
Low Local Dull, degraded or damaged scenic quality, poor landscape quality, can
be readily substituted.
E.g. Undesignated. Certain individual landscape elements or features
may be worthy of conservation, and landscape either identified or
would benefit from restoration or enhancement.
March 2013 9-9 ES Chapter 9
Landscape and Visual
Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©