Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm • The Scottish Government Scottish Planning Policy SPP. (February 2010); • Sustainable Development Commission, Wind Power in the UK – A guide to the key issues surrounding onshore wind power development in the UK (2005). 9.2.10 The principal objectives of the assessment are: • To describe, classify and evaluate the existing landscape and visual resources / receptors likely to be affected by the proposed construction, operation and decommissioning phases of the project; and • To assess the significance of the effects of the proposals on the landscape resource visual receptors, taking into account the measures proposed to mitigate any effects identified. Positive and Negative Effects 9.2.11 Wind energy development, wherever it occurs, is usually visible, i.e. wind farms require an exposed position, generally an upland location or, alternatively, a large area of generally level and open landscape. It also tends to have a characterising effect upon the landscape, depending upon the scale of the proposal and the character of the environment into which it is placed. The proposed wind farm would have the following general attributes typical of most wind farms: engineered, large scale, simple in form, smooth texture, monochrome/muted colour and strong vertical form. Responses by people to wind farms can vary from ‘beautiful’ to ‘offensive’, with respondents perceiving wind turbines as potentially rhythmic, unusual, safe, interesting, invigorating, majestic and spiritual on the one hand and degrading, jarring, overbearing, industrial, clashing and ugly on the other. Wind energy development thus gives rise to a spectrum of responses from individuals and organisations who perceive its effects ranging from strongly adverse to strongly positive. 9.2.12 The likely significant effects should be described covering type (i.e. direct, indirect or cumulative), temporal nature (short, medium and long term, permanent or temporary), and valency (positive and negative or adverse). Accordingly, judgements as to valency of the effect should be given and justified in an explicit and transparent manner since they are inevitably subjective. 9.2.13 The heading ‘valency’, originally used in the Durham County Council Impact Assessment Matrices (unpublished, 1996) but now much more widely recognised, is an important one and provides scope to recognise that change of whatever type and scale within a landscape can be viewed positively or negatively by different individuals. For the purposes of this assessment, effects have been defined based on the scenario of an individual who may perceive the wind farm as a negative addition to the landscape or view. Effects are therefore defined as adverse throughout the assessment; but may in fact be seen as positive by large numbers of viewers. An individual who perceives wind farms as a positive addition to the landscape or view may consider the same effects to be beneficial or neutral in nature. Further definition of valency and public attitudes to wind energy development can be found at Appendix 9.1. Baseline Information (Baseline and Cumulative Schemes) 9.2.14 The baseline for EIA purposes is taken as being the existing situation at submission of the application ( 2013), including operational wind farms and those under construction. The site is located within an area of commercial forestry managed by FCS. The ongoing March 2013 9-3 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Camilty Wind Farm management of this forest is defined within the FDP. Management operations include felling and replanting of trees progressively within the site change the baseline situation. However, the changes are considered to be on a relatively small scale and would not justify the identification of an interim, future baseline situation, in 2016 when construction of the scheme would commence, against which the proposal would be assessed. The baseline includes any other commercial wind farms that are either operational, consented, or formally in the planning system at the time of submission of the application. However, those for which a planning application has been submitted and have since been withdrawn without any assurances that a revised or modified application is known to be pending, are not included in the assessment. 9.2.15 The cumulative effects of two or more wind farm schemes should include the effects of all those wind farms within 60 km. The assessment concentrates on cumulative wind farms within a 35 km radius of the site; and, more specifically, those developments which are likely to influence the decision making process. Nature and Scope of Effects 9.2.16 Landscape effects derive from changes in the physical landscape, which may give rise to changes to its palette of key characteristics and thus its character and how this is experienced. This may in turn affect the perceived value ascribed to the landscape. 9.2.17 Visual effects relate to the changes that arise in the composition of available views as a result of changes to the landscape, to people’s responses to the changes and to the overall effects with respect to visual amenity. 9.2.18 Standard practice treats landscape and visual effects separately and, as a matter of convention, landscape effects have been dealt with first within this chapter. Assessment Process 9.2.19 The assessment of landscape effects for the project has followed a recognised process set out below: • Identify the baseline landscape resource (e.g. individual landscape elements and landscape character) and its value; • Identify forces for change in the landscape of the surrounding area; • Evaluate the sensitivity of the landscape resource to the type of development proposed; • Identify potential landscape effects of the project through review of initial plans; • Develop measures to avoid, reduce and ameliorate adverse effects; • Identify scale or magnitude of change proposed; • Assess the significance of effects of the project on the landscape, taking into account the mitigation measures proposed; and • Report the findings of the assessment. 9.2.20 The assessment of visual effects followed a recognised process set out below: • Identify potential visual receptors of the project (i.e. people who will have views of the development); March 2013 9-4 ES Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Copyright Partnerships for Renewables Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

• The Scottish Government Scottish Planning Policy SPP. (February 2010);<br />

• Sustainable Development Commission, <strong>Wind</strong> Power in the UK – A guide to the key<br />

issues surrounding onshore wind power development in the UK (2005).<br />

9.2.10 The principal objectives of the assessment are:<br />

• To describe, classify and evaluate the existing landscape and visual resources /<br />

receptors likely to be affected by the proposed construction, operation and<br />

decommissioning phases of the project; and<br />

• To assess the significance of the effects of the proposals on the landscape resource<br />

visual receptors, taking into account the measures proposed to mitigate any effects<br />

identified.<br />

Positive and Negative Effects<br />

9.2.11 <strong>Wind</strong> energy development, wherever it occurs, is usually visible, i.e. wind farms require an<br />

exposed position, generally an upland location or, alternatively, a large area of generally level<br />

and open landscape. It also tends to have a characterising effect upon the landscape,<br />

depending upon the scale of the proposal and the character of the environment into which it<br />

is placed. The proposed wind farm would have the following general attributes typical of most<br />

wind farms: engineered, large scale, simple in <strong>for</strong>m, smooth texture, monochrome/muted<br />

colour and strong vertical <strong>for</strong>m. Responses by people to wind farms can vary from ‘beautiful’<br />

to ‘offensive’, with respondents perceiving wind turbines as potentially rhythmic, unusual,<br />

safe, interesting, invigorating, majestic and spiritual on the one hand and degrading, jarring,<br />

overbearing, industrial, clashing and ugly on the other. <strong>Wind</strong> energy development thus gives<br />

rise to a spectrum of responses from individuals and organisations who perceive its effects<br />

ranging from strongly adverse to strongly positive.<br />

9.2.12 The likely significant effects should be described covering type (i.e. direct, indirect or<br />

cumulative), temporal nature (short, medium and long term, permanent or temporary), and<br />

valency (positive and negative or adverse). Accordingly, judgements as to valency of the<br />

effect should be given and justified in an explicit and transparent manner since they are<br />

inevitably subjective.<br />

9.2.13 The heading ‘valency’, originally used in the Durham County Council Impact Assessment<br />

Matrices (unpublished, 1996) but now much more widely recognised, is an important one and<br />

provides scope to recognise that change of whatever type and scale within a landscape can<br />

be viewed positively or negatively by different individuals. For the purposes of this<br />

assessment, effects have been defined based on the scenario of an individual who may<br />

perceive the wind farm as a negative addition to the landscape or view. Effects are there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

defined as adverse throughout the assessment; but may in fact be seen as positive by large<br />

numbers of viewers. An individual who perceives wind farms as a positive addition to the<br />

landscape or view may consider the same effects to be beneficial or neutral in nature. Further<br />

definition of valency and public attitudes to wind energy development can be found at<br />

Appendix 9.1.<br />

Baseline In<strong>for</strong>mation (Baseline and Cumulative Schemes)<br />

9.2.14 The baseline <strong>for</strong> EIA purposes is taken as being the existing situation at submission of the<br />

application ( 2013), including operational wind farms and those under construction. The<br />

site is located within an area of commercial <strong>for</strong>estry managed by FCS. The ongoing<br />

March 2013 9-3 ES Chapter 9<br />

Landscape and Visual<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!