07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

9.2.3 A plan within the Scoping Report of July 2012 illustrating a preliminary zone of theoretical<br />

visibility (ZTV) based on a 130m blade tip height <strong>for</strong> a 14 turbine scheme and 25 candidate<br />

viewpoint locations provided the basis <strong>for</strong> the consultation. The assessment has<br />

subsequently been based on a maximum 132m high turbine as a worst case scenario<br />

discussed further in Chapter 4. SNH suggested new viewpoints at Harburn House, Five<br />

Sister’s West Calder, and the B8084 south of Armadale. SNH also suggested replacing the<br />

viewpoint at East Cairn Hill <strong>for</strong> West Cairn Hill and replacing Dechmont Low with Howden<br />

House Livingston. WLC was content with the choice of viewpoints.<br />

9.2.4 A final list of 26 candidate viewpoints was established following the consultation process. The<br />

locations were visited and photography undertaken to establish their relevance within the<br />

assessment process.<br />

9.2.5 Other specific issues raised by SNH include:<br />

• Consideration should be given during the design phase to existing, consented and<br />

planned wind farms in the vicinity.<br />

9.2.6 This LVIA addresses the main issues of concern raised by WLC, as determining authority,<br />

and statutory consultees during the pre-application consultations.<br />

9.2.7 There has been ongoing public consultation on the emerging design of the proposed wind<br />

farm through public exhibitions, local meetings and meetings with individual local residents.<br />

Published Guidance<br />

9.2.8 As a matter of best practice, this assessment has been undertaken based on published<br />

guidance on landscape and visual assessment. This includes:<br />

• Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment<br />

(2002) Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 2 nd Edition;<br />

• Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage (2002) Landscape Character<br />

Assessment – Guidance <strong>for</strong> England and Scotland;<br />

• Landscape Institute, Advice Note 01/11 Photography and Photomontage in<br />

Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment.<br />

9.2.9 There is also a range of best practice guidance specifically <strong>for</strong> the assessment of wind farms.<br />

The following documents, amongst others, have been taken into consideration:<br />

• Scottish Natural Heritage, Visual Representation of <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong>s: Good Practice<br />

Guidance (dated 2006, published 2007);<br />

• Scottish Natural Heritage, Assessing the Cumulative Impacts of Onshore <strong>Wind</strong><br />

Energy Developments, (March 2012);<br />

• Scottish Natural Heritage, Siting and Designing <strong>Wind</strong>farms in the Landscape (Dec.<br />

2009);<br />

• Scottish Natural Heritage, The Special Qualities of the National Scenic Areas (2010);<br />

• ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Lothians Landscape Character Assessment,<br />

Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 91;<br />

• Scottish Government web-based renewables advice (superseded PAN 45);<br />

• PAN 68 – Design Statements;<br />

March 2013 9-2 ES Chapter 9<br />

Landscape and Visual<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!