07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

• The duration and level of exposure.<br />

8.2.13 For the purposes of this assessment, a quiet daytime fixed lower limit of 35dB L A90,10min has<br />

been selected. For reference, the quiet daytime fixed lower limit selected <strong>for</strong> the neighbouring<br />

proposed Harburnhead <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> is 40dB(A) and 38dB(A) <strong>for</strong> Fauch Hill <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong>.<br />

8.2.14 It should be noted that the limit derived from the quiet daytime periods of the baseline noise<br />

survey, as defined in ETSU-R-97 and described in paragraph 8.2.11 above, should be<br />

applied to the whole daytime period (0700 – 2300h) and should not be interpreted as allowing<br />

higher operational noise levels outwith these hours.<br />

Institute of Acoustics (IoA) Bulletin Article Volume 34 No. 2, March / April 2009<br />

8.2.15 In the March/April 2009 issue of Acoustics Bulletin, published by the IoA, a group of acoustic<br />

consultants considered specialists in their field produced a paper which aimed to standardise<br />

certain elements of the assessment of noise from operational wind farms. The paper<br />

addressed three main issues:<br />

• To address local wind shear, measured background noise levels should be correlated<br />

with derived and not measured wind speeds at 10 m above local ground height. A<br />

methodology is described which has been applied <strong>for</strong> the purposes of this<br />

assessment;<br />

• The preferred method of prediction <strong>for</strong> the propagation of operational turbine noise is<br />

ISO 9613-2. Particular attention is drawn to establishing whether the manufacturer’s<br />

data obtained is warranted or otherwise which has an effect on the ground absorption<br />

selected <strong>for</strong> the model. Guidance on assumed atmospheric conditions and assumed<br />

barrier attenuation from topography is also provided; and<br />

• There is agreement among the authors that there is currently no robust evidence that<br />

low frequency sound, infrasound or ground borne vibration from operational turbines<br />

adversely affect neighbouring sensitive dwellings.<br />

8.2.16 The recommendations made in this article have been taken into account in this chapter; the<br />

document is referred to throughout as the ‘IoA Bulletin article’.<br />

British Standard 5228 (2009) Code of Practice <strong>for</strong> Noise and Vibration Control on<br />

Construction and Open Sites Part 1: Noise<br />

8.2.17 BS 5228 Part 1: Noise provides guidance, in<strong>for</strong>mation and procedures on the control of noise<br />

and vibration from construction sites. It includes a comprehensive best practice guide to<br />

minimising the adverse effects of noise from construction sites and a database of plant and<br />

activity noise levels <strong>for</strong> undertaking predictive assessments.<br />

Construction and Decommissioning Noise and Vibration<br />

8.2.18 Potentially noisy activities relating to wind farm construction include <strong>for</strong>mation of access<br />

tracks, crane pads, the construction compound and turbine foundations, erection of turbines,<br />

site cabling and installation of the substation building/trans<strong>for</strong>mer.<br />

8.2.19 Due to the transient and necessary nature of the works and large distances between the<br />

development area and the closest identified dwellings, significant impacts are unlikely. A<br />

qualitative assessment has there<strong>for</strong>e been presented which considers the implementation of<br />

Best Practicable Means, as defined in the Control of Pollution Act (CoPA) (1974) to ensure<br />

that noise associated with the works is minimised in so far as is reasonably practicable. It is<br />

March 2013 8-3 ES Chapter 8<br />

Noise<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!