07.02.2014 Views

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

Camilty Wind Farm - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Camilty</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong><br />

Table 6.1 Proposed <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> Carbon Balance and Payback (assuming 3.4 MW<br />

turbine)<br />

Payback<br />

Time<br />

Carbon<br />

Gains<br />

(t CO 2 eq)<br />

Carbon<br />

Losses<br />

(t CO 2 eq)<br />

Net<br />

Emissions<br />

of CO 2<br />

(t CO 2 eq)<br />

Total<br />

Payback<br />

Time (Coal<br />

Fired)<br />

Total<br />

Payback<br />

Time<br />

(Grid-Mix)<br />

Total<br />

Payback<br />

Time (Fossil<br />

Fuel)<br />

Expected -71 49519 49448 1.2 2.4 1.7<br />

Minimum 3 21377 20550 0.4 0.8 0.6<br />

Maximum -827 132920 132923 3.9 8.0 5.8<br />

6.5.8 The estimated total carbon payback time of the proposed wind energy development, based<br />

on carbon losses and gains compared with fossil fuel generation, is expected to be 1.7 years,<br />

with a minimum payback time of 0.6 years and a maximum payback time of 5.8 years.<br />

6.5.9 This is increased to an expected 2.4 years against the grid mix of electricity generation, which<br />

includes other renewable electricity sources and the payback is decreased to an expected<br />

1.2 years compared with coal-fired electricity generation.<br />

6.5.10 It should be noted that although the CO 2 emitted during wind farm construction is taken into<br />

account in this calculation, that produced from construction of the other <strong>for</strong>ms of power<br />

stations is not – there<strong>for</strong>e, in some ways this calculation is biased against wind generation.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, when considering the 25 year operational period of the proposed wind energy<br />

development, the CO 2 payback time is very short in comparison.<br />

6.6 References<br />

• BWEA (2005), Power of the wind blows away myths, Available at:<br />

http://www.bwea.com/media/news/141105.html<br />

• DECC (2012), Excel Spreadsheet of Sub-National Local Authority Electricity<br />

Consumption Statistics 2005 to 2011. Available at:<br />

http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/energy_stats/regional/electricity/elect<br />

ricity.aspx)<br />

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49418/4<br />

820-subnat-auth-electricity-cons-2005-2010.xls<br />

• DEFRA (2011), Sustainable Products and Consumers, Available at:<br />

http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/what/index.htm<br />

• European Commission (2000), Towards a European Strategy <strong>for</strong> the Security of<br />

Energy Supply, European Communities, Italy<br />

• National Records of Scotland (2011), West Lothian Council Area – Demographic<br />

Factsheet, Available at: http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/files2/stats/council-area-datasheets/west-lothian-factsheet.pdf<br />

• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), AR4 Climate Change 2007<br />

Synthesis Report, Geneva, Switzerland<br />

March 2013 6-7 ES Chapter 6<br />

Climate Change and Atmospheric Emissions<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> Development Co. Ltd 2013 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!