School Improvement Plan (SIP) - Oak Park Elementary School ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Unit One Math Vocabulary$

Abraham Lincoln Elem School nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Do the other data add clarity to the state assessment data? 5/15/2012 3:50:05 PM School Improvement Plan 2011 Page 50 of 52 nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Does the analysis, along with the other data, provide clear direction for the selection of the objectives, strategies, and activities? IDENTIFICATION OF KEY FACTORS nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Have data or research been used to determine the key factors believed to cause low performance? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Are the key factors within the district’s capacity to change or control? [C] CLARITY OF OBJECTIVES nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Has the SIP team stated measurable objectives that clarify the present areas needed for improvement for the two years of the plan? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Do the objectives address all areas of AYP deficiency? [C] ALIGNMENT OF STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Is there a clear relationship between the key factors believed to have caused low achievement and the strategies and activities selected? nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Will the selected strategies and activities likely improve student learning and achievement? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Are the strategies and activities measurable? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Are the measures of progress for the strategies and activities clearly identified? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Are expectations for classroom behavior and practice related to the objectives clear? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Is professional development aligned with the strategies and activities for students? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Do the professional development strategies and activities directly address the factors that caused the school to be identified in status or in special education non-compliance? nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Do the parent involvement strategies clearly align with the strategies and activities for students? [C] Do these parent activities relate to the factors contributing to low achievement and will they engage parents in sharing responsibility for nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A ©2011 Illinois Interactive Report Card, student Northern learning? Illinois University
Do the professional development strategies and activities directly address the factors that caused the school to be identified in status or in nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A special education non-compliance? Abraham Lincoln Elem School 5/15/2012 3:50:05 PM School Improvement Plan 2011 Page 51 of 52 nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Do the parent involvement strategies clearly align with the strategies and activities for students? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Do these parent activities relate to the factors contributing to low achievement and will they engage parents in sharing responsibility for student learning? nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Are timelines reasonable and resources coordinated to achieve the objectives? [C] MONITORING nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Is it clear who will oversee progress of the objectives and take responsibility for ensuring implementation of the plan? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Will the collection of strategies and activities, along with the monitoring process, provide sufficient direction for plan implementers? [C] PART I - COMMENTS PART II - SECTIONS III and IV OF THE PLAN PARENT NOTIFICATION nmlkj Yes nmlkj No nmlkj N/A Does this plan describe how the school has provided written notice about the school’s academic status identification to parents of each student in a format and, to the extent practicable, in a language that parents can understand? (Title I Schools Only) [C] STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Does the plan describe how stakeholders have been consulted? [C] nmlkj Yes nmlkj No Does the SIP team include a cross section of teachers, experts, parents, and other stakeholders to develop a plan on behalf of students that will best effect necessary changes? [C] PEER REVIEW Is the peer review process described and is there evidence that this plan has been subjected to rigorous review to ensure that it will have nmlkj Yes nmlkj No “the greatest likelihood” of ensuring that all groups will achieve AYP? [C] ©2011 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University TEACHER MENTORING PROCESS
Page 1 and 2: Abraham Lincoln Elem School 5/15/20
Page 5 and 6: * Includes only students enrolled a
Page 9 and 10: R 2006 55.9 29.2 4.0 3.5 0.1 7.4 -
Page 11 and 12: I 2007 1.6 18.4 99.8 95.5 6.8 1 - -
Page 13 and 14: 2008 5,040 554 529 525 560 532 - T
Page 15 and 16: 2010 392 13 72,208 26 75 16 - - - 2
Page 17 and 18: 63.7 66.7 50.0 52.4 73.7 - 42.9 50.
Page 19 and 20: 72.8 75.0 78.6 66.7 94.7 - 78.5 83.
Page 21 and 22: Percent of students Below Percent o
Page 23 and 24: In Math, the greatest areas of need
Page 27 and 28: 51 Black 49% 63% Abraham Lincoln El
Page 29 and 30: 63% of those below the 50 percentil
Page 37 and 38: Principal will document progress on
Page 45 and 46: 1. Contracting with West 40 Interme
Page 49: Abraham Lincoln Elem School 5/15/20

School Improvement Plan (SIP) - Oak Park Elementary School ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?