FREEDOM AND CONSTRAINT ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION

FREEDOM AND CONSTRAINT ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION FREEDOM AND CONSTRAINT ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION

doc.utwente.nl
from doc.utwente.nl More from this publisher
04.02.2014 Views

7 b 1 b 5 actuator 1 b 2 b 6 b 3 h 3 h 5 h 7 h 8 b8 h 4 h 1 h 2 h 6 h 9 released in the beams nearest to the platform. Overconstraints in loop h 1 -h 4 -h 5 -h 2 should be released in link b 7 . Torsionally compliant beams h 1 h 4 h 3 h 5 h 7 Sensor Actuator Notch pivot flexures h 8 h 9 Actuator Sensor Platform Torsionally compliant beam b 4 actuator 2 h 6 h 2 Figure 6. Two-DOF stage. All hinge-joints are made by cross flexure hinges. Hinges h 10 and h 11 and the top frame plate are not implemented. Figure 4. Two DOF mechanism with 2 motions. Torsion released Out-of-plane bending released Torsion released max stress no stress Figure 5. An overconstrained mode of the total mechanism. OPTIMIZING THE LOCATION OF RELEASES For the application of this mechanism the first natural frequency with blocked actuators should be as high as possible. Therefore some 9216 exact constraint configurations have been analyzed using the multibody model with SVD analysis and have been ranked on their first natural frequency using a modal analysis. It can be concluded that the best configurations show release of the out-of-plane bending related constraints nearest to the end-effector, the notch pivot flexures in Figure 6. Release of the overconstraint torsion is less critical and is CONCLUSION Only exact constraint designs show a combination of high stiffness and low internal stress arising from a possible misalignment. The SVD analysis can be conveniently used to choose the best location and direction for implementing release flexures. With the aim of maximizing the stress reduction, release flexures should be implemented in the part of the overconstrained loop where the internal moment is the highest. At the same time the stiffness at the end-effector can be kept high. The design approach using SVD analysis leads to predictable, high stiffness and low internal stress designs. REFERENCES [1] Soemers HMJR, Design Principles for Precision Mechanisms, T-Point print, 2010, ISBN 978-90-365-3103-0. [2] Grübler M, Allgemeine Eigenschaften der zwangläufigen ebenen kinematischen Ketten, Civilingenieur 29, 1883, 167. [3] Aarts RGKM, Meijaard JP and Jonker JB, Flexible multibody modelling for exact constraint design of compliant mechanisms, Multibody Systems Dynamics, accepted. [4] Meijaard JP, et.al., Analytical and experimental investigation of a parallel leafspring guidance, Multibody Syst. Dyn., 2010, Volume 23, Issue 1, 77-97.

7<br />

b 1<br />

b 5<br />

actuator 1 b 2<br />

b 6<br />

b 3<br />

h 3<br />

h 5<br />

h 7<br />

h 8<br />

b8<br />

h 4<br />

h 1<br />

h 2<br />

h 6<br />

h 9<br />

released in the beams nearest to the platform.<br />

Overconstraints in loop h 1 -h 4 -h 5 -h 2 should be<br />

released in link b 7 .<br />

Torsionally compliant<br />

beams<br />

h 1<br />

h 4<br />

h 3<br />

h 5<br />

h 7<br />

Sensor<br />

Actuator<br />

Notch pivot<br />

flexures<br />

h 8<br />

h 9<br />

Actuator<br />

Sensor<br />

Platform<br />

Torsionally<br />

compliant<br />

beam<br />

b 4<br />

actuator 2<br />

h 6<br />

h 2<br />

Figure 6. Two-DOF stage. All hinge-joints are<br />

made by cross flexure hinges. Hinges h 10 and<br />

h 11 and the top frame plate are not implemented.<br />

Figure 4. Two DOF mechanism with 2 motions.<br />

Torsion<br />

released<br />

Out-of-plane bending<br />

released<br />

Torsion<br />

released<br />

max<br />

stress<br />

no<br />

stress<br />

Figure 5. An overconstrained mode of the total<br />

mechanism.<br />

OPTIMIZING THE LOCATION OF RELEASES<br />

For the application of this mechanism the first<br />

natural frequency with blocked actuators should<br />

be as high as possible. Therefore some 9216<br />

exact constraint configurations have been<br />

analyzed using the multibody model with SVD<br />

analysis and have been ranked on their first<br />

natural frequency using a modal analysis. It can<br />

be concluded that the best configurations show<br />

release of the out-of-plane bending related<br />

constraints nearest to the end-effector, the notch<br />

pivot flexures in Figure 6. Release of the<br />

overconstraint torsion is less critical and is<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Only exact constraint designs show a<br />

combination of high stiffness and low internal<br />

stress arising from a possible misalignment. The<br />

SVD analysis can be conveniently used to<br />

choose the best location and direction for<br />

implementing release flexures. With the aim of<br />

maximizing the stress reduction, release flexures<br />

should be implemented in the part of the<br />

overconstrained loop where the internal moment<br />

is the highest. At the same time the stiffness at<br />

the end-effector can be kept high. The design<br />

approach using SVD analysis leads to<br />

predictable, high stiffness and low internal stress<br />

designs.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Soemers HMJR, Design Principles for<br />

Precision Mechanisms, T-Point print, 2010,<br />

ISBN 978-90-365-3103-0.<br />

[2] Grübler M, Allgemeine Eigenschaften der<br />

zwangläufigen ebenen kinematischen<br />

Ketten, Civilingenieur 29, 1883, 167.<br />

[3] Aarts RGKM, Meijaard JP and Jonker JB,<br />

Flexible multibody modelling for exact<br />

constraint design of compliant mechanisms,<br />

Multibody Systems Dynamics, accepted.<br />

[4] Meijaard JP, et.al., Analytical and<br />

experimental investigation of a parallel<br />

leafspring guidance, Multibody Syst. Dyn.,<br />

2010, Volume 23, Issue 1, 77-97.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!