FFLO and related phases
FFLO and related phases FFLO and related phases
FFLO and related phases Daniel Agterberg – University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Thanks to Paolo Frigeri, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Manfred Sigrist (ETH-Zurich), Huiqiu Yuan, Myron Salamon (UIUC), Akihisha Koga (Osaka University) , Raminder Kaur, Shantanu Mukherjee, and Zhichao Zheng (UWM) Lecture 4: Broken Parity Superconductors - continuation FFLO and Helical Phases Fractional Vortices in FFLO Making a charge 4e superconductor in 2D
- Page 2 and 3: Superconductivity Broken Inversion
- Page 4 and 5: Spin-Susceptibility-Triplet: Sr 2 R
- Page 6 and 7: Experimental Results CeIrSi 3 : Ras
- Page 8 and 9: CePt 3 Si • The protected spin-tr
- Page 10 and 11: CePt 3 Si A small s-wave mixing cha
- Page 12 and 13: Singlet pairing in a Zeeman field:
- Page 14 and 15: Parity Broken Case k+q -k+q field N
- Page 16 and 17: Ginzburg Landau origin of helical P
- Page 18 and 19: Ginzburg-Landau-Wilson Theory of FF
- Page 20 and 21: Standard Vortex The free energy has
- Page 22 and 23: LO Phase ½ vortices U(1)xU(1) symm
- Page 24 and 25: Thermal Fluctuations in LO superflu
<strong>FFLO</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>related</strong> <strong>phases</strong><br />
Daniel Agterberg – University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee<br />
Thanks to Paolo Frigeri, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Manfred Sigrist (ETH-Zurich),<br />
Huiqiu Yuan, Myron Salamon (UIUC), Akihisha Koga (Osaka University) ,<br />
Raminder Kaur, Shantanu Mukherjee, <strong>and</strong> Zhichao Zheng (UWM)<br />
Lecture 4:<br />
Broken Parity Superconductors - continuation<br />
<strong>FFLO</strong> <strong>and</strong> Helical Phases<br />
Fractional Vortices in <strong>FFLO</strong><br />
Making a charge 4e superconductor in 2D
Superconductivity<br />
Broken Inversion appears through:<br />
First derive the gap equation within weak-coupling<br />
assuming Δ
Spin Susceptibility
Spin-Susceptibility-Triplet: Sr 2 RuO 4<br />
Spin triplet: Sr 2 RuO 4<br />
The spin-susceptibility is<br />
unchanged when Hod=0<br />
K. Ishida et al., Nature 396, 658 (1998).<br />
J.A.Duffy et al. , PRL 85, 5412 (2000).
Spin Susceptibility<br />
singlet<br />
Note α>>Δ for CePt 3 Si<br />
L.P. Gorkov <strong>and</strong> E.I. Rashba, PRL 87 036004 (2001).<br />
P.A. Frigeri, DFA, M. Sigrist, New J.Phys. 6 115 (2004).<br />
triplet<br />
Spin susceptibility becomes the same for singlet <strong>and</strong> triplet
Experimental Results<br />
CeIrSi 3 : Rashba<br />
Mukuda et al PRL 2010
Strong SO: Two B<strong>and</strong> System
CePt 3 Si<br />
• The protected spin-triplet state for<br />
CePt 3 Si is:<br />
• Symmetry requires that g(k) vanishes<br />
at points on the Fermi surface:
CePt 3 Si – line nodes<br />
• The protected spin-triplet state has point<br />
nodes for k x =k y =0.<br />
• Line nodes have been observed<br />
Bonalde, PRL 2005 Izawa, PRL 2005
CePt 3 Si<br />
A small s-wave mixing changes the point-nodes<br />
of the protected d(k) to line nodes.<br />
A similar story applies to Li 2 Pt 3 B <strong>and</strong> Li 2 Pd 3 B
<strong>FFLO</strong>, PDW, <strong>and</strong> single-q<br />
(helical) states
Singlet pairing in a Zeeman field: <strong>FFLO</strong><br />
Key Point of FF <strong>and</strong> LO: Pairing between fermions with different<br />
Fermi surfaces leads to “finite momentum” pairing states (<strong>FFLO</strong>).<br />
(FF)<br />
(LO)<br />
These <strong>phases</strong> sensitive to disorder<br />
The general class of such states in known as pair density wave<br />
(PDW) states.
Broken Parity Case<br />
Broken parity <strong>and</strong> magnetic field: no symmetries left to ensure k<br />
<strong>and</strong> –k both lie on the Fermi surface.<br />
Will focus microscopic theory on Rashba case with field in plane.<br />
Observation of simultaneous ferromagnetism <strong>and</strong> superconductivity<br />
at LaAlO 3 <strong>and</strong> SrTiO 3 provides a 2D application of this problem.
Parity Broken Case<br />
k+q<br />
-k+q<br />
field<br />
No ASOC With ASOC With ASOC <strong>and</strong><br />
Zeeman Field<br />
Can pair every state on one Fermi surface.<br />
two b<strong>and</strong>s prefer opposite q vectors.<br />
The
Phase Diagram<br />
Multiple q-phase<br />
N 1 =N 2 , δN=0<br />
Multiple q-phase<br />
δN=0.05<br />
H<br />
Single-q phase<br />
H<br />
Uniform phase<br />
Single-q (helical) phase<br />
T/Tc<br />
T/Tc<br />
Single-q phase:<br />
Multiple-q phase:<br />
Two different values of q appear – why?
Ginzburg L<strong>and</strong>au origin of helical Phase<br />
In broken parity superconductors – new terms appear in<br />
the GL theory (Lifschitz invariants)<br />
Induces a “single q” solution in a uniform magnetic field<br />
with<br />
Lifschitz invariant origin suggests helical phase will exist<br />
even with impurities. Helical phase has no super current.
Single Phase Tc Results for Rashba<br />
Barzykin <strong>and</strong> Gorkov, PRL (2002); DFA, Physica C (2003);<br />
Kaur, DFA, Sigrist PRL (2004); DFA <strong>and</strong> Kaur PRB (2007);<br />
Dimitrova <strong>and</strong> Feigel’man , PRB (2007); Samokhin, PRB (2008);<br />
Mineev <strong>and</strong> Samokhin (2008).<br />
Michaeli, Potter, Lee, cond-mat (2011)<br />
(LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 interfaces)<br />
Survives to high Fields in disordered 2D Rashba
Ginzburg-L<strong>and</strong>au-Wilson<br />
Theory of <strong>FFLO</strong> states
Theory of ψ Qx <strong>and</strong> ψ -Qx <br />
<strong>FFLO</strong>-like phase:<br />
symmetry!<br />
General feature:<br />
Gauge invariance<br />
Translational invariance
St<strong>and</strong>ard Vortex<br />
The free energy has a U(1) gauge invariance.<br />
Consider a line-defect in the wave function:<br />
Far from the vortex core<br />
φ<br />
The flux contained by a vortex is quantized
<strong>FFLO</strong> “Vortices”<br />
(n,m) vortices. Consider (1,0) vortex in a phase where the<br />
magnitudes of the components far from the vortex core are<br />
equal<br />
then<br />
(1,1) vortex is usual Abrikosov vortex with flux Φ 0
LO Phase ½ vortices<br />
U(1)xU(1) symmetry implies Ψ -Q <strong>and</strong> Ψ Q single valued<br />
PDW displacement “phonon” field<br />
usual phase field<br />
Single valued :<br />
Charge Density :<br />
Edge dislocation in charge density from ½ vortex<br />
Uniform SC (charge 4):
2D superfluid: thermal<br />
excitation of vortices<br />
• Free energy governed by phase<br />
fluctuations:<br />
• The energy of a vortex is:<br />
• The entropy is:<br />
above which vortices proliferate<br />
below Tc
Thermal Fluctuations in LO superfluids<br />
Energy of ½ vortex :<br />
Energy of single vortex :<br />
Energy of single dislocation :<br />
CDW<br />
PDW<br />
Disordered<br />
4SF
Superconductors<br />
Summary: 2D LO Phase<br />
A screens 1/r leading to a finite energy vortex<br />
Dislocations still cost log(R/a) energy.<br />
CDW order survives while SC order does not. (Agterberg <strong>and</strong> Tsunetsugu 2008)<br />
Rotationally invariant superfluids<br />
δQ screens 1/r leading to a finite energy dislocation, vortices cost log(R/a) energy.<br />
Charge 4 superfluid order survives while CDW order does not. (Radzihovsky <strong>and</strong> Vishwanath<br />
PRL 2009)<br />
Berg, Fradkin, Kivelson argue charge 4e SC without rotational invariance (Nature Physics<br />
2009) – last slide