01.02.2014 Views

Minutes of the Meeting of the Audit Committee ... - Trafford College

Minutes of the Meeting of the Audit Committee ... - Trafford College

Minutes of the Meeting of the Audit Committee ... - Trafford College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on Wednesday 28 April 2010<br />

at 5.00 pm in <strong>the</strong> Boardroom<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Altrincham Centre<br />

Present<br />

Jed Hassid (Chairperson)<br />

Tabitha Gardner<br />

Chris Humm<br />

Muir Miller<br />

In Attendance<br />

Barry Watson, Clerk to <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

Antoinette Lythgoe, Vice Principal Corporate Planning<br />

Lisa Randall, RSM Tenon<br />

Angela Brooks, Director <strong>of</strong> MIS<br />

Gail Haworth, Director <strong>of</strong> HR<br />

Prior to <strong>the</strong> commencement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meeting <strong>the</strong> Chairperson welcomed Chris Humm to his first<br />

<strong>Committee</strong> meeting.<br />

Minute No.<br />

AUDIT/01/10<br />

Apologies for absence<br />

The Clerk to <strong>the</strong> Corporation reported that apologies for absence had been<br />

received from Marie Mohan.<br />

AUDIT/02/10<br />

Declarations <strong>of</strong> direct or indirect interest in any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following items<br />

There were no declarations <strong>of</strong> interest in any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meetings business items.<br />

AUDIT/03/10 <strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 2 December 2009<br />

The <strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meeting were approved and accepted as a correct<br />

account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meeting’s proceedings.<br />

AUDIT/04/10<br />

Matters Arising from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Minutes</strong><br />

i) AUDIT/40/09 – <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> Self Assessment<br />

The Clerk to <strong>the</strong> Corporation presented a report which made proposals for a<br />

revised process <strong>of</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> Self Assessment.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered <strong>the</strong> proposals in detail and after discussion it was<br />

agreed that <strong>the</strong> proposals as detailed in <strong>the</strong> Clerk to <strong>the</strong> Corporation’s report<br />

be accepted and implemented for <strong>the</strong> year 2009/2010.<br />

C2.4.3/JBW/ML/04.05.2010 Version 3


2<br />

Minute No.<br />

It was also agreed that <strong>the</strong> Vice Principal Corporate Planning and <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Audit</strong>ors should take part in <strong>the</strong> Assessment process.<br />

AUDIT/05/10 Internal <strong>Audit</strong> Reports Visit 1 2009/2010<br />

Action: Clerk to <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

The internal auditors presented <strong>the</strong>ir internal audit reports as detailed below:<br />

• Human Resources<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered <strong>the</strong> internal auditors’ advisory report and noted<br />

that 7 recommendations for improvement had been made which had all been<br />

agreed with <strong>College</strong> management. It was noted that as <strong>the</strong> report was<br />

advisory <strong>the</strong> auditors had not provided an overall opinion. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> did note that <strong>the</strong> auditors noted that <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> did have policies<br />

and procedures in place for dealing with key aspects <strong>of</strong> personnel<br />

management.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> discussed with <strong>the</strong> internal auditors <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s approach to<br />

Human Resource Strategy and noted that a Strategy would be produced by<br />

August 2010 and would be taken to <strong>the</strong> Resources <strong>Committee</strong>.<br />

Action: Vice Principal Resources<br />

It was resolved that <strong>the</strong> report be recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Corporation for approval.<br />

• Learner Number Systems and Funding Claims<br />

Action: Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered <strong>the</strong> internal auditors’ report into Learner Number<br />

Systems and Funding Claims and were pleased to note that it was <strong>the</strong><br />

auditors’ opinion that <strong>the</strong> Corporation can take substantial assurance that<br />

<strong>the</strong> controls upon which <strong>the</strong> organisation relies on to manage this area , as<br />

currently laid down and operated, are effective.<br />

It was noted that <strong>the</strong>re was 1 recommendation that merited attention.<br />

After due consideration and discussion it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> report be<br />

recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation for approval.<br />

• Payroll<br />

Action: Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered <strong>the</strong> internal auditors’ report into <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s<br />

Payroll – Key Controls and were pleased to note that it was <strong>the</strong> auditor’s<br />

opinion that <strong>the</strong> Corporation can take substantial assurance that <strong>the</strong> controls<br />

upon which <strong>the</strong> organisation relies to manage this area, as currently laid<br />

down and operated, are effective.<br />

It was noted that <strong>the</strong>re were no recommendations were made in <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

It was resolved that <strong>the</strong> report be recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Corporation for approval.<br />

Action: Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

C2.4.3/JBW/ML/04.05.2010 Version 3


3<br />

Minute No.<br />

• Cash Controls and Collection<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered <strong>the</strong> internal auditors’ report into Cash Controls<br />

and Collection and were pleased to note that it was <strong>the</strong> auditors’ opinion that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Corporation can take substantial assurance that <strong>the</strong> controls upon which<br />

<strong>the</strong> organisation relies to manage this area, as currently laid down and<br />

operated, are effective.<br />

It was noted that <strong>the</strong>re was 1 recommendation that merited attention.<br />

After discussion it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> report be recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation for approval.<br />

• Corporate Planning Framework<br />

Action: Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered <strong>the</strong> internal auditors’ report into <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s<br />

Corporate planning Framework and were pleased to note that it was <strong>the</strong><br />

auditors’ opinion that <strong>the</strong> Corporation can take substantial assurance that<br />

<strong>the</strong> controls on which <strong>the</strong> organisation relies to manage this area, as currently<br />

laid down and operated, are effective.<br />

It was noted that <strong>the</strong>re were no recommendations made in <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

After discussion it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> report be recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation for approval.<br />

Action: Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

AUDIT/06/10<br />

Internal <strong>Audit</strong> Progress Report<br />

The internal auditors presented <strong>the</strong>ir progress report which summarised <strong>the</strong><br />

outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work completed to date against <strong>the</strong> annual internal audit plan<br />

for 2008/2009 toge<strong>the</strong>r with data in support <strong>of</strong> internal audit performance.<br />

The report covered <strong>the</strong> following aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> auditors’ work:<br />

• Final reports issued<br />

• Key findings from internal audit work<br />

• Work in progress or planned<br />

• Liaison with management and external audit<br />

• Changes to <strong>the</strong> Plan.<br />

• Sector guidance<br />

• 2009/2010 audit planning<br />

After due consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report it was resolved that it be received and<br />

noted.<br />

AUDIT/07/10<br />

Joint <strong>Audit</strong> Code <strong>of</strong> Practice<br />

The Vice Principal Corporate Planning presented a report which advised <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> consultation document relating to Part 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Joint <strong>Audit</strong><br />

Code <strong>of</strong> Practice.<br />

After due consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report it was resolved that it be noted.<br />

C2.4.3/JBW/ML/04.05.2010 Version 3


4<br />

Minute No.<br />

AUDIT/08/10<br />

Fraud Response Procedure<br />

The Vice Principal Corporate Planning presented a report which enabled <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> to review <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s Fraud Response Procedure.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> noted that <strong>the</strong>re were no proposed changes to <strong>the</strong> procedure<br />

and that it had not been required to use <strong>the</strong> procedure in <strong>the</strong> last eighteen<br />

months.<br />

After due consideration it was unanimously resolved that <strong>the</strong> procedure,<br />

subject to a number <strong>of</strong> minor textual changes, be recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation for approval.<br />

Action: Vice Principal/Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

AUDIT/09/10 Review <strong>of</strong> Policy for Additional Work Undertaken by <strong>College</strong> <strong>Audit</strong>ors –<br />

April 2010<br />

The Vice Principal Corporate Planning presented a report which enabled <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> to review <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s Policy for Additional Work Undertaken by<br />

<strong>College</strong> <strong>Audit</strong>ors.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> noted that <strong>the</strong>re were no proposed changes to <strong>the</strong> Policy and<br />

after due consideration it was unanimously resolved that <strong>the</strong> Policy be<br />

recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation for approval.<br />

Action: Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

AUDIT/10/10<br />

Value for Money Strategy Review<br />

The Vice Principal Corporate Planning presented a report which enabled <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> to review <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s Value for Money Strategy.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> noted that, o<strong>the</strong>r than a number <strong>of</strong> minor amendments, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

were no proposed changes to <strong>the</strong> Strategy and after due consideration <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> resolved that <strong>the</strong> Strategy as detailed in <strong>the</strong> Vice Principal’s report<br />

be recommended to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation for approval.<br />

Action: Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation<br />

AUDIT/11/10<br />

Procurement Strategy<br />

The Vice Principal Corporate Planning presented a report which made<br />

proposals for a Procurement Strategy.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> discussed <strong>the</strong> proposals in detail and after due consideration<br />

<strong>the</strong> Vice Principal agreed to review <strong>the</strong> Welsh Procurement Initiative which<br />

was presented as a possible source <strong>of</strong> good practice. The strategy will be<br />

updated and reported back to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> at its next meeting if <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

any relevant, beneficial changes to be made.<br />

AUDIT/12/10 Risk Management Update – April 2010<br />

Action: Vice Principal<br />

The Vice Principal Corporate Planning presented a report which provided <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> with a brief overview <strong>of</strong> risk management across <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>.<br />

C2.4.3/JBW/ML/04.05.2010 Version 3


5<br />

Minute No.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> discussed in detail how risk management is embedded and<br />

practically implemented at all levels across <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>. The <strong>Committee</strong> also<br />

thanked Chris Humm for his <strong>of</strong>fer to meet with <strong>the</strong> Vice Principal prior to <strong>the</strong><br />

next <strong>Committee</strong> meeting in order to discuss <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s approach to and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> risk management.<br />

After due discussion it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> report be noted.<br />

AUDIT/13/10 Extension to Contracts for Cleaning and Security - April 2010<br />

Action: Chris Humm<br />

The Vice Principal presented a report which made proposals for <strong>the</strong><br />

extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s Cleaning and Security Contracts for a maximum<br />

period <strong>of</strong> six months, ending July 2010.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered in detail <strong>the</strong> reasons for <strong>the</strong> extension and after<br />

due discussion it was unanimously approved that both services be extended<br />

for a maximum period <strong>of</strong> six months.<br />

AUDIT/14/10 Safeguarding Children and Young people – April 2010<br />

Action: Vice Principal<br />

The Vice Principal Corporate Planning presented a report that informed <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s auditors’ response to <strong>the</strong> DCSF guidance in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> Safeguarding Children and Young People.<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> considered and discussed <strong>the</strong> matter in detail and after due<br />

consideration resolved that <strong>the</strong>y agreed with <strong>the</strong> Executive Leadership<br />

Team’s management conclusions concerning <strong>the</strong> matter, namely that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

should be no requirement for auditors to be CRB checked whilst undertaking<br />

normal audit activities. However a risk assessment for visitors to <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

should be undertaken. This will be co-ordinated by <strong>the</strong> HR team.<br />

It was agreed that <strong>the</strong> Vice Principal Corporate Planning would formally write<br />

to <strong>the</strong> auditors (both internal and external) to advise <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong> ELT’s<br />

conclusions.<br />

After due discussion it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> report be noted.<br />

Action: Vice Principal<br />

AUDIT/15/10<br />

FMCE Submissions to <strong>the</strong> LSC<br />

The <strong>Committee</strong> noted that <strong>the</strong> LSC had recently written to <strong>the</strong> Principal<br />

concurring with <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>’s self assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> financial and<br />

management controls as “Good”.<br />

The Vice Principal reminded <strong>the</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> background and history<br />

relating to <strong>the</strong> assessment and <strong>the</strong> three year financial forecast. After due<br />

consideration it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> LSC’s communication be noted.<br />

C2.4.3/JBW/ML/04.05.2010 Version 3


6<br />

Minute No.<br />

AUDIT/16/10<br />

Monitoring <strong>the</strong> Implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Audit</strong> Recommendations by <strong>College</strong><br />

Management 2008-2009<br />

The Clerk to <strong>the</strong> Corporation presented a report which detailed <strong>the</strong><br />

management actions that had been taken arising from internal audit reports<br />

in 2008-2009.<br />

It was noted that all <strong>the</strong> outstanding management actions for 2008/2009 had<br />

now been completed.<br />

AUDIT/17/10<br />

Any O<strong>the</strong>r Business<br />

There were no matters raised under any o<strong>the</strong>r business.<br />

AUDIT/18/10<br />

Date <strong>of</strong> Next <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

It was agreed that <strong>the</strong> next meeting would be held at 5.00 pm on Wednesday<br />

30 June at <strong>the</strong> Altrincham Centre.<br />

The meeting closed at 6.37 pm.<br />

[Muir Miller left <strong>the</strong> meeting at 6.15 pm after <strong>the</strong> consideration <strong>of</strong> agenda item<br />

12.]<br />

[Gail Haworth left <strong>the</strong> meeting at 5.23 pm during <strong>the</strong> consideration <strong>of</strong> agenda<br />

item 5.]<br />

[Angela Brooks left <strong>the</strong> meeting at 5.30 pm during <strong>the</strong> consideration <strong>of</strong><br />

agenda item 5.]<br />

C2.4.3/JBW/ML/04.05.2010 Version 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!