01.02.2014 Views

to view the program - Society for Public Health Education

to view the program - Society for Public Health Education

to view the program - Society for Public Health Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

courses of action (Kozel, Kane, Rogers, & Hammes, 1995). This<br />

approach fosters a shared vision, alternative solutions and strategies<br />

<strong>for</strong> influencing pre-decision systems, and increasing media salience<br />

<strong>for</strong> “sustained” action. The bi-national interdisciplinary research team<br />

examined agenda-setting processes and how <strong>the</strong> health agenda in <strong>the</strong><br />

Paso del Norte Region is determined. Using quantitative and qualitative<br />

data collection, <strong>the</strong> research focused on identifying deficiencies in<br />

<strong>the</strong> border area’s public health systems, infrastructure and channels <strong>for</strong><br />

working <strong>to</strong>ward <strong>the</strong> bi-national objectives in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Health</strong>y Border 2010<br />

initiative (U.S.-Mexico Border <strong>Health</strong> Commission, 2003). Studying<br />

HPA-S in applied locations enhances <strong>the</strong> evidence basis <strong>for</strong> health<br />

promotion researchers and practitioners <strong>for</strong> ways <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>to</strong> improve<br />

health promotion leadership, advocacy, and policy development within<br />

regions where cultures, systems and economies are complex and<br />

interrelated. Key words: Agenda-setting processes and systems, health<br />

education practice, leadership, advocacy, policy development, health<br />

disparities Acknowledgements The project described was supported<br />

by a grant from <strong>the</strong> Paso del Norte <strong>Health</strong> Foundation, <strong>the</strong> Center<br />

<strong>for</strong> Border <strong>Health</strong> Research. Its contents are solely <strong>the</strong> responsibility<br />

of <strong>the</strong> authors and do not necessary represent <strong>the</strong> official <strong>view</strong>s of <strong>the</strong><br />

funding agency. In memoriam we recognize Drs. William M. Kane<br />

and Everett M. Rogers as grant collabora<strong>to</strong>rs, and men<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

31. Relationships between behavioral and motivational systems<br />

and physical activity, body composition and blood pressure<br />

Janeth Sanchez, MPH, Department of <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, New Mexico<br />

State University; Rebecca Palacios, New Mexico State University<br />

Background: The Behavioral Approach System (BAS) and <strong>the</strong><br />

Behavioral Inhibition Systems (BIS) are two learning motivational<br />

systems (Grey, 1981; Carver & White, 1994) that have been used <strong>to</strong><br />

study and predict behavior and affect. Past studies have shown that<br />

individual differences in <strong>the</strong>se two systems are related <strong>to</strong> certain<br />

health risk behaviors. This study examined <strong>the</strong> relationship between<br />

trait motivational tendencies, Carver & White BIS and BAS survey<br />

(CWBB) and <strong>the</strong> behavior-specific motivational tendencies, Physical<br />

Activity-Specific BIS and BAS survey (PABB), <strong>to</strong> physical activity,<br />

body composition, and blood pressure among college students.<br />

Methodology: A <strong>to</strong>tal of 552 students enrolled at New Mexico State<br />

University were recruited <strong>to</strong> participate in an online survey. The survey<br />

consisted of <strong>the</strong> CWBB scales which contained four subscales (Drive,<br />

Reward, Punishment, and Impulsivity), <strong>the</strong> PABB scales with seven<br />

subscales (BAS: Reward, Impulsivity, Drive, Positive Emotion, and<br />

BIS: Punishment, Frustrative Non-Reward, and Negative Emotion),<br />

and <strong>the</strong> International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). A<br />

subsample of <strong>the</strong> participants also completed a body composition <strong>to</strong><br />

obtain % body fat, BMI, waist and hip circumference measurements,<br />

as well as assess blood pressure by obtaining sys<strong>to</strong>lic and dias<strong>to</strong>lic<br />

measurements. Results: Bivariate correlational analysis showed that<br />

PABB scales were significantly related <strong>to</strong> actual physical activity, body<br />

composition, and blood pressure, while <strong>the</strong> CWBB survey questions<br />

were not. Body composition measures <strong>for</strong> body fat, BMI, and waist <strong>to</strong><br />

hip ration were inversely related <strong>to</strong> physical activity BAS subscales(all<br />

r values < -.269, all p values < .05) and positively related <strong>to</strong> physical<br />

activity BIS subscales(all r values > .275, all p values < .05). Blood<br />

pressure was also inversely related <strong>to</strong> physical activity BAS subscales<br />

(all r values < -.293, all p values < .05) and positively related <strong>to</strong> physical<br />

activity BIS subscales (all r values < .354, all p values < .05). However,<br />

physical activity was positively related <strong>to</strong> physical activity BAS subscales<br />

(all r values > .157, all p values < .001) and inversely related <strong>to</strong><br />

physical activity BIS subscales (all r values < -.115, all p values < .01).<br />

Discussion: When compared with Carver & White BIS and BAS<br />

subscales, <strong>the</strong> Physical Activity-Specific subscales correlated stronger<br />

with motivational tendencies <strong>to</strong>wards physical activity and physical<br />

health. Understanding <strong>the</strong> individual differences in behavior-specific<br />

motivational tendencies among college students may assist in developing<br />

effective behavioral interventions <strong>for</strong> groups at risk <strong>for</strong> obesity and<br />

hypertension and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e should be analyzed fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

32. *Streng<strong>the</strong>ning our Evidence Based and our Approaches <strong>to</strong><br />

Publish <strong>Health</strong> Policy: Taking Advantage of <strong>Health</strong> Policy<br />

Theory and Practice<br />

Beth Stevenson, MPH, CDC, Diane Allensworth, PhD, CDC<br />

Background: With <strong>the</strong> increasing interest among public health<br />

educa<strong>to</strong>rs in using policy, systems, and environmental approaches <strong>to</strong><br />

impact health, respectable strides have been made in learning how <strong>to</strong><br />

creatively identify potential policy interventions and in developing<br />

a research base <strong>to</strong> measure <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong>se interventions.<br />

Theoretical Basis: As our field moves <strong>to</strong> embrace policy interventions,<br />

many public health educa<strong>to</strong>rs are finding <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> developing new<br />

skills and identifying new <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>to</strong> not just develop policy, but <strong>to</strong> have<br />

a realistic understanding of what it will take <strong>to</strong> 1) make an evidencebased<br />

decision on policy options, 2) successfully implement a new<br />

health policy and 3) define how we can determine an expanded set of<br />

criteria <strong>for</strong> measuring our success. Methods: This presentation explores<br />

<strong>the</strong> challenges and <strong>the</strong> opportunities <strong>for</strong> health educa<strong>to</strong>rs as we move<br />

from <strong>program</strong>matic <strong>to</strong> policy interventions. Using current literature<br />

re<strong>view</strong>s on health policy approaches, key in<strong>for</strong>mant inter<strong>view</strong>s with<br />

health policy experts, and inter<strong>view</strong>s with practitioners in both health<br />

education and health policy this presentation will share <strong>the</strong> results of<br />

<strong>the</strong> latest policy <strong>the</strong>orists and <strong>the</strong> latest practitioner <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>for</strong> determining<br />

best approaches <strong>for</strong> determining and implementing evidence<br />

based health policy. By <strong>the</strong> end of this presentation, attendees will be<br />

able <strong>to</strong>: 1. Describe <strong>the</strong> basis of policy analysis and policy evaluation<br />

with an understanding of <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>for</strong> increasing our public health<br />

54<br />

SOPHE-NACDD 2011 Joint Academy and Midyear Scientific Meeting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!