to view the program - Society for Public Health Education

to view the program - Society for Public Health Education to view the program - Society for Public Health Education

01.02.2014 Views

Commission, the Department of State Health Services, the Workforce Solutions Upper Rio Grande, and others. At the state level, Proyecto HEART actions are aligned with others engaged in making similar efforts such as participation in a CHW employer forum that looked at four arenas: Policy/Awareness, Workforce Development, Evidence/ Research, and Special Populations. Nationally, Proyecto HEART researchers play an active role in the CHW Section of the American Public Health Association and participate in other national CHW workforce development activities. Proyecto HEART’s policy aims are complemented by current health care reform efforts that express the importance of employing CHWs and a social justice approach to promoting health The Role of the CHWs Within the Proyecto HEART Rafaela Gonzalez, CHW, University of Texas at El Paso HEART Project; Aurora Aguirre Polanco, BS, Department of Public Health; Lee Rosenthal MPH, PhD, University of Texas at El Paso; Hector Balcazar, PhD, MS, University of Texas School of Public Health, El Paso Regional Campus; Sherrie B. Wise, MS, University of Texas School of Public Health, El Paso Regional Campus; Maria Duarte, PhD, MS, Health Promotion, University of Texas at El Paso Proyecto HEART: integrating CHWs into an Ecological Approach to Wellness in El Paso, Texas The role of the CHWs within the Proyecto HEART. Maria Rafaela Gonzalez, CHW, E. Lee Rosenthal, Aurora Aguirre Polanco, Sherry Wise, Maria Duarte, Hector Balcazar. The Community Health Workers (CHWs) in the Proyecto HEART, a National Institutes of Health funded Community-based Participatory Research study in El Paso, promote the participation of the community in various wellness activities including physical fitness activities. The activities within the Proyecto HEART are based on the Social Cognitive Theory and Social Ecological Model. The roles of the CHWs in Proyecto HEART are: participant recruitment, enrollment, intake documentation, and tracking. Additonally, a cornerstone of the CHW role in this research study is health education and physical activity programming as a part of the “Mi Corazon- Mi Comunidad” (MiC-MiC) curriculum. The CHWs build a working environment of trustworthiness to better understand the health needs of the participants and community overall. They work to motivate participants and help reinforce and model strategies for a healthy heart lifestyle. CHWs represent the change agents that facilitate the connection among individuals, agencies, and HEART project partners. The effectiveness of the CHWs model can be evaluated by observing the impact of their service on multiple levels: the individual participant, interpersonal, and organizational level, among others. At the participant level, CHWs support individuals’ health improvements through leading such activities as the walking groups, swimming, and Latin dance aerobics in the park. CHWs observe that by understanding the benefits of exercising and eating healthy, participants feel more prepared to deal with current and future health issues. At the interpersonal level, individuals share program information and activities with their family and friends and ideally begin to work together to promote family and community health. At the organizational level, partner agencies such as the local branch of the YWCA, local Parks and Recreation centers, and other participant institutions, participate through integrating CHW led activities into their daily programming. CHWs also help create client navigation services creating greater culturally competent access to physical fitness and related programming. HEART CHWs themselves foresee structural changes in the community. A goal of HEART is that individuals served are better able to mobilize resources at the interpersonal and agency level contributing to better health and access to a heart healthy environment for Hispanics in the Lower Valley of El Paso, Texas. Concurrent Session A2 Improving and Evaluating Capacity for Change Building Capacity in Local Public Health to Make Policy, Systems, and Environmental Changes to Prevent Chronic Disease Paj Nandi, MPH, Washington State Department of Health; Marilyn Sitaker, MPH, Washington State Department of Health; Michael Boysun, MPH, Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, Washington State Department of Health As part of the evaluation for the Washington state Healthy Communities Program, we are specifically looking at development of local health department capacity to do policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change work. Because this program was a pilot approach to capacity development in low-capacity counties, the evaluation not only explored how local capacity for PSE change developed over time but also how the quality of the program could be improved for the next cohort of Healthy Communities county teams. In this presentation, we describe the over-arching evaluation plan and approach to assessing and tracking capacity building and quality improvement process. This includes a baseline assessment of competencies as defined through the Directors of Health Promotion and Education. We then discuss the specific data collection methods, rationale, and metrics collected throughout the year. We include a discussion on the challenges and encountered and solutions in evaluating capacity in low-capacity counties. Finally, we share the results and findings of the data analyzed plus the quality improvement findings used to shape the new round of capacity development Healthy Communities county health department teams. 20 SOPHE-NACDD 2011 Joint Academy and Midyear Scientific Meeting

Evaluating Capacity Building in Local Healthy Communities Projects to Achieve Policy, Systems, and Environmental Changes Mike Boysun, MPH, Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, Washington State Department of Health Abstract for the HC Policy Tracking system As part of the evaluation for the Washington state Healthy Communities Program, we are specifically looking at development of local health department capacity to do policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change work. Because this program was a pilot approach to capacity development in low-capacity counties, the evaluation not only explored how local capacity for PSE change developed over time but also how the quality of the program could be improved for the next cohort of Healthy Communities county teams. In this presentation, we describe the over-arching evaluation plan and approach to assessing and tracking capacity building and quality improvement process. This includes a baseline assessment of competencies as defined through the Directors of Health Promotion and Education. We then discuss the specific data collection methods, rationale, and metrics collected throughout the year. We include a discussion on the challenges and encountered and solutions in evaluating capacity in low-capacity counties. Finally, we share the results and findings of the data analyzed plus the quality improvement findings used to shape the new round of capacity development Healthy Communities county health department teams. Tracking Development of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Changes in Local Healthy Communities Projects Marilyn Sitaker, MPH, Washington State Department of Health Abstract for the HC Policy Tracking system Since 2003 the WA-NPAO program has helped local communities implement the policy, systems and environmental (PSE) change strategies promoted in its CDC-funded State Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan. As Washington’s public health practitioners learned to adapt traditional program planning approaches to PSE work, they struggled to find ways to evaluate their progress. As we began our capacity-building Healthy Communities project, the Recommended Community Strategies and Measurements to Prevent Obesity in the United State helped us focus on those strategies that were likely to have the greatest impact. Strategies identified in the Communities Putting Prevention to Work grants showed us which PSE changes were being counted at the national level. Yet this solves only part of the evaluation puzzle. We found that identifying a theoretical model of policy development, enactment, implementation and impact was a critical step in creating a framework to evaluate PSE change work in local communities, and measure impact statewide. In this presentation, we briefly describe two theoretical policy models: the Stages of Policy Development framework, and the Multiple Streams Framework. We discuss how these models were used to develop, test and refine Washington’s policy tracking system. We describe the reporting tool used to collect progress in local policy development on a semi-annual basis, and provide definitions and examples of reported milestones across the stages of policy development. We show data that summarizes progress in policy development for each “MAPPS” strategy (media, access, point of purchase/promotion, pricing, social support) in Healthy Community projects statewide. Concurrent Session A3 Tobacco National Networks and Tribal Support Centers: Sharing Strategies, Lessons Learned, and Implications for Tobacco Control Efforts Tobacco National Networks and Tribal Support Centers: Promoting Policy, Systems, and Environment Change Kevin Collins, PhD, CDC Office on Smoking and Health; Kim Alford, BS, CHES, TTS, National Native Commercial Tobacco Abuse Prevention Network Background: National Tobacco Control Networks for Priority Populations have been funded since 2001 to provide leadership, expertise and promotion of policy-related initiatives (including environmental and systems change) and increase utilization of proven or potentially promising practices when available or appropriate. Successes and lessons learned from this initiative includes the development policies that restrict tobacco use, an increase in the participation of tobacco prevention efforts by underserved populations, and the development of population specific tools that communities can use in tobacco prevention efforts. These organizations are tasked to create and maintain the following networks: • African-American • American Indians/ Alaskan Natives • Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders • Hispanic/ Latino • Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgender • Low Socio-economic status Building upon efforts begun in 2000, CDC-OSH funded a second round of Tribal Support Centers in an attempt to identify and eliminate the tobacco-related disparities among AI/AN populations. The evaluation report provided findings and recommendations on the Tribal Support Centers for Tobacco initiative which was funded for five years (Oct 2005 to Sept 2010) . Theoretical basis: Networks are intended to be powerful mechanisms for sharing information and knowledge. They also promote communication and coordination to achieve sustainable development. Networks act as effective catalysts for building relationships and commitment among public and private stakeholders at the local, national, regional, and international levels. They help build trustful relationships as a basis for sharing information and knowledge, and serve as mutual learning and capacity – building mechanisms. Objectives: National Networks facilitate a process by which network participants will inform the tobacco prevention community about: the depth of industry targeting; the gaps in data used to describe the burden of tobacco; and strategies to implement SOPHE-NACDD 2011 Joint Academy and Midyear Scientific Meeting 21

Evaluating Capacity Building in Local <strong>Health</strong>y Communities<br />

Projects <strong>to</strong> Achieve Policy, Systems, and Environmental Changes<br />

Mike Boysun, MPH, Tobacco Prevention and Control Program,<br />

Washing<strong>to</strong>n State Department of <strong>Health</strong><br />

Abstract <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> HC Policy Tracking system As part of <strong>the</strong> evaluation<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Washing<strong>to</strong>n state <strong>Health</strong>y Communities Program, we<br />

are specifically looking at development of local health department<br />

capacity <strong>to</strong> do policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change work.<br />

Because this <strong>program</strong> was a pilot approach <strong>to</strong> capacity development<br />

in low-capacity counties, <strong>the</strong> evaluation not only explored how local<br />

capacity <strong>for</strong> PSE change developed over time but also how <strong>the</strong> quality<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>program</strong> could be improved <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> next cohort of <strong>Health</strong>y<br />

Communities county teams. In this presentation, we describe <strong>the</strong><br />

over-arching evaluation plan and approach <strong>to</strong> assessing and tracking<br />

capacity building and quality improvement process. This includes a<br />

baseline assessment of competencies as defined through <strong>the</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

of <strong>Health</strong> Promotion and <strong>Education</strong>. We <strong>the</strong>n discuss <strong>the</strong> specific<br />

data collection methods, rationale, and metrics collected throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> year. We include a discussion on <strong>the</strong> challenges and encountered<br />

and solutions in evaluating capacity in low-capacity counties. Finally,<br />

we share <strong>the</strong> results and findings of <strong>the</strong> data analyzed plus <strong>the</strong> quality<br />

improvement findings used <strong>to</strong> shape <strong>the</strong> new round of capacity development<br />

<strong>Health</strong>y Communities county health department teams.<br />

Tracking Development of Policy, Systems, and Environmental<br />

Changes in Local <strong>Health</strong>y Communities Projects<br />

Marilyn Sitaker, MPH, Washing<strong>to</strong>n State Department of <strong>Health</strong><br />

Abstract <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> HC Policy Tracking system Since 2003 <strong>the</strong><br />

WA-NPAO <strong>program</strong> has helped local communities implement <strong>the</strong><br />

policy, systems and environmental (PSE) change strategies promoted<br />

in its CDC-funded State Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan. As<br />

Washing<strong>to</strong>n’s public health practitioners learned <strong>to</strong> adapt traditional<br />

<strong>program</strong> planning approaches <strong>to</strong> PSE work, <strong>the</strong>y struggled <strong>to</strong> find<br />

ways <strong>to</strong> evaluate <strong>the</strong>ir progress. As we began our capacity-building<br />

<strong>Health</strong>y Communities project, <strong>the</strong> Recommended Community<br />

Strategies and Measurements <strong>to</strong> Prevent Obesity in <strong>the</strong> United State<br />

helped us focus on those strategies that were likely <strong>to</strong> have <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

impact. Strategies identified in <strong>the</strong> Communities Putting Prevention<br />

<strong>to</strong> Work<br />

grants showed us which PSE changes were being counted at <strong>the</strong><br />

national level. Yet this solves only part of <strong>the</strong> evaluation puzzle. We<br />

found that identifying a <strong>the</strong>oretical model of policy development,<br />

enactment, implementation and impact was a critical step in creating<br />

a framework <strong>to</strong> evaluate PSE change work in local communities, and<br />

measure impact statewide. In this presentation, we briefly describe<br />

two <strong>the</strong>oretical policy models: <strong>the</strong> Stages of Policy Development<br />

framework, and <strong>the</strong> Multiple Streams Framework. We discuss how<br />

<strong>the</strong>se models were used <strong>to</strong> develop, test and refine Washing<strong>to</strong>n’s policy<br />

tracking system. We describe <strong>the</strong> reporting <strong>to</strong>ol used <strong>to</strong> collect progress<br />

in local policy development on a semi-annual basis, and provide<br />

definitions and examples of reported miles<strong>to</strong>nes across <strong>the</strong> stages of<br />

policy development. We show data that summarizes progress in policy<br />

development <strong>for</strong> each “MAPPS” strategy (media, access, point of<br />

purchase/promotion, pricing, social support) in <strong>Health</strong>y Community<br />

projects statewide.<br />

Concurrent Session A3<br />

Tobacco National Networks and Tribal<br />

Support Centers: Sharing Strategies,<br />

Lessons Learned, and Implications <strong>for</strong><br />

Tobacco Control Ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

Tobacco National Networks and Tribal Support Centers: Promoting<br />

Policy, Systems, and Environment Change<br />

Kevin Collins, PhD, CDC Office on Smoking and <strong>Health</strong>; Kim<br />

Al<strong>for</strong>d, BS, CHES, TTS, National Native Commercial Tobacco Abuse<br />

Prevention Network<br />

Background: National Tobacco Control Networks <strong>for</strong> Priority<br />

Populations have been funded since 2001 <strong>to</strong> provide leadership, expertise<br />

and promotion of policy-related initiatives (including environmental<br />

and systems change) and increase utilization of proven or potentially<br />

promising practices when available or appropriate. Successes and<br />

lessons learned from this initiative includes <strong>the</strong> development policies<br />

that restrict <strong>to</strong>bacco use, an increase in <strong>the</strong> participation of <strong>to</strong>bacco<br />

prevention ef<strong>for</strong>ts by underserved populations, and <strong>the</strong> development of<br />

population specific <strong>to</strong>ols that communities can use in <strong>to</strong>bacco prevention<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts. These organizations are tasked <strong>to</strong> create and maintain<br />

<strong>the</strong> following networks: • African-American • American Indians/<br />

Alaskan Natives • Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders • Hispanic/<br />

Latino • Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgender • Low Socio-economic<br />

status Building upon ef<strong>for</strong>ts begun in 2000, CDC-OSH funded a<br />

second round of Tribal Support Centers in an attempt <strong>to</strong> identify and<br />

eliminate <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>bacco-related disparities among AI/AN populations.<br />

The evaluation report provided findings and recommendations on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Tribal Support Centers <strong>for</strong> Tobacco initiative which was funded<br />

<strong>for</strong> five years (Oct 2005 <strong>to</strong> Sept 2010) . Theoretical basis: Networks<br />

are intended <strong>to</strong> be powerful mechanisms <strong>for</strong> sharing in<strong>for</strong>mation and<br />

knowledge. They also promote communication and coordination <strong>to</strong><br />

achieve sustainable development. Networks act as effective catalysts<br />

<strong>for</strong> building relationships and commitment among public and private<br />

stakeholders at <strong>the</strong> local, national, regional, and international levels.<br />

They help build trustful relationships as a basis <strong>for</strong> sharing in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

and knowledge, and serve as mutual learning and capacity – building<br />

mechanisms. Objectives: National Networks facilitate a process<br />

by which network participants will in<strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>bacco prevention<br />

community about: <strong>the</strong> depth of industry targeting; <strong>the</strong> gaps in data<br />

used <strong>to</strong> describe <strong>the</strong> burden of <strong>to</strong>bacco; and strategies <strong>to</strong> implement<br />

SOPHE-NACDD 2011 Joint Academy and Midyear Scientific Meeting 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!