Review of 2006 Ten-Year Site Plans - Public Service Commission
Review of 2006 Ten-Year Site Plans - Public Service Commission
Review of 2006 Ten-Year Site Plans - Public Service Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
South Florida Water Management District. Has no adverse comments regarding the proposed<br />
sites discussed in FPL’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan.<br />
Brevard County Board <strong>of</strong> County <strong>Commission</strong>ers. The FPL plan for generator additions for<br />
the Cape Canaveral Plant should be consistent with local zoning regulation and growth management<br />
policies. Possible impacts <strong>of</strong> water discharges into the adjacent Indian River Lagoon are a concern.<br />
Gulf Power Company<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection.<br />
planning purposes.<br />
GULF’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan is adequate for<br />
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation <strong>Commission</strong>. GULF’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan is suitable<br />
for planning purposes.<br />
Apalachee Regional Planning Council. GULF’s potential plans for capacity addition to the<br />
Sholz Plant <strong>Site</strong> in Jackson County should be consistent with local zoning regulation, growth<br />
management policies, and environmental regulation.<br />
West Florida Regional Planning Council. GULF’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan is consistent with the<br />
West Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan.<br />
The County <strong>of</strong> Escambia. GULF’s proposed project, located in Escambia County, should be<br />
consistent with the Escambia County Land Development Code.<br />
JEA<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection. JEA’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan is adequate for planning<br />
purposes.<br />
North Central Florida Regional Planning Council. No comment on JEA’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan.<br />
North Florida Regional Council. JEA’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan contained ample forecasting.<br />
Council supports efforts to reduce reliance on coal and oil as well as efforts to increase energy<br />
conservation activities and develop clean alternative energy alternatives.<br />
Orlando Utilities <strong>Commission</strong><br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection. OUC’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan is adequate for planning<br />
purposes.<br />
South Florida Water Management District. No adverse comments regarding the proposed<br />
sites discussed in OUC’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan.<br />
Orange County. OUC’s <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> Plan does not appear to indicate any inconsistencies<br />
with Orange County’s Growth Management policies at this time.<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> 2007 <strong>Ten</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Site</strong> <strong>Plans</strong> 40
Change language