After the Interregnum - David Chandler

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Monbiot, G. (2003) ‘Rattling the Bars’, Guardian, 18 November. Neumann, I. B. (2004) ‘Beware of Organicism: The Narrative Self of the State’, Review of International Studies, Vol.30, No.2, pp.259-267. Onuf, N. G. (1991) ‘Sovereignty: Outline of a Conceptual History’, Alternatives, Vol.16, pp.425-446. Palan, R. (2000) ‘A World of their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, Vol.26, pp.575- 598. Rabkin, J. (1999) ‘Nuremberg Misremembered’, John Hopkins SAIS Review, Summer-Fall, pp.223-239. Robertson, G. (1999) Crimes against Humanity: the Struggle for Global Justice (London: Allen Lane/ Penguin Press). Rosenberg, J. (1994) The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations (London: Verso). Smith, S. (2001) ‘Reflectivist and Constructivist Approaches to International Theory’, in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (2 nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Solana, J. (2003) EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, A Secure Europe in a Better World (European Council, Thessaloniki, 20 June). Available: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/sep/solanasec.pdf Suganami, H. (1986) ‘Reflections on the Domestic Analogy: the Case of Bull, Beitz and Linklater’, Review of International Studies, Vol.12, pp.145-158. Walker R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). 28
Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, Vol.46, No.2, pp.391-425. Wheeler, N. J. and Bellamy, A. J. (2001) ‘Humanitarian Intervention and World Politics’, in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (2 nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions (London: Continuum). Notes 1 For textbook attempts to apply these see, for example, Jackson and Sørenson (2003), pp.139-174. 2 This is highlighted by the concluding chapter to Global Civil Society: An Answer to War?, titled: ‘September 11: The Return of the “Outside”’. 3 See, for example, Justin Rosenberg’s The Empire of Civil Society (1994). 4 This point is well drawn out in Rob Walker’s Inside/Outside (1994). 5 As Hedly Bull noted even if, in a highly unlikely scenario, the states of the European Union completely gave up their national sovereignty the consequences would merely be the creation of a larger nation-state (1995:255). 6 This is why the question of whether the state is a ‘person’ is not answerable as a question of sociology or psychology, despite the recent attempts of International Relations theorists to try. See for example P. T. Jackson et al (2004). 7 I’m grateful to Professor A. J. R. Groom for pointing out in discussion that the post- 1945 era was a ‘blip’ rather than the norm, at the 2001 International Studies Association Convention held in Hong Kong. 29
Page 1 and 2: Paper presented to the Centre for D
Page 3 and 4: sphere was understood as a politica
Page 5 and 6: different needs, is either lazy or
Page 7 and 8: international sphere is no longer c
Page 9 and 10: assumption is that the dichotomy be
Page 11 and 12: heart of the discipline of Internat
Page 13 and 14: Constructivist approaches often cla
Page 15 and 16: seem clear that the rights of the
Page 17 and 18: eturning to the pre-political era o
Page 19 and 20: formalised political and legal equa
Page 21 and 22: with through global civil society a
Page 23 and 24: their loyalties to the invisible po
Page 25 and 26: Bain, W. (2003) Between Anarchy and
Page 27: ICISS (2001) International Commissi

After the Interregnum - David Chandler

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?