Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover Die ontogenetische ...
Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover Die ontogenetische ... Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover Die ontogenetische ...
Studie II: Shift of the CoM in growing dogs Table 3: Mean load distribution (mean ± s.d. in %BW) between the fore- and the hindlimbs of all dogs at the different ages. PW PFz MFz IFz FL HL FL HL FL HL 11 59.2 ± 1.7 a 40.8 ± 1.7 a 61.7 ± 5.0 38.3 ± 5.0 62.4 ± 4.7 a 37.6 ± 4.7 a 13 60.6 ± 1.8 b 39.4 ± 1.8 b 61.6 ± 0.8 38.4 ± 0.8 63.0 ± 1.0 b 37.0 ± 1.0 b 19 61.8 ± 2.2 38.2 ± 2.2 61.1 ± 1.8 38.9 ± 1.8 62.5 ± 1.2 c 37.5 ± 1.2 c * 22 61.7 ± 1.9 38.3 ± 1.9 61.3 ± 1.8 38.7 ± 1.8 63.3 ± 1.2 d 36.7 ± 1.2 d 26 62.8 ± 2.4 a 37.2 ± 2.4 a 62.6 ± 2.1 37.4 ± 2.1 65.8 ± 1.4 34.2 ± 1.4 30 63.1 ± 2.9 a,b 36.9 ± 2.9 a 62.5 ± 2.7 37.5 ± 2.7 66.0 ± 1.6 34.0 ± 1.6 43 63.7 ± 2.1 a,b 36.3 ± 2.1 a,b 63.6 ± 1.6 36.4 ± 1.6 67.4 ± 0.8 a,b,c,d 32.6 ± 0.8 a,b,c,d 51 62.9 ± 1.9 a 37.1 ± 1.9 a 63.3 ± 2.0 36.7 ± 2.0 66.5 ± 0.7 a,c 33.6 ± 0.7 a,c *Note that two individuals were measured at PW20. For abbreviations, see Table 1. For explanation of the subscripts, see Table 2. Table 4: Time to peak force (mean ± s.d. in % of stance duration) of the fore- and hindlimbs and thorax-to-abdomen ratio (mean ± s.d.) for all dogs at the different ages. PW FL HL Th/Ab 11 47.7 ± 4.1 39.8 ± 3.3 a 1.09 ± 0.06 a 13 44.8 ± 4.8 41.8 ± 2.6 b 1.07 ± 0.04 b 19* 42.4 ± 2.2 44.6 ± 2.9 a 1.13 ± 0.05 c 22 44.5 ± 2.4 45.6 ± 2.5 a 1.21 ± 0.05 a,b,d 26 45.3 ± 2.2 46.7 ± 2.8 a,b 1.21 ± 0.06 a,b,e 30 45.5 ± 2.1 45.3 ± 1.1 a 1.28 ± 0.06 a,b,c 43 44.7 ± 1.7 46.5 ± 2.1 a,b 1.31 ± 0.05 a,b,c,d,e 51 46.4 ± 1.3 46.2 ± 0.9 a,b 1.27 ± 0.05 a,b,c *Note that two individuals were measured at PW20. For abbreviations, see Table 1; Th, thorax; Ab, abdomen. For explanation of the subscripts, see Table 2. 70
Studie II: Shift of the CoM in growing dogs Supplementary data Tab. S1: Vertical force parameters (mean ± s.d. in %BW) for all dogs at the different ages. PW PFz MFz IFz FL HL FL HL FL HL 11 101.0 ± 7.0 69.9 ± 7.1 59.7 ± 7.6 36.8 ± 3.5 12.1 ± 1.8 7.2 ± 0.5 13 107.1 ± 6.4 69.7 ± 4.3 59.6 ± 3.2 37.2 ± 2.2 12.8 ± 0.8 7.5 ± 0.7 19* 114.1 ± 3.1 70.7 ± 5.7 60.8 ± 1.6 38.8 ± 2.7 13.9 ± 0.8 8.3 ± 0.5 22 118.0 ± 6.4 73.2 ± 4.6 62.1 ± 2.6 39.2 ± 2.1 14.4 ± 0.7 8.3 ± 0.5 26 124.1 ± 5.8 73.7 ± 5.7 64.6 ± 2.9 38.6 ± 2.1 14.1 ± 0.5 7.3 ± 0.4 30 127.4 ± 4.7 75.0 ± 9.0 65.3 ± 2.1 39.2 ± 3.9 14.1 ± 0.4 7.3 ± 0.5 43 125.9 ± 3.4 71.9 ± 5.6 65.7 ± 1.6 37.6 ± 1.9 14.2 ± 0.7 6.9 ± 0.3 51 124.4 ± 5.3 73.3 ± 4.8 64.6 ± 1.6 37.5 ± 2.7 13.5 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 0.3 *Note that two individuals were measured at PW20. Abbreviations: PFz, peak vertical force; MFz, mean vertical force; IFz, vertical impulse; FL, forelimb; HL, hindlimb; PW, postnatal week. 71
- Page 20 and 21: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 22 and 23: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 24 and 25: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 26 and 27: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 28 and 29: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 30 and 31: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 32 and 33: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 34 and 35: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 36 and 37: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 38 and 39: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 40 and 41: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 42 and 43: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 44 and 45: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 46 and 47: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 48 and 49: Studie I: Ontogenetic allometry of
- Page 50 and 51: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 52 and 53: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 54 and 55: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 56 and 57: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 58 and 59: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 60 and 61: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 62 and 63: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 64 and 65: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 66 and 67: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 68 and 69: Studie II: Shift of the CoM in grow
- Page 72 and 73: Diskussion 4. Diskussion In dieser
- Page 74 and 75: Diskussion während des Messzeitrau
- Page 76 and 77: Diskussion Die zunehmende kraniale
- Page 78 and 79: Zusammenfassung 5. Zusammenfassung
- Page 80 and 81: Summary 6. Summary Daniela Helmsmü
- Page 82 and 83: Literaturverzeichnis 7. Literaturve
- Page 84 and 85: Literaturverzeichnis CARRIER, D.R.,
- Page 86 and 87: Literaturverzeichnis FISCHER, M.S.,
- Page 88 and 89: Literaturverzeichnis HERZOG, W., B.
- Page 90 and 91: Literaturverzeichnis MAES, L.D., M.
- Page 92 and 93: Literaturverzeichnis ROTH, V.L. (19
- Page 94 and 95: Literaturverzeichnis SOKAL, R.R. u.
- Page 96 and 97: Literaturverzeichnis WITTE, T.H., K
Studie II: Shift of the CoM in growing dogs<br />
Supplementary data<br />
Tab. S1: Vertical force parameters (mean ± s.d. in %BW) for all dogs at the<br />
different ages.<br />
PW PFz MFz IFz<br />
FL HL FL HL FL HL<br />
11 101.0 ± 7.0 69.9 ± 7.1 59.7 ± 7.6 36.8 ± 3.5 12.1 ± 1.8 7.2 ± 0.5<br />
13 107.1 ± 6.4 69.7 ± 4.3 59.6 ± 3.2 37.2 ± 2.2 12.8 ± 0.8 7.5 ± 0.7<br />
19* 114.1 ± 3.1 70.7 ± 5.7 60.8 ± 1.6 38.8 ± 2.7 13.9 ± 0.8 8.3 ± 0.5<br />
22 118.0 ± 6.4 73.2 ± 4.6 62.1 ± 2.6 39.2 ± 2.1 14.4 ± 0.7 8.3 ± 0.5<br />
26 124.1 ± 5.8 73.7 ± 5.7 64.6 ± 2.9 38.6 ± 2.1 14.1 ± 0.5 7.3 ± 0.4<br />
30 127.4 ± 4.7 75.0 ± 9.0 65.3 ± 2.1 39.2 ± 3.9 14.1 ± 0.4 7.3 ± 0.5<br />
43 125.9 ± 3.4 71.9 ± 5.6 65.7 ± 1.6 37.6 ± 1.9 14.2 ± 0.7 6.9 ± 0.3<br />
51 124.4 ± 5.3 73.3 ± 4.8 64.6 ± 1.6 37.5 ± 2.7 13.5 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 0.3<br />
*Note that two individuals were measured at PW20.<br />
Abbreviations: PFz, peak vertical force; MFz, mean vertical force; IFz, vertical<br />
impulse; FL, forelimb; HL, hindlimb; PW, postnatal week.<br />
71
Change language