Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center
Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center
Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
slavemasters was apparent to many. Fearing this disruption<br />
of the concentration camp culture of the plantations-and<br />
fearing even more the dangers of arming<br />
masses of Afrikans-many settlers preferred to lose to<br />
their British kith and kin rather than tamper with slavery.<br />
But that choice was no longer fully theirs to make, as the<br />
genie was part-way out of the bottle.<br />
On Dec. 31, 1775, Gen. Washington ordered the<br />
enlistment of Afrikans into the Continental Army, with<br />
the promise of freedom at the end of the war. Many settlers<br />
sent their slaves into the army to take their place. One<br />
Hessian mercenary officer with the British said: "The<br />
Negro can take the field instead of the master; and<br />
therefore, no regiment is to be seen in which there are not<br />
Negroes in abundance ..." Over 5,000 Afrikans served in<br />
the Patriot military, making up a large proportion of the<br />
most experienced troops (settlers usually served for only<br />
short enlistments-90 days duty being the most common<br />
term-while slaves served until the war's end or death).(24)<br />
For oppressed peoples the price of the war was<br />
paid in blood. ~fiikancasualties were heavy (one-half of<br />
the Afrikans who served with the British in Virginia died in<br />
an epidemic).(25) And the Indian nations allied to the<br />
Crown suffered greatly as the tide of battle turned against<br />
their side. The same was true of many Afrikans captured in<br />
British defeats. Some were sold to the West Indies and<br />
others were executed. A similar heavy fate fell on those<br />
recaptured while making their way to British lines. The settler<br />
mass community organizations, such as the infamous<br />
"Committees of Correspondence" in New York and<br />
Massachusetts, played the same role up North that the<br />
Slave Patrols played in the South, of checking and arresting<br />
rebellious Afrikans.(26)<br />
Even those who had allied with the victorious settlers<br />
did not necessarily find themselves winning anything.<br />
Many Afrikans were disarmed and put back into chains at<br />
the war's end, despite solemn settler promises. John Hancock,<br />
President of the Continental Congress, may have<br />
presented Afrikan U.S. troops with a banner - which<br />
praised them as "The Bucks of America" - but that<br />
didn't help Afrikans such as Captain Mark Starlin. He was<br />
the first Afrikan captain in the Amerikan naval forces, and<br />
had won many honors for his near-suicidal night raids on<br />
the British fleet (which is why the settlers let him and his<br />
all-Afrikan crew sail alone). But as soon as the war ended,<br />
his master simply reclaimed him. Starlin spent the rest of<br />
his life as a slave. He, ironically enough, is known to<br />
historians as an exceptionally dedicated "patriot", superloyal<br />
to the new settler nation.(27)<br />
What was primary for the Afrikan masses was a<br />
strategic relationship with the British Empire against settler<br />
Amerika. To use an Old European power against the<br />
Euro-Amerikan settlers-who were the nearest and most<br />
immediate enemy-was just common sense to many.<br />
65,000 Afrikans joined the British forces-over ten for<br />
every one enlisted in the Continental U.S. ranks.(28) As<br />
Lenin said in discussing the national question: "The<br />
masses vote with their feet". And in this case they voted<br />
against Amerika.<br />
Secondarily, on an individual level Afrikans served<br />
with various forces in return for release from slavery.<br />
There was no real "political unity" or larger allegiance involved,<br />
just a quid pro quo. On the European sides as well,<br />
obviously. If the British and Patriot sides could have pursued<br />
their conflict without freeing any slaves or disrupting<br />
the slave system, they each gladly would have done so. Just<br />
as the slave enlistments in Bacon's Rebellion demonstrated<br />
only the temporary and tactical nature of alliances between<br />
oppressed and oppressor forces, so the alignment of forces<br />
in the settler War of Independence only proved that the national<br />
patriotic struggle of Euro-Amerikans was opposite<br />
to the basic interests and political desires of the oppressed.<br />
Even in the ruins of British defeat, the soundness<br />
of this viewpoint was born out in practice. While the<br />
jubilant Patriots watched the defeated British army<br />
evacuate New York City in 1783, some 4,000 Afrikans<br />
swarmed aboard the departing ships to escape Amerika.<br />
Another 4,000 Afrikans escaped with the British from<br />
Savannah, 6,000 from Charleston, and 5,000 escaped<br />
aboard British ships prior to the surrender. (29) Did these<br />
brothers and sisters "lose" the war-compared to those<br />
still in chains on the plantations?<br />
Others chose neither to leave nor submit. All during<br />
the war Indian and Afrikan guerrillas struck at the settlers.<br />
In one case, three hundred Afrikan ex-slaves fought<br />
an extended guerrilla campaign against the planters in both<br />
Georgia and South Carolina. Originally allied to the<br />
British forces, they continued their independent campaign<br />
long after the British defeat. They were not overcome until<br />
1786, when their secret fort at Bear Creek was discovered<br />
and overwhelmed. This was but one front in the true<br />
democratic struggle against Amerika.