28.01.2014 Views

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

slavemasters was apparent to many. Fearing this disruption<br />

of the concentration camp culture of the plantations-and<br />

fearing even more the dangers of arming<br />

masses of Afrikans-many settlers preferred to lose to<br />

their British kith and kin rather than tamper with slavery.<br />

But that choice was no longer fully theirs to make, as the<br />

genie was part-way out of the bottle.<br />

On Dec. 31, 1775, Gen. Washington ordered the<br />

enlistment of Afrikans into the Continental Army, with<br />

the promise of freedom at the end of the war. Many settlers<br />

sent their slaves into the army to take their place. One<br />

Hessian mercenary officer with the British said: "The<br />

Negro can take the field instead of the master; and<br />

therefore, no regiment is to be seen in which there are not<br />

Negroes in abundance ..." Over 5,000 Afrikans served in<br />

the Patriot military, making up a large proportion of the<br />

most experienced troops (settlers usually served for only<br />

short enlistments-90 days duty being the most common<br />

term-while slaves served until the war's end or death).(24)<br />

For oppressed peoples the price of the war was<br />

paid in blood. ~fiikancasualties were heavy (one-half of<br />

the Afrikans who served with the British in Virginia died in<br />

an epidemic).(25) And the Indian nations allied to the<br />

Crown suffered greatly as the tide of battle turned against<br />

their side. The same was true of many Afrikans captured in<br />

British defeats. Some were sold to the West Indies and<br />

others were executed. A similar heavy fate fell on those<br />

recaptured while making their way to British lines. The settler<br />

mass community organizations, such as the infamous<br />

"Committees of Correspondence" in New York and<br />

Massachusetts, played the same role up North that the<br />

Slave Patrols played in the South, of checking and arresting<br />

rebellious Afrikans.(26)<br />

Even those who had allied with the victorious settlers<br />

did not necessarily find themselves winning anything.<br />

Many Afrikans were disarmed and put back into chains at<br />

the war's end, despite solemn settler promises. John Hancock,<br />

President of the Continental Congress, may have<br />

presented Afrikan U.S. troops with a banner - which<br />

praised them as "The Bucks of America" - but that<br />

didn't help Afrikans such as Captain Mark Starlin. He was<br />

the first Afrikan captain in the Amerikan naval forces, and<br />

had won many honors for his near-suicidal night raids on<br />

the British fleet (which is why the settlers let him and his<br />

all-Afrikan crew sail alone). But as soon as the war ended,<br />

his master simply reclaimed him. Starlin spent the rest of<br />

his life as a slave. He, ironically enough, is known to<br />

historians as an exceptionally dedicated "patriot", superloyal<br />

to the new settler nation.(27)<br />

What was primary for the Afrikan masses was a<br />

strategic relationship with the British Empire against settler<br />

Amerika. To use an Old European power against the<br />

Euro-Amerikan settlers-who were the nearest and most<br />

immediate enemy-was just common sense to many.<br />

65,000 Afrikans joined the British forces-over ten for<br />

every one enlisted in the Continental U.S. ranks.(28) As<br />

Lenin said in discussing the national question: "The<br />

masses vote with their feet". And in this case they voted<br />

against Amerika.<br />

Secondarily, on an individual level Afrikans served<br />

with various forces in return for release from slavery.<br />

There was no real "political unity" or larger allegiance involved,<br />

just a quid pro quo. On the European sides as well,<br />

obviously. If the British and Patriot sides could have pursued<br />

their conflict without freeing any slaves or disrupting<br />

the slave system, they each gladly would have done so. Just<br />

as the slave enlistments in Bacon's Rebellion demonstrated<br />

only the temporary and tactical nature of alliances between<br />

oppressed and oppressor forces, so the alignment of forces<br />

in the settler War of Independence only proved that the national<br />

patriotic struggle of Euro-Amerikans was opposite<br />

to the basic interests and political desires of the oppressed.<br />

Even in the ruins of British defeat, the soundness<br />

of this viewpoint was born out in practice. While the<br />

jubilant Patriots watched the defeated British army<br />

evacuate New York City in 1783, some 4,000 Afrikans<br />

swarmed aboard the departing ships to escape Amerika.<br />

Another 4,000 Afrikans escaped with the British from<br />

Savannah, 6,000 from Charleston, and 5,000 escaped<br />

aboard British ships prior to the surrender. (29) Did these<br />

brothers and sisters "lose" the war-compared to those<br />

still in chains on the plantations?<br />

Others chose neither to leave nor submit. All during<br />

the war Indian and Afrikan guerrillas struck at the settlers.<br />

In one case, three hundred Afrikan ex-slaves fought<br />

an extended guerrilla campaign against the planters in both<br />

Georgia and South Carolina. Originally allied to the<br />

British forces, they continued their independent campaign<br />

long after the British defeat. They were not overcome until<br />

1786, when their secret fort at Bear Creek was discovered<br />

and overwhelmed. This was but one front in the true<br />

democratic struggle against Amerika.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!