28.01.2014 Views

How to Kill a Black Swan Remy Briand and David Owyong ...

How to Kill a Black Swan Remy Briand and David Owyong ...

How to Kill a Black Swan Remy Briand and David Owyong ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2<br />

Offer<br />

NAV Proxy<br />

Bid<br />

Using The Every-15-Second NAV Proxy<br />

To Determine Bids <strong>and</strong> Offers<br />

A B C D E<br />

15sec 15sec 15sec 15sec 15sec<br />

Time<br />

temporaneous with the futures markets. Since the change <strong>to</strong><br />

a formal close at 4:00 p.m., ETF volume between 4:00 p.m.<br />

<strong>and</strong> 4:15 p.m. has not changed materially. On May 15, 2009,<br />

the day before this article was prepared for submission, ETFs<br />

were four of the five most active issues in after-hours trading.<br />

One of that day’s most active after-hours ETFs is based<br />

on an index that does not have an active futures contract.<br />

ETF Intraday Net Asset Value Proxies<br />

When trading began in the first ETF introduced in the<br />

United States (the S&P 500 SPDR launched in 1993), the<br />

Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) required that the<br />

sponsors of the SPDR arrange for dissemination of an intraday<br />

share value proxy for the SPDR at 15-second intervals. These<br />

proxies are usually called indicative optimized portfolio values<br />

(IOPVs). The requirement for publishing these values was<br />

extended <strong>to</strong> every domestic equity ETF launched since 1993<br />

<strong>and</strong>, with modifications, <strong>to</strong> ETFs holding foreign equities,<br />

fixed-income instruments <strong>and</strong> other financial instruments.<br />

In spite of improvements in trading data calculation<br />

technology <strong>and</strong> the introduction of ETF portfolios that hold<br />

infrequently traded securities, calculations of these intraday<br />

value proxies are still based on the most recent trade of each<br />

portfolio component. Matt Hougan discusses the inadequacy<br />

of last-sale value proxies in an article scheduled <strong>to</strong> appear<br />

in the July 2009 issue of ETFR. These intraday value proxy<br />

calculations are made <strong>and</strong>/or disseminated by the National<br />

Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) <strong>and</strong> other service<br />

providers <strong>to</strong> “support” intraday trading of ETFs.<br />

Professional ETF traders <strong>and</strong> market makers do not use<br />

the “official” every-15-second proxy value calculations <strong>to</strong> help<br />

them determine their ETF bids <strong>and</strong> offers. Professionals develop<br />

their own valuations or subscribe <strong>to</strong> real-time ETF value calculations<br />

based on contemporary bids <strong>and</strong> offers rather than<br />

last sales. The fact that they do not use the free IOPV does not<br />

mean that these professionals lack faith in the NSCC’s ability<br />

<strong>to</strong> calculate correct values. The simple facts are that the last<br />

sale is not a reliable indica<strong>to</strong>r of contemporary values in most<br />

Price<br />

market situations, <strong>and</strong> the 15-second interval between valuations<br />

is <strong>to</strong>o long for the values <strong>to</strong> be useful <strong>to</strong> a trader.<br />

Because an ETF is a derivative security, its current value<br />

changes every time the value of any component of the ETF<br />

portfolio changes. The ETF value proxies used by professional<br />

traders are calculated from the midpoint of the bid <strong>and</strong><br />

offer for each position in the ETF portfolio. Sometimes the<br />

value calculations made by <strong>and</strong> for professionals use the size<br />

of bids <strong>and</strong> offers <strong>and</strong> the pattern of “changes” <strong>to</strong> forecast<br />

short-term trends. Figure 2 illustrates how a naive inves<strong>to</strong>r<br />

might attempt <strong>to</strong> use the “free” intraday proxy information<br />

<strong>to</strong> develop a bid or offer for ETF shares.<br />

In Figure 2, the latest IOPV is represented by a dot at<br />

the beginning of each of the five 15-second intervals illustrated.<br />

Inves<strong>to</strong>rs might place limit orders at prices close <strong>to</strong><br />

the most recent per-share value proxy. Columns A through<br />

E illustrate how bids <strong>and</strong> offers entered at equal distances,<br />

respectively, below <strong>and</strong> above a sequence of these every-15-<br />

second net asset value (NAV) proxy calculations might become<br />

transactions—but not always the transaction that the inves<strong>to</strong>r<br />

entering the order hoped <strong>to</strong> achieve. An offer <strong>to</strong> sell the ETF’s<br />

shares slightly above the proxy value posted at the beginning<br />

of time interval A would probably be lifted as the fund portfolio<br />

value rose during intervals A <strong>and</strong> B. That offer was below<br />

the changing per-share proxy value by the time that value was<br />

updated at the beginning of interval C—less than 30 seconds<br />

after the order was entered. The offer was also below the<br />

likely bid in the market at that time. Of course, some of the<br />

last-sale prices used <strong>to</strong> calculate each 15-second proxy might<br />

be more than a few minutes old at the time the calculation<br />

was made. Using the free 15-second values can be costly, but<br />

even if inves<strong>to</strong>rs had access <strong>to</strong> proxy values based on every-<br />

15-second midpoints of bids <strong>and</strong> offers <strong>and</strong> could enter orders<br />

as soon as the value was published, a lot can change before or<br />

shortly after the next proxy value is published.<br />

In my experience, many inves<strong>to</strong>rs are aware of the existence<br />

of the every-15-second last-sale NAV proxy value, but<br />

few know how <strong>to</strong> find it for a particular ETF <strong>and</strong> even fewer<br />

think about how, if at all, <strong>to</strong> use it. It is probably a good thing<br />

that these proxies are not widely used. Any attempt <strong>to</strong> use<br />

them <strong>to</strong> manage an order is more likely <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>to</strong> disappointment<br />

than <strong>to</strong> a good execution. The information on share values,<br />

transaction prices, bids <strong>and</strong> offers summarized in Figure<br />

1 indicates that ETF bid <strong>and</strong> offer updates are published<br />

more frequently than every 15 seconds (every time portfolio<br />

component bids or offers change materially), making the ETF<br />

share bids <strong>and</strong> offers a much better indication of the current<br />

market for an actively traded ETF than the every-15-second<br />

last-sale proxy calculation could possibly be.<br />

The posted ETF bids <strong>and</strong> offers also have the advantage of<br />

being something you can trade with. You cannot trade with<br />

the every-15-second NAV proxy because it does not represent<br />

a bid or offer for the ETF shares. An inves<strong>to</strong>r can be confident<br />

that, even if his market data vendor is a bit slower <strong>and</strong> updates<br />

quotes less promptly than the best data vendors, he will not<br />

be seriously disadvantaged relative <strong>to</strong> other retail market participants.<br />

Bids <strong>and</strong> offers for the most actively traded ETFs tend<br />

both <strong>to</strong> be tighter <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> change more frequently than s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

26<br />

July/August 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!