the effect of hydric stress on some characteristics of sunflower plants
the effect of hydric stress on some characteristics of sunflower plants the effect of hydric stress on some characteristics of sunflower plants
16 ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Number 16 / 2001 For peroxidase determination
ELENA PETCU ET AL.: THE EFFECT OF HYDRIC STRESS ON SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF SUNFLOWER PLANTS 17 During
- Page 1: THE EFFECT OF HYDRIC STRESS ON SOME
- Page 5 and 6: ELENA PETCU ET AL.: THE EFFECT OF H
- Page 7 and 8: ELENA PETCU ET AL.: THE EFFECT OF H
16<br />
ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH<br />
Number 16 / 2001<br />
For peroxidase determinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vertical<br />
electrophoresis in polyacrilamide native gel was<br />
used.<br />
Experiment 2<br />
Five standard <strong>sunflower</strong> hybrids provided<br />
by Fundulea Research Institute were used in<br />
this experiment: Alex, Favorit, Justin, Romina<br />
and Splendor.<br />
The seeds were sown in pots (27 kg capacity)<br />
in soil: sand (4:1) mixture, in vegetati<strong>on</strong><br />
house.<br />
The experimental variants were:<br />
a) c<strong>on</strong>trol – <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong> <strong>plants</strong> were kept<br />
up to physiological maturity at optimal soil humidity<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, 70% soil water capacity respectively;<br />
b) drought – was induced before flowering<br />
and 12 days after flowering <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong><br />
<strong>plants</strong> were kept at 40% soil water capacity;<br />
The fatty acids were analysed by gas<br />
chromatography (GS) according to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
method: <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transformati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> triglycerides<br />
to fatty acid methyl esters was performed<br />
with trimethylsulf<strong>on</strong>iumhydroxid (TMSH). The<br />
capillary column (BP x 70) by 25 m length <strong>on</strong><br />
a DELSI gas chromatograph with flame i<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong><br />
detector (FID) was used. Injector and detector<br />
temperature were kept at 270 and 280 ° C.<br />
The carrier gas was helium, with a flow rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
20 ml/min. The total area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> peaks and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each fatty acid peak was expressed as a<br />
percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total area.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
As first resp<strong>on</strong>se <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings<br />
grown under <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reducti<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> leaf area and height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>plants</strong> were registered.<br />
Leaf area was insignificantly reduced in<br />
<strong>sunflower</strong> grown <strong>on</strong>e week under drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
(from 0.8% for Favorit up to 15% for<br />
Justin hybrid) and significantly reduced in all<br />
<strong>sunflower</strong> genotypes grown two weeks under<br />
drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (up to 50%) (Table 1).<br />
In all <strong>sunflower</strong> hybrids, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
drought treatment c<strong>on</strong>sisted in a significant decrease<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>plants</strong>, less in hybrid Alex<br />
and more in hybrid Justin (Table 2).<br />
Table 1. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> leaf area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings<br />
Leaf area<br />
Hybrids<br />
(1 week) (2 weeks)<br />
Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Variants<br />
mm 2 % mm 2 %<br />
Alex<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 4.77 100 55.52 100<br />
Drought 4.36 91.5 24.85 44.8<br />
Favorit<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 6.23 100 62.95 100<br />
Drought 6.18 99.2 29.83 47.4<br />
Justin<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 5.23 100 49.42 100<br />
Drought 4.44 85.0 28.46 57.6<br />
Romin C<strong>on</strong>trol 5.55 100 54.92 100<br />
a Drought 5.32 99.6 28.68 52.2<br />
Splendor<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 5.15 100 56.77 100<br />
Drought 4.93 95.7 28.38<br />
50.0<br />
Table 2 . The <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> shoot size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings<br />
Hybrids<br />
Alex<br />
Favorit<br />
Justin<br />
Romina<br />
Splendor<br />
Height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Variants<br />
<strong>plants</strong><br />
mm %<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 621 100<br />
Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 457 73.6<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 641 100<br />
Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 459 71.6<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 600 100<br />
Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 385 64.2<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 659 100<br />
Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 450 68.3<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol 571 100<br />
Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 413 72.3<br />
The significant positive correlati<strong>on</strong> between<br />
leaf area and plant height under <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> is obvious (r = 0.953***, Figure<br />
1).<br />
Figure 1. The correlati<strong>on</strong> between leaf area and height<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings under <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g>