the effect of hydric stress on some characteristics of sunflower plants

the effect of hydric stress on some characteristics of sunflower plants the effect of hydric stress on some characteristics of sunflower plants

incda.fundulea.ro
from incda.fundulea.ro More from this publisher
28.01.2014 Views

16 ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Number 16 / 2001 For peroxidase determination ong>theong> vertical electrophoresis in polyacrilamide native gel was used. Experiment 2 Five standard sunflower hybrids provided by Fundulea Research Institute were used in this experiment: Alex, Favorit, Justin, Romina and Splendor. The seeds were sown in pots (27 kg capacity) in soil: sand (4:1) mixture, in vegetation house. The experimental variants were: a) control – ong>theong> sunflower plants were kept up to physiological maturity at optimal soil humidity conditions, 70% soil water capacity respectively; b) drought – was induced before flowering and 12 days after flowering ong>theong> sunflower plants were kept at 40% soil water capacity; The fatty acids were analysed by gas chromatography (GS) according to ong>theong> conventional method: ong>theong> transformation ong>ofong> triglycerides to fatty acid methyl esters was performed with trimethylsulfoniumhydroxid (TMSH). The capillary column (BP x 70) by 25 m length on a DELSI gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector (FID) was used. Injector and detector temperature were kept at 270 and 280 ° C. The carrier gas was helium, with a flow rate ong>ofong> 20 ml/min. The total area ong>ofong> ong>theong> peaks and ong>theong> area ong>ofong> each fatty acid peak was expressed as a percentage ong>ofong> ong>theong> total area. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION As first response ong>ofong> sunflower seedlings grown under ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> conditions ong>theong> reduction ong>ofong> leaf area and height ong>ofong> plants were registered. Leaf area was insignificantly reduced in sunflower grown one week under drought conditions (from 0.8% for Favorit up to 15% for Justin hybrid) and significantly reduced in all sunflower genotypes grown two weeks under drought conditions (up to 50%) (Table 1). In all sunflower hybrids, ong>theong> ong>effectong> ong>ofong> drought treatment consisted in a significant decrease ong>ofong> height ong>ofong> plants, less in hybrid Alex and more in hybrid Justin (Table 2). Table 1. The ong>effectong> ong>ofong> ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> on leaf area ong>ofong> sunflower seedlings Leaf area Hybrids (1 week) (2 weeks) Hydric ong>stressong> Hydric ong>stressong> Variants mm 2 % mm 2 % Alex Control 4.77 100 55.52 100 Drought 4.36 91.5 24.85 44.8 Favorit Control 6.23 100 62.95 100 Drought 6.18 99.2 29.83 47.4 Justin Control 5.23 100 49.42 100 Drought 4.44 85.0 28.46 57.6 Romin Control 5.55 100 54.92 100 a Drought 5.32 99.6 28.68 52.2 Splendor Control 5.15 100 56.77 100 Drought 4.93 95.7 28.38 50.0 Table 2 . The ong>effectong> ong>ofong> ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> on shoot size ong>ofong> sunflower seedlings Hybrids Alex Favorit Justin Romina Splendor Height ong>ofong> Variants plants mm % Control 621 100 Hydric ong>stressong> (2 weeks) 457 73.6 Control 641 100 Hydric ong>stressong> (2 weeks) 459 71.6 Control 600 100 Hydric ong>stressong> (2 weeks) 385 64.2 Control 659 100 Hydric ong>stressong> (2 weeks) 450 68.3 Control 571 100 Hydric ong>stressong> (2 weeks) 413 72.3 The significant positive correlation between leaf area and plant height under ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> condition is obvious (r = 0.953***, Figure 1). Figure 1. The correlation between leaf area and height ong>ofong> sunflower seedlings under ong>hydricong> ong>stressong>

ELENA PETCU ET AL.: THE EFFECT OF HYDRIC STRESS ON SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF SUNFLOWER PLANTS 17 During ong>theong> different stages ong>ofong> vegetation ong>theong> hybrid Favorit has registered a higher value ong>ofong> leaf area both under control and ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> variants as compared with ong>theong> hybrid Justin (Figure 2). This response could be considered as an usual reaction ong>ofong> sunflower plants in order to reduce water use. Figure 2. The ong>effectong> ong>ofong> ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> on leaf area ong>ofong> sunflower plants at different data ong>ofong> analyses (1 = before flowering; 2 = at 1 week after flowering; 3 = at 2 weeks a fter flowering) The chlorophyll content is one ong>ofong> ong>theong> most important indicators ong>ofong> vegetation stage and its degradation is normally considered a measure ong>ofong> drought resistance (Beard, 1973; Kim et al., 1989). The total chlorophyll content (expressed as SPAD units) was reduced under drought conditions, except for Favorit and Justin which presented after two weeks under ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> conditions an insignificant increase ong>ofong> chlorophyll content as compared with control (Figure 3). Chlorophyll content (SPAD units) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Alex Favorit Justin Romina Control 1 Hydric ong>stressong> 1 Control 2 Hydric ong>stressong> 2 Figure 3. Effect ong>ofong> hydri c ong>stressong> on chlorophyll content in sunflower leaves Dry matter production ong>ofong> shoots, leaves and roots was significantly reduced under ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> conditions for all tested genotypes. Beside ong>theong> genetic variability ong>ofong> tested sunflower hybrids, differences were registered between ong>theong> analysed organs, too. It is obvious that leaves and shoots were more influenced by ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> than roots. Thus, dry matter accumulation in roots ong>ofong> Favorit hybrid under drought is higher than under control. Also, ong>theong> values ong>ofong> ong>theong> rest ong>ofong> ong>theong> tested sunflower hybrids were up to 70%. Under ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> conditions, ong>theong> root/shoot ratio increases. The increase in ong>theong> Favorit hybrid was obvious (72%) and from 23 to 45,8% in Romina and respectively Justin. These results show that ong>theong> total root mass increases with drought ong>stressong> (Table 3). The shoot/root mass ratios consistently decrease under drought ong>stressong>, which is a universal expression ong>ofong> adaptation (Blum, 1988). The increase ong>ofong> root/shoot ratio is mentioned in literature (Sharp and Davies, 1985; Sharp and Boyer, 1986). Previous reports underlined ong>theong> genetic diversity ong>ofong> hybrid sunflower roots and ong>theong> influence ong>ofong> soil environmental conditions on ong>theong> rooting system (Þerbea et al., 1995; Petcu et al., 1997; Aguera et al., 1997). Our results show that during ong>theong> first days ong>ofong> ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> ong>theong> nutritive reserves ong>ofong> sunflower seedlings were conducted to develop ong>theong> roots, in order to facilitate deep soil moisture extraction. This happens in detriment ong>ofong> shoot development and in this case a drift is occurring in ong>theong> main sink for surviving. Concerning ong>theong> root/shoot ratio, ong>theong> response ong>ofong> mature plants to ong>hydricong> ong>stressong> is different than seedling response as ong>theong> sink is different. The root/shoot ratio ong>ofong> mature plants decreases under drought ong>stressong> in Favorit and Splendor but increases in Alex, Justin and Romina hybrid. So, some differences between ong>theong> tested genotypes in response ong>ofong> drought were noticed (Table 4). The head/shoot ratio increased under drought in all genotypes, this proving ong>theong> different sinks at mature plants (Figure 4). It is well known that water ong>stressong> has a prong>ofong>ound ong>effectong> on sunflower yield (Murriel and

16<br />

ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH<br />

Number 16 / 2001<br />

For peroxidase determinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vertical<br />

electrophoresis in polyacrilamide native gel was<br />

used.<br />

Experiment 2<br />

Five standard <strong>sunflower</strong> hybrids provided<br />

by Fundulea Research Institute were used in<br />

this experiment: Alex, Favorit, Justin, Romina<br />

and Splendor.<br />

The seeds were sown in pots (27 kg capacity)<br />

in soil: sand (4:1) mixture, in vegetati<strong>on</strong><br />

house.<br />

The experimental variants were:<br />

a) c<strong>on</strong>trol – <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong> <strong>plants</strong> were kept<br />

up to physiological maturity at optimal soil humidity<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, 70% soil water capacity respectively;<br />

b) drought – was induced before flowering<br />

and 12 days after flowering <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong><br />

<strong>plants</strong> were kept at 40% soil water capacity;<br />

The fatty acids were analysed by gas<br />

chromatography (GS) according to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

method: <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transformati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> triglycerides<br />

to fatty acid methyl esters was performed<br />

with trimethylsulf<strong>on</strong>iumhydroxid (TMSH). The<br />

capillary column (BP x 70) by 25 m length <strong>on</strong><br />

a DELSI gas chromatograph with flame i<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong><br />

detector (FID) was used. Injector and detector<br />

temperature were kept at 270 and 280 ° C.<br />

The carrier gas was helium, with a flow rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

20 ml/min. The total area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> peaks and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each fatty acid peak was expressed as a<br />

percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total area.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

As first resp<strong>on</strong>se <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings<br />

grown under <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reducti<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> leaf area and height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>plants</strong> were registered.<br />

Leaf area was insignificantly reduced in<br />

<strong>sunflower</strong> grown <strong>on</strong>e week under drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(from 0.8% for Favorit up to 15% for<br />

Justin hybrid) and significantly reduced in all<br />

<strong>sunflower</strong> genotypes grown two weeks under<br />

drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (up to 50%) (Table 1).<br />

In all <strong>sunflower</strong> hybrids, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

drought treatment c<strong>on</strong>sisted in a significant decrease<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>plants</strong>, less in hybrid Alex<br />

and more in hybrid Justin (Table 2).<br />

Table 1. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> leaf area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings<br />

Leaf area<br />

Hybrids<br />

(1 week) (2 weeks)<br />

Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Variants<br />

mm 2 % mm 2 %<br />

Alex<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 4.77 100 55.52 100<br />

Drought 4.36 91.5 24.85 44.8<br />

Favorit<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 6.23 100 62.95 100<br />

Drought 6.18 99.2 29.83 47.4<br />

Justin<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 5.23 100 49.42 100<br />

Drought 4.44 85.0 28.46 57.6<br />

Romin C<strong>on</strong>trol 5.55 100 54.92 100<br />

a Drought 5.32 99.6 28.68 52.2<br />

Splendor<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 5.15 100 56.77 100<br />

Drought 4.93 95.7 28.38<br />

50.0<br />

Table 2 . The <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> shoot size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings<br />

Hybrids<br />

Alex<br />

Favorit<br />

Justin<br />

Romina<br />

Splendor<br />

Height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Variants<br />

<strong>plants</strong><br />

mm %<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 621 100<br />

Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 457 73.6<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 641 100<br />

Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 459 71.6<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 600 100<br />

Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 385 64.2<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 659 100<br />

Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 450 68.3<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol 571 100<br />

Hydric <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2 weeks) 413 72.3<br />

The significant positive correlati<strong>on</strong> between<br />

leaf area and plant height under <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> is obvious (r = 0.953***, Figure<br />

1).<br />

Figure 1. The correlati<strong>on</strong> between leaf area and height<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sunflower</strong> seedlings under <str<strong>on</strong>g>hydric</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stress</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!