Telescope Optical Design - inaoe
Telescope Optical Design - inaoe Telescope Optical Design - inaoe
Infrared emission Effective Y, J, K, Hs SASIR throughput Mauna Kea atmospheric transmission compared to the emissivity of a 2% emissive telescope for 2- mm of water vapour. Note how a mid-IR instrument is limited by the telescope emisivity over a significant part of the 10 micron window. Image: University of Florida Astronomy Group. Diciembre 27, 2007 Astronomía Observacional IA-UNAM
SASIR pre-conceptual design Tels explored: f/3.0 – f/9.0 D2: 2.6 – 1.15 m Rc2: 10.1 - 2.8 m C2: -8.7 to -1.82 C1: -1.2 to -1.01 WFC: D1: 850 – 917mm R1: 1.67 – 1.18 m Collimator: D = 515 – 1148 mm F = 600 – 1800 mm Camera (F=500 mm) D = 457 – 426 mm
- Page 1 and 2: Synoptic All-Sky Infrared Survey Te
- Page 3 and 4: SASIR dedicated telescope A new lar
- Page 5 and 6: SPM-Twin: Competitiveness based on
- Page 7 and 8: FWHM ["] FWHM ["] SPM-Twin: 1.5°-2
- Page 9 and 10: Diameter [mm] SPM-Twin: WF Telescop
- Page 11 and 12: SPM-Twin: WFT Atmospheric Dispersio
- Page 13 and 14: 100 cm S P M 6.5m f/4.5 WFT Effecti
- Page 15: Infrared emission Mauna Kea atmosph
- Page 23 and 24: Normal Field 9’ FoV (0.075)
- Page 25 and 26: WFCAM (UKIDSS) ‣ 3.8 m UK InfraRe
- Page 27: f/2.5
- Page 32 and 33: Relevant issues to cover by the opt
- Page 34 and 35: Thanks!
- Page 36 and 37: ‣ Input from the community (diver
- Page 38 and 39: Resolving power SPM-Twin: Wide-Fiel
- Page 40 and 41: Sitios privilegiados para el visibl
- Page 42 and 43: Algunos de los primarios de hoy 67t
- Page 44 and 45: Basic Survey ‣ ~ 20 sec dithered
- Page 46: Technical Concept (Detectors)
- Page 49 and 50: M US$ 1 st order estimate Need IR-C
- Page 51 and 52: Detectors ‣ The cost of large for
- Page 53 and 54: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Telescopios
- Page 55 and 56: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Telescopios
- Page 57 and 58: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Very LargeTe
- Page 59 and 60: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Telescopios
- Page 61 and 62: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Cost-Apertur
- Page 63 and 64: Previous work $ ~ D 2.6 (Smith-Kale
- Page 65 and 66: Cost [FY2008 $Million] 1000.0 100.0
Infrared emission<br />
Effective Y, J, K, Hs SASIR throughput<br />
Mauna Kea atmospheric transmission compared to the emissivity of a 2% emissive telescope for 2-<br />
mm of water vapour. Note how a mid-IR instrument is limited by the telescope emisivity over a<br />
significant part of the 10 micron window. Image: University of Florida Astronomy Group.<br />
Diciembre 27, 2007<br />
Astronomía Observacional IA-UNAM
Change language