Telescope Optical Design - inaoe
Telescope Optical Design - inaoe Telescope Optical Design - inaoe
SPM-Twin: WF Telescope focal ratios (III) 90% PSF ["] FWHM ["] 0.5 WFT Image Quality (Telescope PSF) 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.5° Field 1.0° Field 0.5° Field 0.1 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Telescope f/# 1.0 WFT Image Diameters (Sky sampling) IF Spectroscopy: PSF extent is relevant (not just FWHM) 0.8 0.6 0.4 2.0° Field 1.5° Field 1.0° Field 0.5° Field 0.2 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Telescope f/#
SPM-Twin: WFT Atmospheric Dispersion Correction Performance (Z=60° over 1.5° field of view) Circles: 2” aperture (Spaxel)
- Page 1 and 2: Synoptic All-Sky Infrared Survey Te
- Page 3 and 4: SASIR dedicated telescope A new lar
- Page 5 and 6: SPM-Twin: Competitiveness based on
- Page 7 and 8: FWHM ["] FWHM ["] SPM-Twin: 1.5°-2
- Page 9: Diameter [mm] SPM-Twin: WF Telescop
- Page 13 and 14: 100 cm S P M 6.5m f/4.5 WFT Effecti
- Page 15 and 16: Infrared emission Mauna Kea atmosph
- Page 17: SASIR pre-conceptual design Tels ex
- Page 23 and 24: Normal Field 9’ FoV (0.075)
- Page 25 and 26: WFCAM (UKIDSS) ‣ 3.8 m UK InfraRe
- Page 27: f/2.5
- Page 32 and 33: Relevant issues to cover by the opt
- Page 34 and 35: Thanks!
- Page 36 and 37: ‣ Input from the community (diver
- Page 38 and 39: Resolving power SPM-Twin: Wide-Fiel
- Page 40 and 41: Sitios privilegiados para el visibl
- Page 42 and 43: Algunos de los primarios de hoy 67t
- Page 44 and 45: Basic Survey ‣ ~ 20 sec dithered
- Page 46: Technical Concept (Detectors)
- Page 49 and 50: M US$ 1 st order estimate Need IR-C
- Page 51 and 52: Detectors ‣ The cost of large for
- Page 53 and 54: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Telescopios
- Page 55 and 56: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Telescopios
- Page 57 and 58: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Very LargeTe
- Page 59 and 60: Cost [FY2008 $Million] Telescopios
SPM-Twin: WFT Atmospheric Dispersion Correction<br />
Performance (Z=60° over 1.5° field of view)<br />
Circles:<br />
2” aperture<br />
(Spaxel)
Change language