26.01.2014 Views

INDIAN SCIENCE CONGRESS - India Environment Portal

INDIAN SCIENCE CONGRESS - India Environment Portal

INDIAN SCIENCE CONGRESS - India Environment Portal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section XIV : Plant Sciences 7<br />

of mushrooms specially Boletes. Prior to Dr. Roy Watling’s visit one of his students<br />

Dr. Alexander, who worked on the mycorrhiza, visited Shimla as a guest of the<br />

Conifer Research Centre, now Himalayan Forest Research Institute. It was he who<br />

for the first time introduced me to mycorrhiza; these visits led to my ‘symbiotic<br />

association and journey with mushrooms and mycorrhiza’.<br />

Since Agaricales is a large assemblage of mushrooms and toadstools, comprising<br />

more than 20 families (Singer, 1986), instead of initiating work on all families,<br />

I decided to begin family wise survey, starting with the family Boletaceae (Sharma<br />

and Lakhanpal, 1981; Sharma, 1980, Sharma, 1986; Sagar 1988; Lakhanpal, 1996).<br />

In the family Boletaceae 7 genera and 57 species were recorded. The seven<br />

genera recorded are Austroboletus (1) Boletus (37), Gyproporus (2), Leccinum<br />

(6), Strobilomyces (3), Suillus (5) and Tylopilus (3). This work included 5 new<br />

species and an equal number of new varieties. The work on Boletaceae was<br />

compiled into a monograph : Mushrooms of <strong>India</strong>-Boletaceae (Lakhanpal, 1996)<br />

The systematics was accompanied by supplementary data on edible species and 22<br />

species in Boletaceae were found to be edible. Among these Boletus edulis was<br />

the species of choice. Besides a new species B. hoarkii sp. nov. was also<br />

identified. About 22 species of boletes were identified to be mycorrhizal with<br />

different predominant tree species.<br />

In 1981, the mushroom exploration was extended to the families Amanitaceae,<br />

Russulaceae and Cantharellaaceae. The collections were primarily made from<br />

Shimla and adjoining areas. In these collections the genus Amanita in Amanitaceae<br />

was represented by 12 species; genus Lactarius and Russula in Russulaceae by<br />

14 and 22 species, respectively and genus Cantharellus and Craterellus by 5 and<br />

2 species respectively (Bhatt, 1986; Bhatt and Lakhanpal, 1988a, b,c). With the<br />

sanctioning of a project on mushrooms by the Department of Science and<br />

Technology (GOI) in 1983, work was extended to different parts of Himachal<br />

Pradesh and 6 more species in Amanitaceae were collected bringing the total<br />

number to 18 in the N. W. Himalayas and 25 in <strong>India</strong> (Kumar, 1987). This resulted<br />

in the publication of “Amanitaceae of <strong>India</strong>” (Kumar et al. , 1990). This work<br />

included 4 taxa new to science, 13 species were observed to be mycorrhizal with<br />

different trees species. Out of these only Amanita caesaria and A. vaginata were<br />

found to be edible and consumed locally by the people. Typical A. muscaria was<br />

not recorded however; only A. muscaria var. flavivolvata was recorded. Similarly<br />

the exploration was also intensified on Russulaceae and Cantharellaceae (Bhatt,<br />

1986).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!