25.01.2014 Views

Japanese Prints

Japanese Prints

Japanese Prints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68<br />

294<br />

294. [SINO-JAPANESE WAR, 1894 5.] A <strong>Japanese</strong> Meiji<br />

print of the Sino-<strong>Japanese</strong> War, 1894-5. Tokyo, 1895. £250<br />

Oban triptych coloured woodblock print (730 x 380 mm), sometime<br />

joined together, brown discolouration visible along vertical joins<br />

where glue applied, else in very good condition.<br />

A print depicting the aftermath of a land battle on the Liaodong<br />

peninsula. The victorious <strong>Japanese</strong> stand on a defensive wall,<br />

<strong>Japanese</strong> flag flying as their trumpeters herald success. It is called<br />

picture of the Second Army occupying Jinzhou castle and was<br />

issued in January Meiji year 28 (A.d. 1895) by the publishers<br />

Kichijiro Inoue who had it engraved by Watanake Yatarou, also<br />

known as Horiyata, an eminent engraver of the Meiji period. The<br />

Liaodong peninsula on which Jinzhou is located was a major battle<br />

site during the conflict. Its capture by the <strong>Japanese</strong> crippled the<br />

chinese, who after the war were forced to cede it to Japan in the<br />

Treaty of Shimonoseki (17 April 1895).<br />

“By 1894 Japan was ready to prove to the world that her recent<br />

efforts at modernization were more than skin-deep. Ironically, the<br />

best demonstration that she was a fully civilized country was to<br />

wage war. Although brief in duration, lasting less than a year from<br />

August 1894 until May 1895, the Sino-<strong>Japanese</strong> War galvanized the<br />

entire nation with patriotic fervor and a thirst for territorial<br />

expansion. It also gained her the measure of respect she sought<br />

from Western nations . “The war naturally stimulated documentary<br />

photography and gave rise to a steady stream of illustrated<br />

newspaper articles, but the woodcuts, which for the most part had<br />

only a tenuous basis in fact, provided large-scale, colourful images<br />

that must have satisfied a deep-seated aesthetic impulse at the same<br />

time that they pandered to national pride”<br />

(Meech-pekarik, World of the Meiji print p. 200, 201).<br />

295. STANTON, F.M. Album of watercolour botanical<br />

drawings. [No place, probably england] [ca. 1818-28]. £16,000<br />

folio-sized album, 439 x 355 mm, retrospective half green calf gilt<br />

and contemporary red paper boards, contemporary green calf<br />

lettering piece gilt on front cover, titled “Specimens of Oriental<br />

Tinting,” preserved in modern green cloth folding box; 20 fine<br />

paintings of flowers (ca. 380-395 x 297-315 mm), in watercolour<br />

and bodycolour, all but one with captions in gold ink, 12 signed<br />

“Tinted by f. M. Stanton” and 4 initialed “f.M.S.” Manuscript list<br />

of contents (Latin plant names) on a quarto leaf tipped in at front,<br />

listing 24 plants; the 20 present in the album checked off in later<br />

pencil; fine.<br />

A lovely nineteenth-century album of brilliant watercolour flower<br />

paintings. The flowers include roses, dahlias, peonies and above<br />

all American and other exotic species, including passion flowers,<br />

the Aztec lily (amaryllis formosissima), persian pearl tulip (“Tulipa<br />

Oculis Solis”), camellia Japonica, magnolias, dahlias, Jalap<br />

bindweed (convolvulus Jalapa), and a purple poppy.<br />

Vividly coloured, the original watercolours, presumably produced<br />

by the same artist, are applied on thick wove paper and positively<br />

glow. The stencil technique of “oriental tinting” used to produce<br />

these paintings involved transferring a drawing using tracing or<br />

“oriental” paper to surfaces such as wood, velvet, silk, marble or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!