Performance Evaluation of AODV and ADV Protocols in VANET ...

Kusum Dalal et al,Int.J.Comp.Tech.Appl,Vol 3 (1), 50-55
ISSN:2229-6093
Figure 9: Throughput performance in Highway
Scenario with 36 m/s speed and 8 nodes.
From above graphs it can be seen that in highway
scenarios throughput with ADV protocol is much better
than with AODV with throughput peak reaching upto
338 kB/s. Also, as speed is increased the ADV
performance slightly degrades while AODV
performance remains comparatively same.
Figure 12: Throughput performance in City Scenario
with 8 m/s speed and 50 nodes.
Figure 13: Throughput performance in City Scenario
with 18 m/s speed and 20 nodes.
Figure 10: Packet Drop performance in Highway
Scenario with 20 m/s speed and 16 nodes.
In city scenarios also, the throughput performance
of ADV protocol is better than AODV. As the speed is
increased throughput with ADV protocol deteriorates
and for some part even reaches comparative to AODV
performance. AODV performance remains almost
unaffected by increased speed.
Figure 11: Packet Drop performance in Highway
Scenario with 36 m/s speed and 8 nodes.
The packet drop performance of ADV protocol is
much better than AODV in highway scenarios as is
seen from above graphs. As the speed is increased from
20 to 36 m/s the packet drop rate for AODV protocol
increases upto 440 drop packets while ADV packet
drop performance remains comparatively same.
Figure 14: Packet Drop performance in City Scenario
with 8 m/s speed and 50 nodes.
IJCTA | JAN-FEB 2012
Available online@www.ijcta.com
54