Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont
Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont
Protections for respondents • Notice of allegations • Access to evidence; opportunity to respond • Review and comment on inquiry and investigation reports • Confidentiality • Fair, objective process with appropriate expertise ORI 4/05 34
Obligations of respondent • Provide data and other evidence to institution • Cooperate with inquiry or investigation • Avoid retaliation • Protect confidentiality of whistleblower • Understand the process and protect yourself ORI 4/05 35
- Page 1 and 2: Major misconduct case: Eric Poehlma
- Page 3 and 4: Initial allegations (cont) • The
- Page 5 and 6: Correct TEE values Dr. Poehlman’s
- Page 7 and 8: Additional Issues • Dr. Poehlman
- Page 9 and 10: Additional Issues (cont) • The UV
- Page 11 and 12: Obstruction (cont) • During the i
- Page 13 and 14: Why did it take so long to discover
- Page 15 and 16: Summary • The misconduct affected
- Page 17 and 18: Publications Identified for Retract
- Page 19 and 20: Assurance • Assurance on applicat
- Page 21 and 22: What is the involvement of the Verm
- Page 23 and 24: Dr. Poehlman’s Misconduct • Wha
- Page 25 and 26: Responding to Allegations of Miscon
- Page 27 and 28: Success (cont) • Understand the B
- Page 29 and 30: Whistleblower role as complainant
- Page 31 and 32: Protection from retaliation • PHS
- Page 33: ORI Whistleblower Guidelines Offers
- Page 37: Restore reputation • Send letters
Protections for respondents<br />
• Notice <strong>of</strong> allegations<br />
• Access to evidence; opportunity to<br />
respond<br />
• Review and comment on inquiry and<br />
investigation reports<br />
• Confidentiality<br />
• Fair, objective process with appropriate<br />
expertise<br />
ORI 4/05 34
Change language