Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Whistleblower role as witness • Provide evidence • Cooperate with institution • Understand need for objectivity • Accept the outcome ORI 4/05 30
Protection from retaliation • PHS regulation states that institutions will undertake “diligent efforts to protect the positions and reputations of those persons who, in good faith, make allegations” of research misconduct. 42 CFR 50.103(d)(13) • Allegations which are made falsely or in reckless disregard for the truth are not in good faith ORI 4/05 31
Page 1 and 2: Major misconduct case: Eric Poehlma
Page 3 and 4: Initial allegations (cont) • The
Page 5 and 6: Correct TEE values Dr. Poehlman’s
Page 7 and 8: Additional Issues • Dr. Poehlman
Page 9 and 10: Additional Issues (cont) • The UV
Page 11 and 12: Obstruction (cont) • During the i
Page 13 and 14: Why did it take so long to discover
Page 15 and 16: Summary • The misconduct affected
Page 17 and 18: Publications Identified for Retract
Page 19 and 20: Assurance • Assurance on applicat
Page 21 and 22: What is the involvement of the Verm
Page 23 and 24: Dr. Poehlman’s Misconduct • Wha
Page 25 and 26: Responding to Allegations of Miscon
Page 27 and 28: Success (cont) • Understand the B
Page 29: Whistleblower role as complainant
Page 33 and 34: ORI Whistleblower Guidelines Offers
Page 35 and 36: Obligations of respondent • Provi
Page 37: Restore reputation • Send letters

Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?