Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont
Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont
Rights and Obligations of Whistleblowers and Respondents Chris B. Pascal, J.D. Director, Office of Research Integrity ORI 4/05 28
Whistleblower role as complainant • Know your facts • Know the definition of research misconduct • Identify PHS jurisdiction over the allegation • Disclose to responsible officials • Maintain confidentiality • Protect yourself ORI 4/05 29
- Page 1 and 2: Major misconduct case: Eric Poehlma
- Page 3 and 4: Initial allegations (cont) • The
- Page 5 and 6: Correct TEE values Dr. Poehlman’s
- Page 7 and 8: Additional Issues • Dr. Poehlman
- Page 9 and 10: Additional Issues (cont) • The UV
- Page 11 and 12: Obstruction (cont) • During the i
- Page 13 and 14: Why did it take so long to discover
- Page 15 and 16: Summary • The misconduct affected
- Page 17 and 18: Publications Identified for Retract
- Page 19 and 20: Assurance • Assurance on applicat
- Page 21 and 22: What is the involvement of the Verm
- Page 23 and 24: Dr. Poehlman’s Misconduct • Wha
- Page 25 and 26: Responding to Allegations of Miscon
- Page 27: Success (cont) • Understand the B
- Page 31 and 32: Protection from retaliation • PHS
- Page 33 and 34: ORI Whistleblower Guidelines Offers
- Page 35 and 36: Obligations of respondent • Provi
- Page 37: Restore reputation • Send letters
Whistleblower role as<br />
complainant<br />
• Know your facts<br />
• Know the definition <strong>of</strong> research<br />
<strong>misconduct</strong><br />
• Identify PHS jurisdiction over the<br />
allegation<br />
• Disclose to responsible <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
• Maintain confidentiality<br />
• Protect yourself<br />
ORI 4/05 29
Change language