Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ORI actions and the Whistleblower’s s role • ORI/ASH actions against Dr. Poehlman include lifetime debarment from Federal research funding and retraction/correction of ten published papers • The whistleblower in this case later filed a qui tam suit under Federal fraud laws and received a relator’s share of 12% ($22,000) of the Federal recovery of $180,000 ORI 4/05 22
Dr. Poehlman’s Misconduct • What is the impact on the scientific community? • What is the impact on the public? • What are some lessons learned? • What can your institution do to prevent or reduce research misconduct? ORI 4/05 23
Page 1 and 2: Major misconduct case: Eric Poehlma
Page 3 and 4: Initial allegations (cont) • The
Page 5 and 6: Correct TEE values Dr. Poehlman’s
Page 7 and 8: Additional Issues • Dr. Poehlman
Page 9 and 10: Additional Issues (cont) • The UV
Page 11 and 12: Obstruction (cont) • During the i
Page 13 and 14: Why did it take so long to discover
Page 15 and 16: Summary • The misconduct affected
Page 17 and 18: Publications Identified for Retract
Page 19 and 20: Assurance • Assurance on applicat
Page 21: What is the involvement of the Verm
Page 25 and 26: Responding to Allegations of Miscon
Page 27 and 28: Success (cont) • Understand the B
Page 29 and 30: Whistleblower role as complainant
Page 31 and 32: Protection from retaliation • PHS
Page 33 and 34: ORI Whistleblower Guidelines Offers
Page 35 and 36: Obligations of respondent • Provi
Page 37: Restore reputation • Send letters

Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?