Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Summary • Dr. Poehlman falsified and fabricated data in NIH grant applications and in published articles over a 10 year period with NIH funding of almost $3 million • Counting two USDA applications, he provided falsified and fabricated preliminary data to government agencies in 17 different competitive and non- competitive applications. ORI 4/05 14
Summary • The misconduct affected studies related to disease prevention, including research on the health of older men and women, the effect of diet, exercise, menopause status, hormone replacement, and disease status ORI 4/05 15
Page 1 and 2: Major misconduct case: Eric Poehlma
Page 3 and 4: Initial allegations (cont) • The
Page 5 and 6: Correct TEE values Dr. Poehlman’s
Page 7 and 8: Additional Issues • Dr. Poehlman
Page 9 and 10: Additional Issues (cont) • The UV
Page 11 and 12: Obstruction (cont) • During the i
Page 13: Why did it take so long to discover
Page 17 and 18: Publications Identified for Retract
Page 19 and 20: Assurance • Assurance on applicat
Page 21 and 22: What is the involvement of the Verm
Page 23 and 24: Dr. Poehlman’s Misconduct • Wha
Page 25 and 26: Responding to Allegations of Miscon
Page 27 and 28: Success (cont) • Understand the B
Page 29 and 30: Whistleblower role as complainant
Page 31 and 32: Protection from retaliation • PHS
Page 33 and 34: ORI Whistleblower Guidelines Offers
Page 35 and 36: Obligations of respondent • Provi
Page 37: Restore reputation • Send letters

Major misconduct case: Dr. Eric Poehlman, University of Vermont

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?