24.01.2014 Views

International Law and Justice Working Papers - IILJ

International Law and Justice Working Papers - IILJ

International Law and Justice Working Papers - IILJ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This is a thoroughly erudite study but also a highly interesting work from the methodological<br />

point of view. At the outset, Bulmerincq gives an explanation about why he turns to the history:<br />

it must be found out whether according to international law, States can offer asylum to citizens<br />

of other States. “Recently, extradition treaties have been concluded between States but they are<br />

not sufficient since constrained with time <strong>and</strong> not binding to non-members. The general norm<br />

has yet to be established. (…) To observe this development <strong>and</strong> to tie to it a future development is<br />

a purpose of this work that should prove the unconditional obligation of all States to extradite<br />

fugitive criminals. But how can one best accomplish this task? The historical development has to<br />

be taken as the basis of observation.” 56<br />

It is astonishing that Bulmerincq already explains<br />

beforeh<strong>and</strong> what the ultimate outcome of his turn to the history would be, what the history<br />

should demonstrate. He does not leave it open whether there exists such an unconditional<br />

obligation to extradite or not. Here, history serves a classical teleological purpose: to prove a<br />

particular claim or thesis. Bulmerincq’s approach to the history of international law was<br />

generally teleological: the historical foundation of international law was supposed to raise the<br />

potential of <strong>and</strong> respect for the discipline. 57 Already in his “Systematic de Völkerrechts” (1858)<br />

Bulmerincq insisted that “In the current problems of international law, the deniers of this law<br />

may not even present the biggest problem: the main guilt has the scholarship because it has not<br />

done what it had to do: to demonstrate positive international law historically <strong>and</strong> through that as<br />

non-attackable. 58<br />

56 P. 9.<br />

57 See e.g. Bulmerincq, Brief an die Dorpater Juristen-Facultät anlässlich der Glückwünsche zum Doktorjubiläum,<br />

Wiesbaden, 14. Mai 1881: „Überhaupt aber war der Unterzeichnete bemüht die Bedeutung der publizistischen<br />

Fächer zu heben, indem er einerseits sie zu systematisieren und <strong>and</strong>ererseits auf historischer Basis aufzurichten<br />

trachtete.“ Tartu University Archive.<br />

58 Bulmerincq, Die Systematik des Völkerrechts, I Teil, Dorpat: Karow, 1858, p. 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!